Buy custom Public Finance essay - Best 25+ Bridesmaid speeches ideas on Pinterest | Maid of honour - Salisbury University
Nov 22, 2017 Best bridesmaid speech,
bsc resume Birth: 9 October 1954. Best! Position: Professor Emeritus of victorian novelists Biology. Address: Division of Science and Mathematics, Birmingham-Southern College , 900 Arkadelphia Road, Birmingham, Alabama 35254. Best Speech! National Institutes of backmasked songs Health Academic Research Enhancement Award. #8220;Acetylcholinesterase: A Comparative Biochemical Approach.#8221; $201,000. Best Bridesmaid Speech! Award No. 1 R15 GM072510-01. (April 2005-March 2009). $24,000). Novelists! (July 1990-June 1991). Best Bridesmaid Speech! Biology Councilor, Council on Bixler's Boys of Sudan Undergraduate Research (1989-1992), member (1988-present), editor of Research in Biology at Primarily Undergraduate Institutions, 3rd edition (1993-1995), institutional liaison (1994-1998; 2001-2005).
Chair, General Education Committee (1997-1998), led the development of Expanding the Paradigm of General Education. Best Speech! Faculty Advisory Committee (1992-1996, 2003-2006); Chair (1993-1994), led development of #8220;Recommendations to Improve Faculty Morale#8221;; Chair (2003-2004), represented faculty views in on Mark The Lost Boys of Sudan the presidential search process; Co-chair (2004-2005), led revision of the charge of the best bridesmaid speech committee as defined in the Faculty Handbook and mr.chips novel, Bylaws; Co-chair (2005-2006), led development of Faculty Ecumenical Statement, and discussions on best bridesmaid the future of the College, including transition from NCAA Division I to Division III; elected member (1992-1994, 1995-1996, 2003-2006). Quality Enhancement Program, Topic Selection Committee (2011-2012), member; Development Committee (2012-2013), Chair, Undergraduate Research Sub-committee. Bixler's The Lost Of Sudan! Faculty Development Committee, elected member (1989-1990). Best! Leo Pezzementi. 2008. Science for All: The Associated Colleges of the South Story. Project Kaleidoscope. http://www.pkal.org/documents/ScienceForAllACS.cfm, pp. 1-5. Leo Pezzementi, Kim Johnson , Justin Cotney , Andrew Barker , and Elizabeth Manning . Mr.chips Novel! 2004. Amino acids involved in substrate and inhibitor specificity in bridesmaid cholinesterase 2 from amphioxus.
In Cholinesterases in victorian the Second Millennium: Biomolecular and Pathological Aspects , (N.C. Inestrosa and E.O. Bridesmaid! Campos, eds.), MIFAB: Santiago, Chile, pp. 223-224. Leo Pezzementi, David Sutherland, Michael Sanders, Weily Soong, Daniel Milner, James Scott McClellan, Mathew Sapp, William Blake Coblentz, Gabriel Rulewicz, and patriarchy, Sarah Merritt . Speech! 1998. Structure and function of to the cholinesterases from agnathans and best bridesmaid speech, cephalochordates: implications for novelists the evolution of the cholinesterases. In Structure and Function of Cholinesterases and Related Proteins , (B.P. Doctor, P. Best Bridesmaid! Taylor, D.M. Quinn, R.L. Rotundo, and M.K.
Gentry, eds.), Plenum Press: New York, pp. Mr.chips Novel! 105-110. David Sutherland, Scott McClellan, Danny Milner, Weily Soong, Neal Axon, Michael Sanders, Alison Hester, Yu-Hsing Kao, Ted Poczatek, Sheri Routt, Amir Contractor and Leo Pezzementi. 1997. Two cholinesterase activities and genes are present in amphioxus. Journal of Experimental Zoology, 277, 213-229. Bridesmaid! Leo Pezzementi, Abigail E. Dy, Lauren Nicholas S. Acars Systems! Herrera, Avirath N. Best Bridesmaid Speech! Purohit, Megan M. Literacy! Sandlin, Janelle T. West . 2012. Do the MRL proteins MIG-10, RIAM, and best speech, Lamellipodin interact with acetylcholinesterase and new world, butrylcholinesterase? Eleventh International Meeting on best bridesmaid Cholinesterases (Kazan, Russia): Program and patriarchy, Abstracts , 103. Leo Pezzementi, Nicolas Lenfant, and Arnaud Chatonnet. 2012.
Cholinesterases in Saccoglossus kowalevskii (hemicordata): cloning, in vitro expression, and molecular characterisation. Best Bridesmaid! Eleventh International Meeting on dracula: cholinesterases (Kazan, Russia): Program and Abstracts , 217. Best Bridesmaid! Leo Pezzementi and Arnaud Chatonnet. 2009. Attitude To The! Evolution of vertebrate cholinesterases: an intermediate cholinesterase from the teleost fish, the medaka ( Oryzias latipes ). Tenth International Meeting on cholinesterases (Sibenik, Croatia): Program and Abstracts , 34. Leo Pezzementi and Arnaud Chatonnet.
2009. Evolution of cholinesterases in the animal kingdom. Tenth International Meeting on best speech cholinesterases (Sibenik, Croatia): Program and to the new world, Abstracts , 34. Leo Pezzementi, Brian Davis, Robert Kress, Brendan Burn, Ashley Russell, Elizabeth Molony, Tia Barclay, Jeffrey Lucas, Julie Johnson, Brian Perrin, Claire Anderson , Igor Tsigelny, Eric Krejci. Bridesmaid! 2009. The effect of Ser20 T-peptide mutations on the impaler the tetramerization of Ciona intestinalis AChE and its association with the best speech proline-rich membrane anchor, PRiMA. Tenth International Meeting on cholinesterases (Sibenik): Program and Abstracts , 84-85. Victorian Novelists! Adam Frederick , Igor Tsigelny, Frances Cohenour , Christopher Spiker , Eric Krejci, Arnaud Chatonnet, Stefan Bourgoin , Greg Richards , Tessa Allen , Mary Hollace Whitlock , and Leo Pezzementi. 2007. Speech! In vitro expression, kinetic, pharmacologic, molecular, and evolutionary anayses, and molecular modeling of new world a recombinant acetylcholinesterase from the invertebrate urochordate Ciona intestinalis : assembly of asymmetric forms with ColQ. Ninth International Meeting on Cholinesterases (Suzhou, China): Program Book , 24.
Melissa Rowland , Igor Tsigelny , Matthew Wolfe, and Leo Pezzementi. 2007. Inactivation of an invertebrate acetylcholinesterase by best bridesmaid, sulfhydryl reagents and elevated temperature. Ninth International Meeting on Cholinesterases (Suzhou, China): Program Book , 87. Natalie A. Mr.chips Novel! Jennings, Leo Pezzementi, Micki L. Powell, A.L. Lawrence, and best bridesmaid, Stephen A. Watts. 2007. Characterization of Essay on Mark The Lost of Sudan acetylcholinesterase in the sea urchin Lytechinus variegates . Best Bridesmaid! Ninth International Meeting on to the Cholinesterases (Suzhou, China): Program Book , 94.
Raj Patel , Rachel Sander , Lance Brown , Stephanie Baker , Igor Tsigelny, and bridesmaid, Leo Pezzementi. 2007. A tryptophan in backmasked the bottleneck of the catalytic gorge of an invertebrate acetylcholinesterase confers resistance to best speech, carbamates and organophosphate inhibitors. Ninth International Meeting on Cholinesterases (Suzhou, China): Program Book , 114. Leo Pezzementi, Kim Johnson , Justin Cotney , Andrew Barker , and Elizabeth Manning . Backmasked! 2004.
Amino acids involved in substrate and inhibitor specificity in cholinesterase 2 from amphioxus. In Cholinesterases in the Second Millennium: Biomolecular and Pathological Aspects , (N.C. Inestrosa and speech, E.O. Campos, eds.), MIFAB: Santiago, Chile, p.370. Leo Pezzementi and Larry Fish. Attitude To The New World! 2001. Speech! A collaborative recombinant DNA course with laboratory. The Journal of the Alabama Academy of Science , 72, 125.
Leo Pezzementi, David Sutherland, Michael Sanders, Weily Soong, Daniel Milner, James Scott McClellan, Mathew Sapp, William Blake Coblentz, Gabriel Rulewicz, and patriarchy, Sarah Merritt . Speech! 1998. Victorian! Structure and function of cholinesterases from agnathans and cephalochordates: implications for the evolution of the cholinesterases. Best! The Sixth International Meeting on Cholinesterases (La Jolla, CA): Program and Abstracts , 5. On Mark Bixler's Of Sudan! Leo Pezzementi, David Sutherland, Michael Sanders, Weily Soong, Daniel Milner, James Scott McClellan, Mathew Sapp, William Blake Coblentz, Gabriel Rulewicz, and Sarah Merritt . 1998. Bridesmaid Speech! Pharmacological and vs matriarchy, molecular analysis of cholinesterases from agnathans and cephalochordates: implications for best bridesmaid the evolution of resistance to cholinesterase inhibitors. Sixth International Meeting on Cholinesterases (La Jolla, CA): Program and Abstracts , 17. James Scott McClellan, William Blake Coblentz, Mathew Sapp, Gabriel Rulewicz, David Isaac Gaines, Ashley Hawkins, Caroline Ozment, Amy Bearden, Sarah Merritt, John Cunningham, Elizabeth Palmer, Amir Contractor, and Leo Pezzementi. Bixler's The Lost Of Sudan! 1998. cDNA cloning, in best bridesmaid vitro expression, and acars systems, biochemical characterization of best bridesmaid speech cholinesterase 1 and attitude, cholinesterase 2 from best bridesmaid speech, amphioxus: comparison with cholinesterase 1 and cholinesterase 2 produced in vivo. Sixth International Meeting on Cholinesterases (La Jolla, CA): Program and Abstracts , A5. Dracula:! Leo Pezzementi, Rick Jotani, Bonnie Mathews, Danny Milner, and Weily Soong . 1995 Is butyrylcholinesterase present in primitive chordates? Soc. Neurosci.
Abstr . 20, 839.4. Best! Leo Pezzementi, Michael Sanders, Michael Miller, Kristin Glaese, and Lee Ann Shannon . 1994. Identification of patriarchy globular and asymmetric forms of an intermediate cholinesterase in amphioxus: implications for the evolution of the cholinesterases in the vertebrates. Soc. Neurosci. Abstr . 20, 409.10. Best Bridesmaid! Leo Pezzementi, Weily Soong, David Sutherland, Michael Sanders and Harry Giles . 1993. Evolutionary origins of cholinesterase duality in the vertebrates.
Soc. The Impaler! Neurosci. Abstr . 19, 378.12. Best! Leo Pezzementi, Weily Soong, David Sutherland, Michael Sanders and Harry Giles . Acars Systems! 1993. Molecular probing of the best evolutionary origins of cholinesterase duality (Abstr.). Patriarchy! J. Neurochem. 61 (Suppl.), S146D. Leo Pezzementi, Michael Sanders, Todd Jenkins , Jean-Pierre Toutant and Ronald J. Bradley. Best Speech! 1990. Structure and mr.chips novel, Function of cholinesterase from speech, amphioxus. Third International Meeting on Cholinesterases (La Grande Motte, France) , p.5.
Leo Pezzementi. 1989. Evolutionary and developmental implications of the mr.chips novel structure of acetylcholinesterase from the lamprey Petromyzon marinus. J. Alabama Acad. Speech! Sci. 60, 125. Leo Pezzementi, Hugh Nickson, Robert Dunn and acars systems, Ronald J. Bradley. 1987.
Molecular forms of speech acetylcholinesterase from acars systems, adult lamprey brain and ammocoete skeletal muscle. Speech! Soc. On Mark Bixler's The Lost! Neurosci. Bridesmaid Speech! Abstr. 13, 286.10. Leo Pezzementi, Ellen Reinheimer and to the new world, Maureen Pezzementi. Best! 1985. New World! Acetylcholinesterase from lamprey skeletal muscle is found in best bridesmaid speech globular and to the, asymmetric forms.
Soc. Neurosci. Speech! Abstr. Songs! 11, 12.17. Leo Pezzementi. 1984. Acetylcholinesterase from the skeletal muscle of the lamprey. 1984. Soc. Neurosci. Abstr. 10, 140.7.
Mark Schneider, Bih-Hwa Shieh, Leo Pezzementi and speech, Jakob Schmidt. 1983. Backmasked! The effect of trifluoperazine on best bridesmaid AChR synthesis in cultured chick myotubes. Soc. In India! Neurosci. Abstr. 9, 18.1. Bih-Hwa Shieh, Leo Pezzementi and Jakob Schmidt. 1982.
Membrane potential and the regulation of AChR synthesis in embryonic chick skeletal muscle cells. Bridesmaid! Soc. Victorian! Neurosci. Abstr . 8, 205.9. Leo Pezzementi and Jakob Schmidt. Bridesmaid Speech! 1981. Acetylcholine receptor synthesis of chick skeletal muscle cell cultures is altered by ryanodine.
Soc. Acars Systems! Neurosci. Best Bridesmaid Speech! Abstr. 7, 259.4.
Essay No Plagiarism - Awesome Maid of Honor Speech Examples - Updated Oct 2017 - SUNY Old Westbury
Buy College Essays Online Сheap and Quickly - This Maid of Honor Speech will blow your mind! - YouTube - University of Wisconsin Madison, Madison, WI
Nov 22, 2017 Best bridesmaid speech,
Shooting Holes in best bridesmaid speech Wounding Theories: III. Myths, Misconceptions and Miscalculations. If I haven't already gotten someone into a stew with what I've said so far, I'm certain to do so now. I want to examine some very popular myths, misconceptions and miscalculations of terminal effects with a view to demonstrating not only why they are not true, but also to account for the phenomena which caused them to be formulated. Backmasked Songs. I think that's fair. If I can't explain to your satisfaction the observed phenomena that supports your favorite stopping power theory, I can't ask you to best bridesmaid, ditch it. III.
A. Victorian Novelists. The Mythology of best speech, Wound Lethality. III. Essay On Mark Bixler's The Lost Boys Of Sudan. A. Speech. i. Kinetic Energy, Part I: Energy Dump, Overpenetration and Hydrostatic Shock I lump together energy dump theories, the concept of overpenetration and the arguments involving the term hydrostatic shock because they all tend to share a common idea, which is that the literacy in india, abrupt deposition of the kinetic energy of the bullet is responsible for its lethality. I don't wish to be misunderstood and we are in danger of bridesmaid, this discussion being taken for a mere matter of semantics, so let me be clear: the salient point is that the songs, adherants of these views are fixated on the idea of the rapid transfer of energy to the target, rather than on the mechanics of the work being done by the bullet in terms of wounding (i.e., penetration and cavitation). Specifically, in the extreme, some such advocates have emphasized the temporary cavity produced by the bullet with little regard for the permanent cavity created. There is a prevalent belief that a bullet which remains inside a target is more effective in terms of stopping or killing power than one which completely penetrates; the idea being that all of the best bridesmaid, kinetic energy has been spent inside the game animal. It seems reasonable. Why wouldn't it be true? This belief is not new. Colonel Townsend Whelen writes in his very illuminating treatise, Small Arms Design and Ballistics , that the thought at that time was that the ideal bullet should just shoot through the animal to novelists, its opposite side, and lodge under the bridesmaid, skin without penetrating clear through, thus expending all its energy on the beast (p.
137). The time he is describing is the latter half of the 19th century when the weapons were rifles of .45 caliber, shooting a bullet of literacy, 350 to 550 grains and with a charge of black powder sufficient to give it a muzzle velocity of from speech, 1300 to 1500 fps (p. 136). Even in these early days of ballistics inquiry the significance of kinetic energy was being examined. Unfortunately the conclusion reached by some is mistaken, or at the very least misdirected.
It is interesting that the 19th century model of energy dump required the bullet to in india, completely pass through the body, but stop under the skin on the off-side; combining the features of an energy dump with lethal penetration and bridesmaid cavitation. If such arguments invariably took this position there would be little or nothing to argue against. The arguments heard today have been around for decades. Consider the following excerpt from an article written by mr.chips novel, (then) Major Charles Askins Jr. Bridesmaid. of the US Border Patrol that appeared in the November 1930 issue of The American Rifleman : Let a man tell what he considers ideal penetration, and he will state that is where a bullet goes through an animal, lodging in the skin on the opposite side. He doesn't like to say that the bullet went entirely through, making a big hole on the opposite side, and going on, because he very well knows that the bullet would then be expending part of the patriarchy, energy after it got through.
He is best bridesmaid speech, obsessed with the conviction that the missile must spend all of its energy within the patriarchy vs matriarchy, beast, or else it is a defective bullet. Now, with some misgivings I question the wisdom of all this. I believe that if we could have a bullet which would pass entirely through the game - a brown bear, say - and best make a hole on the other side as big as your two fists, we'd get that bear. Same thing with anything else we shot. There are at least two contemporary variations on the energy dump premise. Dracula: The Impaler. The principal argument seems to center on the concept of overpenetration, which is essentially the same thought as expressed in the 19th century but with the added evidence of actual results from gunfights on the street (the chief culprit being the speech, rather pointed 9 mm FMJ bullet). Bullets which overpenetrate do not stop opponents as readily as those that remain in the body, it is backmasked songs, alleged. Therefore, if the energy isn't wasted on exit, the bullet is more effective. Right? Not necessarily. It depends on the target as well as the load under consideration.
A bullet of a given construction and impact velocity will create a cavity of best bridesmaid speech, predictable dimensions over its path, whether it stops or penetrates completely. Therefore, if the hole created can penetrate all the way through, it causes more damage than if it stops at some point. Obviously, we can have a bullet that expands even more violently than this (or disintegrates) and which will never exit the target of interest. How would it compare to the foregoing case of (let us say) controlled expansion? The critical issue here is mr.chips novel, what sort of hole are we making, not whether it goes all the way through. Best Bridesmaid Speech. Overpenetration is a misnomer.
The ineffective stopping attributed to overpenetration of handgun bullets (to the extent that its even fair criticism) is actually caused by vs matriarchy, inadequate cavitation (not surprisingly for a pointed FMJ). Let's make a practical comparison of extremes. Consider a .41 Magnum load with a 280 grain LBT-style WFN hard cast bullet with an impact velocity of 1400 fps. Now, comprare this load with a .224 caliber 55 grain Nosler Ballistic-Tip having an impact velocity of 2800 fps. These two loads have exactly the same kinetic energy at impact: 957 ft-lbs. However, their respective terminal behaviors are very different. At this velocity, the 55 grain Ballistic Tip would not exit anything larger than a varmint, say a coyote. The .41 Magnum load will easily break both shoulders on an elk and exit. Between these two loads, the best bridesmaid, .224 Ballistic Tip would be the better performer on victorian novelists, smaller game (or human targets), but I am confident that the advocacy for best bridesmaid speech, its use on game such as elk and bear would be very much in the minority, and patriarchy rightly so.
It would definitely deliver more energy to bridesmaid speech, the target, but its effectiveness would suffer from inadequate penetration. So, the energy deposition in the target is not the sole or even the primary determinant of the utility of the load. If there were an ideal case from the standpoint of in india, efficiency , I suppose it would be for a bullet which completely, but just barely, penetrated and fell to the ground. One must appreciate the difference between efficiency and effectiveness. (The engine tunings of dragsters are not efficient!) In this case the bullet has done all the best bridesmaid speech, damage that it can do to mr.chips novel, that particular target at that particular angle of entry. The problem here, of course, is that one cannot predict the exact size and bridesmaid speech toughness of the game encountered, or the exact range, which would have to be known in order to achieve the precise impact velocity required for ideal efficiency.
All of these uncertainties drive bullet loads to exceed the minimum performance, and this is accomplished by designing a bullet that will create an adequate cavity while deeply penetrating over a wide range of impact velocities. Naturally, at some ranges the bullet may exit with considerable residual velocity. This wasted energy is irrelevant if the wound is adequate. At this point I again call attention to my previously stated definition of adequate, namely a wound track of victorian, 0.75 to 1.00 inches (19 to 25 mm) in diameter through heart, lungs or major arteries. A smaller hole through major arteries only (for example) will kill, but the game may run a significant distance and be lost. It is best, also infinitely more difficult to track wounded game without a blood trail than with one that looks as if it were painted with a roller, and entrance wounds rarely bleed much. A larger cavity at shallow depth may drop a game animal instantly, but what is gained by less than 25 to 100 yards at the risk of an inadequate wound if a difficult angle is involved or major bones intervene or the bullet self-destructs unpredictably? There are circumstances in which reducing that distance is crucial and others in which an exiting bullet can be a liability. It is not a cut and dried issue.
In general though, I have come to believe that most experienced hunters prefer a generous exit wound. One could devote a lengthy essay to the ethical considerations of the contemporary hunter, vis-a-vis what was acceptable in times past. In the 19th century skilled hunters, who hunted for subsistence, would put their bullet through the heart or lungs and if the game ran half a mile they could still bag it. For most of us, times have changed. We lack the tracking skills of our forebears and the moral justification to use marginally effective weapons. Personally, I hold the one-shot instant kill as my ideal and therefore absolute reliability and predictability in terminal performance.
The point that I have attempted to press here (perhaps in a rambling fashion) is backmasked songs, that complete penetration is not something to avoid in the hunting field. Best. In fact there is good evidence that through and through wounds cause collapse quicker in vs matriarchy many instances. Tactical considerations concerning penetration are a different matter entirely. Best Bridesmaid Speech. Bullets such as the Glaser Safety Slug were designed primarily with tactical considerations in mind, rather than optimal wounding. Mr.chips Novel. Glasers are designed not to penetrate aircraft or sheetrock walls, or to exit from the body of the target and endanger someone immediately behind. Glasers and similar such designs create extremely effective wounds if they do not have to penetrate deeply in order to reach the best bridesmaid speech, vitals of the target. However, it is this end of the design spectrum that is problematic. Taken in its extreme, were the mere deposition of energy by any mechanism or in any fashion the sole object of bullet design, then it would be fairly simple to backmasked, design a bullet that would never exit practically any target. It would be extremely frangible in bridesmaid speech construction and the impaler provide very shallow penetration.
In fact, it need not penetrate at all. Consider a hypothetical example of two projectiles with equal kinetic energies. One is a 1 lb gel-filled bag launched at 60 fps. The other is a 490 gr broadhead arrow travelling at 225 fps. Both have a kinetic energy of 55 ft-lbs. Best Speech. Which would you rather be hit by?
The kinetic energy of the gel-filled bag would be completely absorbed on impact, probably causing a painful contusion; but it wouldn't kill unless it just happened to break your neck. The arrow would easily and the impaler completely penetrate a human torso from any angle and best speech continue travelling with residual energy, but prove highly lethal. However, one might object, we're only considering a mere 55 ft-lbs. What happens when the energy levels are comparable to that of a high powered rifle? An excellent counter-point. (Apparently I confused some in the past, so here is songs, a clearer explanation) Assume 3000 ft-lbs of kinetic energy, about that of a .338 caliber, 250 grain Nosler Partition fired from a .338 Winchester Magnum with a remaining velocity of 2325 fps at speech 100 yards or so; well within its effective range for lethal dispatch on large game - in fact, an extremely effective load.
This equates, in strict energy terms, to a tackle by a 225 pound defensive end moving at patriarchy vs matriarchy 20 mph (29.3 fps). That sounds like quite a smackdown and I daresay it would clobber most people and speech a lot of big game, but its also rarely injurious, let alone fatal. It is not the 3000 ft-lbs of energy itself that kills, it is the character of the work done by it. Another example of the fallacy of the energy dump theory of stopping power is one from my own experience. Mr.chips Novel. I once shot a thin metal screen with my 41 Magnum (210 gr. Best Speech. HP, 1350 fps, 850 ft-lbs) at a very close range ( do not try this at mr.chips novel home!). The bullet was completely stopped; it lay on the ground in best bridesmaid speech front of the mesh screen. The screen apparently had completely absorbed all of the kinetic energy of the bullet.
However, the backmasked songs, screen suffered no serious damage; there was only a faint depression where the bullet had struck and glanced. What actually occurred is that the best bridesmaid speech, screen gave against some tall grass when impacted and novelists caught the bullet like a catcher's mitt. When I attempted to reproduce this spectacular behavior for a friend of mine, the screen was supported so that it did not give and was easily perforated by the bullets. This last example from personal experience graphically demonstrates why the energy dump premise is fundamentally flawed. In the former case the screen (with the assistance of some grass) completely absorbed the kinetic energy and best received no damage; in the latter it was penetrated with energy to spare. You would observe a similar result if the victorian, target were wearing body armor (admittedly, the aramid fiber absorbs part of the energy and aids in distributing the applied forces over speech a larger area, but the same would hold true if skin had the mechanical characteristics of victorian, aramid fiber).
I wouldn't suggest that game animals or unprotected people can absorb 3000 ft-lbs of kinetic energy instantaneously (and this is essential) with complete impunity. Moreover, I can think of no hunting bullets for rifles today which do not provide adequate penetration under most circumstances within the best bridesmaid speech, impact velocity range and against the game for which they are intended. Literacy. But there are frangible bullets composed of compressed metal powders for use in best bridesmaid confined shooting ranges which disintegrate upon impact, expending all of their kinetic energy without penetrating, and these are not suitable for hunting, although they may inflict wounds which are ultimately fatal (from infection or secondary consequences such as starvation). Kinetic energy deposition alone is not what is sought after. Experienced hunters will affirm that deep penetration into the vitals, coupled with an adequate degree of destructive cavitation is essential for success in the field. Mr.chips Novel. Varmint bullets and most match bullets likewise are demonstrated miserable performers on big game, although under ideal conditions (missing all heavy bones on a clear broadside lung shot) they can kill spectacularly against smaller bodied deer and antelope. Hit the shoulder bones or angle the shot from the rear and it is bridesmaid, often ruinous. However, one should not assume from this that kinetic energy means nothing, or is somehow unrelated to literacy, wounding potential. Clearly, the naked human torso (and that of even large and tough game) is far more capable of absorbing a low velocity impact than the kinetic energy of a rifle bullet.
The rate of energy transfer to the target is vastly more important than the best, quantity of energy transferred. Victorian. This is the technical definition of power. Anyone sunbathing on a clear summer day at the beach will receive an best bridesmaid speech, irradiance equivalent to over 4600 ft-lbs every minute. Eventually, this bombardment by extremely high energy particles will result in sunburn, but the body can withstand the energy it receives because it is spread over a large area and songs arrives at a relatively slow rate (compared with bullets). The power and best bridesmaid intensity (power per unit area) is much less than ballistic events. The other popular contemporary misconception results from the belief that the rapid transfer of the kinetic energy of the bullet thereby kills instantaneously through hydrostatic shock. This term gets used rather loosely to describe quite a lot of things, including some actual wound mechanics, but for mr.chips novel, the sake of the following discussion I confine my reference to purported effects induced far from the best, wound cavity that are attributable to a shocking effect ascribed to certain bullets or loads.
I don't know where this term originated, but it is novelists, pseudoscientific slang. Best Bridesmaid Speech. In the first place, these are dynamic - not static - events. Moreover, hydrostatic shock is an oxymoron. Shock, in the technical sense, indicates a mechanical wave travelling in excess of the inherent sound speed of the material; it can't be static. This may be a flow related wave like a bow shock on the nose of vs matriarchy, a bullet in air or it may be a supersonic acoustic wave travelling through a solid. In terms of bullets striking tissue, shock is never encountered.
The sound speed of muscle tissue has been measured to best speech, be about novelists, 5150 fps, and that of fatty tissue around 4920 fps ( A Cavitation Model for Kinetic Energy Projectiles Penetrating Gelatin , Henry C. Dubin, BRL Memorandum Report No. Bridesmaid. 2423, US Army Ballistic Research Laboratories, December 1974). Even varmint bullets do not have an impact velocity this high, let alone a penetration velocity exceeding 4900 fps. Unless the literacy in india, bullet can penetrate faster than the inherent sound speed of the medium through which it is passing, you will not observe a shock wave. Instead, the bullet impact produces an acoustic wave which moves ahead of the speech, penetration. The initial acoustic wave causes no damage (it has been observed in testing passing harmlessly in advance of the backmasked, bullet's path). Some people use shock in the colloquial sense to describe a violent impact, but it is confusing, especially in connection with the term hydrostatic and best bridesmaid speech lends undeserved quasi-scientific merit to the slang. It also tends to get confused with the medical expression attending trauma. In India. We are not describing what is meant by shock to the medical profession. The word shock should never appear in a gun journal, in my opinion. Before I become too dogmatic and overstate the bridesmaid speech, situation, let me concede that there may be some merit to backmasked songs, the idea that hydrodynamic (not hydrostatic) impulse created by bullets which have a high kinetic energy (or perhaps simply a high velocity) and speech generally exhibit violent cavitation (or merely generate local pressures of a certain magnitude in combination with specific shotlines), can cause some secondary effects due to pressure on the nervous system or circulatory system.
In addition to the pressure induced cranial hemorrhage described previously, it is possible to kill manually by mr.chips novel, nerve strangulation. In this case actual damage to the central nervous system is not caused, but the best bridesmaid speech, signals governing the mr.chips novel, heart or diaphragm are shut off, resulting in instantaneous unconsciousness or even death. This sort of thing makes for lurid mythology in best bridesmaid speech the martial arts and bad movies, but there is some real science behind it. Certain rare sports fatalities have been definitely attributed to patriarchy, a swift blow which interrupts the cardiac rhythm. Acoustic pressure on the spine can also cause temporary paralysis. These phenomena may account for the rapid effectiveness of some high-velocity hollow-point pistol bullet wounds, especially in best bridesmaid cases in which the victim is Bixler's Boys of Sudan, not mortally wounded and recovers consciousness within a few minutes. Some special handgun loads (e.g., the THV bullet) have been designed allegedly to achieve this result. Unfortunately, this is an unreliable mechanism of incapacitation, generally obtained at the expense of effective penetration. No bullet yet designed will produce this rapid shocking effect on demand because it depends more on the hit location and perhaps even the timing of the hit than it does on best speech, the design characteristics or velocity of the bullet. Patriarchy Vs Matriarchy. Many of the best bridesmaid speech, handgun bullets designed to use this effect can be defeated by common barriers, such as glass, sheetrock, and even clothing.
More to the point, its less a matter of the bullet than the specific aimpoint. Doing this deliberately by hand, even with a profound understanding of the mechanism and vital points, is extremely uncertain; using the passage of a pressure wave from literacy, a bullet to accomplish this falls into speech, the freak event category. Such is never an acceptable mechanism for backmasked songs, the hunter. On the bridesmaid speech, other hand, as I have alluded to previously, some contemporary bullet designs (e.g., Nosler Ballistic Tip) as well as some renowned performers from years past (e.g., the original 130 grain bullet of the .270 Winchester and literacy in india the Remington Bronze Point) achieve a high percentage of instantaneous kills by blowing to bridesmaid speech, bits and songs never exiting the game. I find this interesting in view of the current obsession with avoiding bullets in which the lead cores separate from the jacket. There are few situations in which simple slip separation (core and jacket traveling forward together) would be disadvantageous, although complete separation invariably leaves the jacket behind, makes the core vulnerable to premature fragmentation and can cause a very abrupt termination of penetration. Speech. But returning to backmasked songs, the issue, the successful frangible bullet designs nevertheless always penetrate to the vitals and have never been regarded as reliable for rear raking shots requiring deep penetration or against very tough heavy game and most knowledgeable authorities prefer bullets which exhibit modest cavitation with deep penetration because of their flexibility in bridesmaid speech the field. In conclusion, if kinetic energy merely being imparted to the target is not inherently indicative of on Mark Bixler's Boys, lethality, what can kinetic energy tell us about best speech, a load?
Well, the songs, essential questions are what sort of bullet are we discussing, at what impact velocity and against what sort of target? Considering all of that, though, kinetic energy can be a good indicator of the potential for cavitation when coupled with the best bridesmaid, proper bullet. III. A. ii. Momentum and Stopping Power There is another branch of armchair ballistics which favors the use of patriarchy vs matriarchy, momentum as a raw measure of speech, stopping power. I confess that I was long enamored of dracula:, this view because it seemed to give more credit to lower velocity big-bore cartridges that were strong performers than the kinetic energy story told, but momentum alone is best bridesmaid speech, equally inadequate to describe terminal behavior and the arguments given in victorian novelists support of that view are as full of blue sky nonsense as any claim made of kinetic energy.
The old African hunters talked of stoppers which would cause a charging pachyderm to halt its forward progress in its tracks and stand stock still in a daze. This situation applied only to (if you carefully note the speech, details) the truly huge weapons such as the 8 and 4 bore blackpowder rifles and later .577 and .600 Nitro Expresses when fired into the spongy skull of an elephant, but when the brain is closely missed. In this case, the mr.chips novel, impact of the blow was literally sufficient to stagger the animal. It is to be noted, however, that these ancient blackpowder weapons could only be used by men of best speech, considerable size and strength and even they dreaded pulling the trigger. Frederick Courteney Selous says that using such weapons crippled him and Sir Samuel Baker foreswore such things as soon as he developed guns and victorian loads capable of best bridesmaid, dependable penetration, preferring the literacy in india, far less punishing 10 bore! Unless you hunt elephant with these antique monsters, and I don't know of anyone alive who does, then stopping an animal in this sense isn't a matter of concern. From what I've read, one cannot depend upon a similar effect on the remarkably tough Cape buffalo until something like a .577 NE is used (if then), and then a well aimed shot will penetrate clean through end to end, so that its really not the same scenario at all. Proper stopping of a charge depends on speech, shot placement.
Similar rules apply to songs, human targets. The human frame is best speech, so lightly constructed that any stopper class weapon will easily penetrate through even after encountering major bones. Here we have a case of massive trauma, not stopping as a result of an impact by a magnum or a big-bore powerhouse. Again, the force of the blow is songs, comparable to the recoil of the speech, gun. It has to be. That's physics. In either case the bullet is acting under high acceleration loads over a short distance. Naturally, bullets which penetrate completely do not deliver the same impact as those that come to rest (ie, solids are felt less strongly than soft points).
There are always anecdotal accounts (invariably told by those who have never shot anyone) of people being hurled off their feet by a .45 ACP using hardball when pathetic little .38 Special bullets are shrugged off without effect. In actuality, there are quite as many incidents of people shrugging off .45 slugs as for many lesser calibers. It is hypothetically possible for the impact to cause a pressure pulse of mr.chips novel, such magnitude through the bridesmaid speech, body of the mr.chips novel, target, that it is best bridesmaid, instantly killed (notice I deliberately avoided the word shock). This happens, for example, when you shoot a chipmunk with a .30-`06, even if the chipmunk wears body armor. It doesn't happen often (if ever) against big game and humans with ordinary (ie, shoulder fired) weapons (NOTE: I'm not referring here to hits against the central nervous system, or to mr.chips novel, any hit which results in a penetration; only to hits which could kill exclusively from the force of the bridesmaid speech, impact). I haven't yet seen any cases in which a wound that did not reach to the vital organs resulted in death - except as a result of Bixler's The Lost Boys, septicemia. What this means is that if all of the momentum of a high-powered rifle bullet were delivered by a non-penetrating blow, the damage inflicted on any game larger than a small varmint would be relatively insignificant. I've asked people who have been shot to describe their sensations of being shot, physical reactions, etc. The common response is that the impact feels precisely like the bridesmaid speech, impact of a punch.
It is not any more impressive. This is consistent with other testimony that I have read, and serves as a useful analogy for argument. A punch is in india, not staggering unless it also causes debilitating damage, usually to the brain, but alternatively to the lungs, etc. Best Bridesmaid Speech. - or in the case of the victim being surprised, off balance, etc. The impact of a bullet behaves according to similar constraints, all things being relative (ie, a .458 Winchester Magnum causes relatively more of an Essay Bixler's Boys, impact to bridesmaid speech, a man than to an elephant because of the size difference, assuming the patriarchy vs matriarchy, force of the impact is absorbed in both cases). The actual momentum transfer of a typical hunting bullet is slightly less than that of the gel-filled 1 lb bag previously described, and best if one were wearing body armor to slow the absorbtion of energy at impact, that is what would be felt - a good solid thump. With the body armor one's body absorbs all of the kinetic energy and momentum without harm, without it the bullet penetrates and exits using only a portion of its kinetic energy and momentum but delivers a lethal wound. Interestingly, in dracula: the case of body armor, the bridesmaid, impulse is backmasked songs, higher than if the bullet penetrates and exits, yet it is intuitively apparent which of bridesmaid, these two scenarios is the impaler, lethal and speech which is insignificant. Were that not the case, then body armor would be ineffective. Many readers will doubt the truth of this assertion. Some will say, I have actually seen a deer do a complete somersault!.
Many people have, but it wasn't caused by the force of the impact. For the skeptical among you, if you require proof that the Essay The Lost Boys, spectacular flips often reported are merely an apparent effect of the bullet impact, I challenge you to best bridesmaid speech, rent a video of the impaler, dangerous game hunting in Africa and observe the effect of best bridesmaid speech, bullet impact on downed, already dead, animals when the victorian novelists, insurance shot is made. Best Bridesmaid Speech. This practice isn't carried out on Bixler's The Lost Boys, deer and bridesmaid speech it separates the effect of the bullet from the victorian novelists, effect of the living animal. Lions and even buffalo may seem to flip high in the air, but if they are dead the bodies only quiver ever so slightly; its barely visible, and these are shots through the most massive shoulder and spinal bones, delivering the greatest resistance and speech impact with very powerful rifles. Alternatively, you can perform a penetration test into victorian novelists, wet phonebooks that completely absorbs the impact in best speech a manner very similar to a game animal. I have shot 28 inches of mr.chips novel, saturated phonebooks in a plastic tub (weighing approximately 80 lbs - comparable to a small deer) with a .340 Weatherby Magnum firing a 225 grain bullet at best bridesmaid 2900 fps (at ten feet). The wetpack did not budge, although the plastic tub rested on a smooth surface.
More recently, that same load was used to kill a springbok in Namibia. My first shot seemed to Essay Bixler's The Lost of Sudan, crush the diminutive antelope in its tracks. After perhaps a half a minute or more the animal staggered to its feet and began to graze, though bleeding profusely from its wound unawares. Speech. I shot it lengthwise of its body. Vs Matriarchy. It did not move at all this time, but after a few seconds it pitched over bridesmaid speech sideways, stiff-legged and dead.
Same load, but the numbed beast did not feel the second impact, even though the vs matriarchy, bullet did not exit. I have conducted the same test into a wetpack using a .458 Winchester Magnum firing a 500 grain bullet with the same result - no movement. Competitive shooters in the sport of metallic silhouette are quite familiar with this. The big 200 meter rams weigh about 25 kg or 55 lb, but can be toppled over by most of the more powerful cartridges. We're talking about, at most, a 220 grain bullet at say 2000 fps or a 150 grain bullet at bridesmaid speech maybe 2500 fps. So, now if we move those bullets along at only a few hundred more fps, to about 2500 fps and 3000 fps, respectively, they aren't suddenly going to acquire the ability to take an animal weighing ten times as much and throw it into the air. Songs. There is some force imparted, but its just not that dramatic. A big .375 Holland Holland delivers more wallop than a .30-06 Springfield, but even a .577 Tyrannosaur has less than five times the momentum of a .30-06 - we are a long way from the best bridesmaid speech, kind of backmasked, values necessary to produce the effects claimed. Again, its comparable to the recoil.
The same fallacy as seen with kinetic energy dump theories can be demonstrated with respect to momentum-based stopping power theories by substituting a 3 lb spear moving at 50 fps alongside a 3 lb gel-filled plastic bag moving at the same velocity. Now we have two projectiles with exactly the same masses and momentum. Intuitively, we can evaluate the relative lethality of these two weapons without field testing. Incidentally, these both produce the same momentum as a .458 Winchester Magnum loaded with 500 grain bullets. The .458 Winchester Magnum is a heavy hitter. Do you think that a Cape buffalo would be staggered by the mere impact of a 3 lb gel-filled bag? A haymaker punch (15 fps), using about 50% of the body weight of a 180 lb man would have a kinetic energy of about 300 ft-lbs, but a momentum over eight times greater than that of a .458 Winchester Magnum or .450 Rigby Nitro Express; indeed a hard swift jab (50 fps) would have a kinetic energy of still only about 350 ft-lbs, but a momentum almost three times greater than the standard in stopping class rifles! I wouldn't even dream of punching a Cape buffalo. So, stepping aside from the bridesmaid speech, idea that stopping power is a function of momentum, what can we ascertain from the relative momentum of in india, a particular load?
Does it convey anything? Well, without knowing the specific bullet (caliber, brand, design, etc) and bridesmaid the impact velocity, we can't make absolute statements about performance. However, that aside, momentum is in backmasked general terms a good measure of the potential for penetration. This potential will only be realized with the proper bullet and, as will be shown in the next article in this series, a relatively mild handgun load can easily penetrate more than a very potent rifle load with more than twice the momentum. But, high momentum can translate into deep penetration with the right bullet. III. A. Speech. iii. Kinetic Energy, Part 2: Thresholds of Wounding Potential Based on Kinetic Energy. I think it was the sage and revered (and great favorite of mine) Col. Victorian Novelists. Townsend Whelen who first proposed the idea that modern sporting arms ought to deliver at least 1000 ft-lbs of kinetic energy on the target for quick dispatch of deer and 2000 ft-lbs for larger species such as elk (Craig Boddington, American Hunting Rifles , Safari Press, 1995, pg. 20).
This guidance has been reiterated for probably half a century or more now, but the world of smallbore ballistics today is very different than in the days when the esteemed Colonel was at the forefront of best speech, modern military small arms development with the U. S. Army Ordnance Department. Patriarchy Vs Matriarchy. Moreover, here is what he had to say in his own treatise on the subject of Killing Power over seventy years ago: The killing power of a bullet in flight depends entirely upon the average size of the wound it makes in best bridesmaid speech the animal, and upon nothing else. The size of the wound in turn depends upon the size, weight, construction, and shape of the victorian novelists, bullet, and the velocity with which it strikes, and upon no other details. . We frequently see it stated that the killing power of a cartridge depends upon its energy, and tables of the properties of best bridesmaid, cartridges often give the energy of each. Now energy depends upon the weight of the bullet times its velocity, and on backmasked songs, nothing else, and thus can have only a very distant bearing on our subject. Bridesmaid. (Townsend Whelen, The Hunting Rifle , Stackpole Sons, 1940, pg. 236) An important fact to remember is that not all energy is created equal. What this ultimately means is that a kinetic energy value used as a measure or threshold for lethality is practically meaningless. The character of the work done by a certain quantity of on Mark, kinetic energy will be dependent upon the mass, construction and velocity of the projectile. In other words, 1000 ft-lbs of kinetic energy generated by a slow-moving rock is not as lethal as that of a bullet.
Furthermore, the damage actually caused by a lesser amount of kinetic energy may easily exceed that caused by a greater quantity of kinetic energy! Expressed differently, kinetic energy has quality as well as quantity. This is easier to understand in terms of heat energy, which has temperature (degrees F or C) as well as quantity (BTUs or Joules). Kinetic energy is governed by speech, similar laws. As further evidence of this fact, observe that when terminal ballistic experiments are scaled the velocity is held constant. Kinetic energy, mass and the dimensions are scaled, but velocity is not. Vs Matriarchy. In like manner pure water at standard pressure boils at 100° C, regardless of quantity. A small amount of water does not boil at a lower temperature than a larger amount.
The heat required to bring a quantity of water to a boil is directly proportional to the mass of the bridesmaid speech, water (just as the kinetic energy is proportional to the volume of dracula: the impaler, displacement by a bullet), but the character of the work done on the water by best bridesmaid, that heat energy is determined by the temperature it produces. Backmasked Songs. It is velocity, not kinetic energy, which is the quantity of greatest interest in best bridesmaid the terminal ballistics of small arms. Since a knowledge of the velocity and projectile construction is essential to evaluating the character of the kinetic energy and its wounding potential, simply relying on a quantity of energy can be quite misleading. The way in which a sporting bullet (say, a 7 mm 140 gr spitzer boat-tail at an impact velocity of 3000 fps) expends its first 1000 ft-lbs of kinetic energy on literacy in india, a target (from 2797 ft-lbs to bridesmaid speech, 1797 ft-lbs) will little resemble the way in which it expends its last 1000 ft-lbs (at an impact velocity of 1794 fps, where it will most likely fail to deform and simply drill straight through causing a neat little hole with negligible cavitation). In the former case, a lung shot would result in a wide wound track and a gaping exit wound as it exits the body at 2405 fps, but cause rapid collapse; in the latter case even a lengthwise shot which fully absorbed the energy of the mr.chips novel, projectile would probably mean a lost game animal because of the low probability of causing rapid hemorrhage. Interestingly, in the former case probably 20% or more of best speech, that kinetic energy would be lost to on Mark Bixler's The Lost Boys, deformation of the bullet, whereas in speech the latter case all of it would be delivered to the target. However, that same 1000 ft-lbs of energy delivered by Essay Bixler's, a .41 caliber 280 gr LBT-WFN flatnosed hard-cast bullet at speech 1268 fps would quickly drop a bull elk with the same lung or lengthwise shot because its larger diameter and strong flat nose would create a large diameter and deep wound even after smashing through heavy shoulder bones. (Incidentally, this misunderstanding is not confined to the ballistics of sporting arms. I have encountered the notion in recent years in my profession of songs, a tank killing threshold of 10 MJ.) A popular term among some gun buffs is best speech, (or once was) the foot-ton, a magical quanta of kinetic energy that is supposed to translate into all sorts of killing authority. Aside from the problem described above in mr.chips novel assigning an arbitrary kinetic energy level for lethality against a type of game, there is the matter of best, unit definitions.
If you like to think of it as the energy required to raise a one ton block a distance of patriarchy, one foot, that would be correct (again, not necessarily the same as being crushed by that falling block!). Forget the comparison to automobile impacts. Two foot-tons of kinetic energy does not equate with the impact of a full-size sedan. However, simply because an arbitrary quantity of bridesmaid speech, kinetic energy is on Mark Bixler's of Sudan, not, in and of itself, sufficient to describe the wounding characteristics of our weapons does not imply that kinetic energy is not a valid measure of ballistic performance. We need not be reactionary or worse yet suppose that someone got it wrong and best that what we need is a better formula for kinetic energy. This truly novel and disturbing misconception was once highlighted in the impaler a feature article, the essence of which was that kinetic energy is simply the best bridesmaid speech, arbitrary fabrication of some gun writer, not based on physical laws, and is fundamentally incorrect. Reading something like this, its as if the cancerous pseudoscience of gun writers has spread to dracula: the impaler, corrupt even the hallowed precepts of true science. I shouldn't make it seem as if the bridesmaid speech, author of this particular article were alone in his assumptions. The history of dracula: the impaler, popular terminal ballistics in best bridesmaid the 20th century saw several examples of this kind of crackpot science, such as Elmer Keith's ridiculous invention of pounds-feet.
What is most astounding about particular outrage against victorian novelists, science and clear reasoning is that the (long since departed) editors of the magazine didn't know enough themselves to prevent its publication. Bridesmaid. I expect this sort of thing in cyberspace, where ignorance abounds, but I expect a higher standard from publishers (incidentally, the present editorial staff has a much more scientifically founded perspective). Men like Townsend Whelen knew their basic science and would not have made such errors, nor permitted them to be published in literacy in india their journal. It troubles me that our knowledge has diminished so much in bridesmaid 70 years. When gun writers attempt to describe terminal ballistics in The Lost Boys terms more technical than wallop they take on the mantle of science and speech bear the responsibility to their readership to convey an accurate discussion of the mechanisms involved. Science does not merely belong to scientists nor only in on Mark The Lost Boys the realm of the scientific journal. It is truth on a fundamental level.
There are no everyday meanings to best, terms such as velocity, momentum, kinetic energy and mr.chips novel impulse. They are not slang or jargon used to describe nebulous, ill-defined concepts. They hold precise meanings. To carelessly misuse scientific language is to render a disservice to the readership, even though it be predominately composed of non-technical readers. Before going any further let me make an best speech, apology to the reader. This article and the letter exchange is now ancient history.
It was not my intent then nor is it now to pillory anyone. I wrote my own letters to the editor of the magazine at the time in mr.chips novel hopes of inspiring a more fastidious editorship in terms of technical matter. I feel justified in rehashing the best speech, argument in cyberspace because it represents a viewpoint with which I suspect many reasonably educated shooters would sympathize - and I don't mean my viewpoint! I understand that much of vs matriarchy, what I am pressing here seems arcane and unimportant to most shooters. But the speech, integrity of such concepts is the fundamental underpinning to all ballistics, the mr.chips novel, technology on which we depend.
Is it necessary for the average shooter to understand all these concepts and best be thoroughly conversant? No, it is not. However, when they are discussed, the discussion needs to be scientifically correct. I guess I expect too much and mr.chips novel perhaps I am being too critical, but whether the average Joe understands the ins and outs of physics is not the issue - its the attitude that accredited science is no better than hip-pocket hooey that bothers me. Its the attitude that science is based on opinion, rather than fact. Best. Its the same mentality that has lead to the wholesale disrespect of literacy in india, science in America, and that has allowed a culture to flourish with notions such as New Age mysticism, literalist religious extremism trumping science in the classroom and denial of global warming despite undeniable evidence. Those who throw around quasi-technical terms without understanding them only create confusion. Velocity is speech, not impulse. It is not like impulse.
Kinetic energy is not momentum and velocity combined. Momentum will not describe the load with the hardest thump. There is no room in true science for a private opinion about songs, a better definition of energy, and best bridesmaid those who ask Is the ft-lb an accurate KE label? should not be published. This kind of mr.chips novel, tabloid quality science is bridesmaid, overtaking the Essay on Mark Bixler's The Lost, firearms community. In the age of bioengineering, quantum electronics and relativistic physics, the firearms community is becoming mired in a level of scientific ignorance comparable to Medieval Europe. The truth is bridesmaid, not marketable but crackpot theories about the impaler, better formulas for kinetic energy warrant feature articles.
Falsehood and error need to be corrected. Best Bridesmaid. Those of us who care about the quality of the literature and the accuracy of the inquiry into terminal ballistics bear the responsibility to repudiate the nonsense and to songs, authoritatively instruct concerning the bridesmaid speech, facts. Since this has proved to backmasked songs, be a pitfall for some I will unravel the mystery. The definition of best speech, energy is based upon physical laws. A ft-lb is a valid unit of kinetic energy - by definition. There is nothing to songs, prove. The unit definition has nothing to do with antiquated perspectives on energy. Kinetic energy is calculated as (1/2) mass times velocity squared.
But pounds are actually a unit of force (i.e., weight), which is mass times acceleration (due to best bridesmaid, gravity in this case). So, to get kinetic energy we must divide by 32.174 ft/s 2 , which reduces the velocity squared terms of ft 2 /s 2 simply to feet. This leaves units that correspond to another definition of energy, being force times distance. Its really only confusing in the old English system of The Lost Boys of Sudan, units because we normally think of pounds as mass rather than as force; in metric its obvious that all forms of energy are the best bridesmaid speech, same thing because they are all in Joules or kg-m 2 /s 2 . Just in case somebody doesn't know, foot-pounds are a real quantity and can be converted into BTUs, Joules, kilowatt-hours, calories, ergs, electron-volts or any other measure of energy as you please. All of these resolve down to the same fundamental quantities of mass times distance (divided by time) squared. Not all energy is the same, but all energy has the same fundamental units. Kinetic energy was not invented for literacy in india, the delight of gun writers. The different definitions of energy are based upon inter-related physical laws, none of which have been overturned since God created the universe, let alone in the last century.
Offering correction is as uncomfortable for the corrector as for the one being corrected. It disappoints me that many people actually despise or fear the truth (I am not pointing a finger here, this is a general observation more applicable to best, web forums and fireside talk). It is songs, a subtle thing, typically taking the form of bridesmaid speech, a resistance to let go of cherished misconceptions and an egoistic tendency that we all share to be knowledgeable. I have been proved wrong many times in my life and while the experience is not always a comfortable one, I am happier for being corrected. Not everyone is made happier by correction. An even more troublesome tendency that I have encountered is the dracula:, insistence that everything is subjective, that fact and opinion are equivalent. Bridesmaid. This viewpoint holds that objective reality has no inherent meaning, science is just a matter of expert opinion and such experts are plentiful.
If, as some have contended, all measured data such as penetration depth and patriarchy vs matriarchy wound diameter (even in game animals) provide us no absolute knowledge, if any degree of best speech, uncertainty removes all hope of understanding, then truly we have embraced superstition (or a weird form of backmasked, agnosticism) and are equally well served by consulting an best bridesmaid, astrologer about the performance of our weapons. III. A. iv. The Bullet Zipped Straight Through I see this kind of thing referenced persistently on web forums and in Essay Bixler's The Lost the customer product reviews at Midway. The prevalent belief is that some bullets, by dint of poor design or insufficient velocity (or perhaps even because they have too high an best speech, impact velocity - how does that work?), will pass through an animal without expanding or imparting any appreciable amount of their kinetic energy or causing any respectable wound.
It is an extenuation of the overpenetration worry that many hunters have, which gives rise to patriarchy, the suspicion that their bullets do not expand properly. It is, of course, rubbish. Almost all of these anecdotes describe situations in which the game is in bridesmaid speech fact bagged, because the curious detail of dracula: the impaler, a tiny exit wound is invariably a feature, indeed the key piece of best bridesmaid speech, evidence, offered to justify the accusation of sub-par performance. I have never once seen such a claim accompanied by any depiction of a post-mortem. Had it been done, I believe almost all of these situations would never be reported because it would be apparent that the bullet had performed very well, despite the small exit hole in the hide. Of course the bullets are never recovered in such scenarios, so there is no hard physical evidence to contradict the claim of Essay of Sudan, no expansion. Nosler Partitions of .308 caliber and speech smaller, Barnes X-Bullets and most other monolithic bullets as well as a number of softer cup and core designed bullets will make a small exit wound.
The smaller caliber Nosler Partitions and the soft cup and core bullets end up, not with a wide expanded mushroom, but instead with the jacket laid back tight against dracula: the impaler, the remaining shank of the bullet. The monolithic bullets can shed petals at higher impact velocities, but even if they don't the best bridesmaid speech, exit wounds may be small. The only instance of an expanding bullet that failed to expand that I have observed was an original Barnes X-Bullet that struck fully sideways making a perfect keyhole in in india the hide so, obviously, it wouldn't be expected to expand. The tip was mashed over as it tumbled. It was, by best speech, the way, extremely effective for all that, churning across the thorax and ending up buried in the opposite mr.chips novel, hind leg.
The warthog thrashed around for a few seconds, but barely moved. There is a prevalent tendency to believe that killing power is attributable to the cartridge chambering, rather than to bridesmaid speech, the bullet and impact velocity. Please don't think me facetious. Obviously, ultra magnums produce more velocity and can send the same bullet downrange with far greater kinetic energy than a cartridge of the backmasked songs, same caliber based on the Mauser or 1906 Springfield base case. More propellant in the case translates into more muzzle energy. Bridesmaid Speech. However, by the same reasoning, at some distance downrange no cartridge is novelists, any more potent than any other cartridge of like caliber when that bullet has achieved the speech, same velocity.
The .300 Shock Awe Magnum firing a 180 grain bullet at a muzzle velocity of patriarchy, 3200 fps is no more potent at 500 yards than a .30-40 Krag-Jorgensen at the muzzle, and an elk shot at that range wouldn't know the difference between that bullet and one fired at close range from the humble Krag. Yet I seriously doubt if the advocates of overbore magnums, and of shooting at game at bridesmaid distances in excess of 400 yards, routinely consider that their weapons are equivalent to cartridges that were in patriarchy vogue in 1920 when used at such extreme distances. What increased muzzle velocity has purchased hunters over the last 150 years or so is principally increased range, at the expense of reliability in some cases at the closer distances in which game will most often be encountered. I am not opposed to high velocity, it is best bridesmaid speech, generally a good thing, but there is a point of diminishing return. And there is nothing magical about any cartridge, no intrinsic property that imbues its projectiles with special lethality. Cartridges are simply containers of backmasked, propellant stoppered with bullets. Choose the ones that make sense in terms of the best speech, bullet weights that you use and the ranges that you hunt and don't be misled by hype about the supposed power of others because, as we will see in Part IV, higher velocity doesn't increase wound size as much as one might expect. III.
B. Miscalculations of Lethality. The following sections describe a series of quasi-scientific attempts to describe bullet load effectiveness. All of these are relatively simple relationships of basic quantities: bullet weight and/or diameter, sectional density and muzzle or impact velocity. Each is an attempt to go beyond the measure of mr.chips novel, merit of kinetic energy or momentum alone and produce a more accurate and realistic measure of performance. Each has its following and some are quite well regarded. The OGW formula was published in bridesmaid speech the April 1992 issue of songs, GUNS magazine and has since appeared in several references. It is speech, purportedly the result of in india, careful examination of the best bridesmaid, various contributions of victorian, kinetic energy, momentum, bullet sectional density, bullet diameter, bullet nose configuration, impact velocity and a number of best speech, other criteria (pg. 62) to terminal effect. The author, without elaborating on backmasked songs, his methodology, settled on the following formula: OGW (lbs) = Velocity (fps) 3 x Bullet Weight (grains) 2 x 1.5 x 10 -12.
This is, of course, nothing more than kinetic energy multiplied by momentum, then multiplied by some constant to arrive at the desired weight range (momentum is actually velocity times mass, not velocity times weight, but the two are related by a constant). Best Speech. There is absolutely nothing magical about the game weights derived by this calculation; they are entirely the The Lost Boys of Sudan, result of a subjective selection of the constant (i.e., 1.5 x 10 -12 divided by the acceleration due to gravity). Although the choice of this constant may be assumed to be based upon sage judgement, drawing on years of field experience, the result is best, merely a scaling factor. Literacy In India. The only terms in this calculation are velocity and bullet weight. The basic premise of the formula is worthy of closer examination.
The OGW formula attempts to combine in bridesmaid one measure the separate contributions of kinetic energy and momentum, or perhaps the two schools of thought: fast and mr.chips novel disruptive versus slow and deep. This is well intentioned; however, simply multiplying the two values is an unacceptable method of best bridesmaid, deriving a composite effect. For instance, a certain load may have a very high velocity and therefore a high kinetic energy, yet have a very light bullet weight and a correspondingly low momentum. How will it perform? The most useful description of its performance would be found by separating its component functions, cavitation and penetration, and analyzing these in literacy relation to the game in question. From experience, we know that very lightweight, small-bore ultra-velocity loads are poor performers against large game. Bridesmaid Speech. Yet an 85 grain .243 cal light game bullet traveling at 3500 fps would have an OGW rating of 389 lbs at the muzzle! Compare this to a 575 grain ball traveling at 850 fps with an OGW rating of 305 lbs. Backmasked. The former load is appropriate only for coyotes, jackrabbits and very lightly framed deer.
The latter load is for a 16 bore howdah pistol intended to stop charging tigers! Important caveats are in order. The author included an exhaustive list of best speech, cartridges and novelists loads, but the distinctions of OGW are only bridesmaid applicable between bullet weights and velocities. Literacy. The model itself makes no consideration whatsoever of the effect of sectional density, bullet diameter or nose configuration, although these were considered in best speech its development. Most glaringly, bullet construction is neglected. A 150 gr. Mr.chips Novel. bullet moving at 2800 fps is identical in this analysis, no matter whether it be a .264 caliber RWS H-Mantel or .358 caliber Remington Core-Lokt. However, these two loads would have vastly differing performance on game. The model assumes you have selected a reasonable bullet weight and construction for the application in mind (in fairness to the author, Matunas makes this point clear, but it does beg the question of bridesmaid, just what this model does tell you if you must already know the answer before you begin). What the OGW Table really attempts to Essay The Lost of Sudan, be describe is the approximate heaviest weight of animal that could be reliably killed from bridesmaid, any angle using modern high-powered cartridges (not 19th century big-bore blackpowder weapons or even early 20th century weapons), assuming the bullet selected was reasonable. Strictly speaking, a true optimum game weight would be that size of beast which this load killed most effectively, and any game animal either heavier or lighter would be less effectively dispatched, so the use of the victorian, term optimum is misplaced.
Unfortunately, by making velocity a third order term it wildly exaggerates the bridesmaid speech, effect of this component in terminal behavior, which (as will be shown in Part IV) has surprisingly little meaningful effect for deforming bullets. Victorian. Moreover, the best speech, dramatic degradation in effectiveness with increasing range is also far from accurate. A typical high velocity bullet is shown to The Lost of Sudan, lose half its effectiveness between the muzzle and 250 yards. In practice, no meaningful loss of performance is experienced for most high velocity rifle cartridges and best bridesmaid indeed some performance improvement may be observed with many bullets of conventional construction at moderated velocities! Worse, it suggests that if one uses light for caliber bullets, then the most effective employment of these projectiles is at close range and very high velocity - in direct opposition to all conventional wisdom and test data. Under these conditions very lightly constructed bullets are most likely to disintegrate.
Comparisons between different calibers and bullet weights in this analysis, as suggested by the author, are simply not valid for reasons outlined previously. I almost hate to comment on this one because it happens to be a favorite of one of my favorite gun writers, a man of outstanding skill and a reputable hunter whose guidance in such matters should not be taken lightly (and I don't refer to Taylor!). Taylor himself was also a man of unimpeachable experience and his views on rifles and calibers, especially for dangerous game, is taken as gospel on Essay, the subject. However, this formula has got to go. I'm sympathetic to speech, the motivations which brought about its creation.
The smallbore cranks were a cult phenomenon at the time, preaching vehemently about high velocity and kinetic energy. A number of this following ventured to backmasked songs, Africa, and like their predecessors in the heyday of blackpowder express cartridges, experienced miserable failures in the field, sometimes with fatal consequences to the shooter or guides. Taylor was attempting to counter this scientific kind of argument with a kind of scientific methodology. Applying his many years of experience to the problem (and it must be confessed, his biases as well), he developed a formula which favored the kind of best bridesmaid speech, bullets and on Mark Bixler's The Lost of Sudan cartridges he knew to work reliably: TKO = Bullet Weight (lbs) x Impact Velocity (fps) x Bullet Diameter (in) Regrettably, this formula is as misleading as any kinetic energy figures or OGW or any other I've seen. For example, a hand-thrown baseball would have roughly twice the TKO of the standard nitro express load. I doubt if anyone would argue that bouncing a baseball off the noggin of an elephant would produce any positive result.
Taylor himself acknowledged that there wasn't any appreciable difference in the killing performance of the best bridesmaid, various .400s, .416s, .450s, .465s, .470s, .475s, and Essay on Mark Bixler's The Lost of Sudan .500s on dangerous game when loaded with reliable bullets of sound construction. But his TKO formula (as generally interpreted) exaggerates any difference that might exist because it makes the bore diameter equally as important as the velocity; thus a .488 caliber .475 Jeffery No. 2 is seen to be 7% more potent than a .458 caliber .450 NE even though they both have the bridesmaid speech, same ballistics. The comparison becomes even more exaggerated between a .450/.400 NE and a .500 NE in which the larger bore is calculated to be 55 % more potent, even though Taylor regards them as being very similar in killing performance. In fairness to the author, the in india, TKO value is generally misinterpreted (notice that the table he provides only includes loads for solid bullets). Taylor himself said of it: I do not pretend that they [TKOs] represent killing power; but they do give an excellent basis from which any two rifles may be compared from the best bridesmaid speech, point of view of the actual knock-down blow, or punch, inflicted by the bullet on massive, heavy-boned animals such as elephant, rhino and buffalo. ( African Rifles and Cartridges , pg. Essay The Lost Of Sudan. xii) There seems to be a lot of misunderstanding about this word shock; men seem to be under the impression that it implies killing power.
But that is erroneous. ( African Rifles and Cartridges , pg. Best Speech. 58) Elaborating, the author indicates that this stunning effect truly applies for the most part to near misses of the brain on elephant, enabling a more leisurely dispatch with a follow-up shot (possibly of Essay on Mark Bixler's The Lost Boys of Sudan, lesser caliber) or, especially, permitting the shooting of other nearby elephants, while the first is down. Such tactics are no longer permissible and were never ethical in bridesmaid speech my view (Taylor was a self-acknowledged poacher). Indeed, whether his TKO is true even in dracula: the impaler this sense is a highly contentious matter, disputed by some very experienced African hunters (I will not pretend to be highly experienced in this regard, but I have seen a Cape buffalo shot between the eyes, within millimeters of bridesmaid, its brain, with a .500 NE which did not produce any effect whatsoever). More recently, Craig Boddington has voiced a similar doubt on the basis of his observations and those of other contemporary hunters and game control officers ( Like a Freight Train , Rifle Shooter , November - December 2009, pgs.
38 - 42). But the point here is that Taylor never offered this formula as an indicator of novelists, killing or even shocking performance for hits on the body. That is an American gun pundit extrapolation of thought. Taylor includes TKO values for everything down to the .256 Mannlicher, but not with a view to offering the relative merits of one small-bore or medium-bore against another for general hunting use - its to show how puny these are relative to the big-bores for stopping an elephant. Still, Taylor also made the best, point that even a stopping rifle was ineffective with poor shooting: Both barrels from a .600 in the belly will have little more apparent effect on [an elephant] than a single shot from a .275 in mr.chips novel the same place. ( African Rifles and Cartridges , pg. Best. 59)
American hunters and gun writers use terms like stopping power, shock and killing power to the impaler, describe how quickly a deer (elk, antelope, etc.) falls when hit. Practically no one hunts elephant anymore and I can't remember the last time I saw an article on that subject. Promotion of the TKO is indicative of the careless way in which any quasi-scientific method is seized upon, even though the originator of it may reject that purpose to which it is bridesmaid, put (though, again, I am not endorsing or placing validity on Taylor's TKO calculation, even for the purpose he intended). Incidentally, if there is a knockout effect it will almost certainly be a function of bullet shape, presented area and velocity. Bullet mass will not matter greatly, but a separate calculation would be necessary to assess whether sufficient penetration was provided. John Wooters is another old salt who ought to the impaler, be listened to best bridesmaid speech, reverently.
I love Wooters, even if he is in india, a bit of a curmudgeon (when one has graduated to speech, the plateau of veneration upon which he resides, one can be forgiven for curmudgeonhood). No doubt frustrated with the ceaseless litany of kinetic energy figures, he concocted a formula for patriarchy, what he felt was a better measure of a bullet's effectiveness on game. Unlike Taylor's Knockout rating, the Lethality Index (or L-Factor) is best bridesmaid speech, intended to be a real measure of killing effect on victorian novelists, thin-skinned game by expanding rifle bullets (Finn Aagaard, The Truth About Stopping Power , Big-Bore Rifles , pp. 8 - 11). The author's formula is described below:
LI = Kinetic Energy (ft-lbs) x Sectional Density x Bullet Diameter (in) To be fair to Wooters, let me assert that indeed, large diameter bullets do make more cavernous and best speech effective wounds than smaller diameters, kinetic energy certainly is a significant component in the measure of the wounding, and bullets with a high sectional density tend to penetrate deeper and expand with a higher residual weight (all things being equal). Mr.chips Novel. The trouble is: all things aren't on best speech, equal footing and quickie formulas that don't even take bullet performance into literacy, account cannot be considered meaningful measures of best, terminal effect. To be meaningful and scientifically sound (ie, correct and true), a formula or theory must be founded on carefully collected test data, not gut feelings, prevalent perceptions and anecdotal evidence (which is little better than hearsay). Victorian. Again, to be fair, this formula is an assessment of the potential of a specific cartridge-load combination and its components are assessed at the muzzle, but (as I will demonstrate in Part IV) the best bridesmaid, downrange performance of otherwise identical loads can be very different and sectional density, in particular, is an unreliable indicator of bullet performance. Not to pick on the Lethality Index alone, but I am suspicious of any lethality, killing or stopping formula which just goes up and up without end. What exactly does this mean? Something can only be so dead. Does a value twice as high as another mean that it kills twice as quickly, twice the game weight, two animals standing side by side, or with twice the probability? Just what is in india, conveyed by best bridesmaid speech, these figures?
Even their creators cannot tell you. After all the computations and three or four significant digits of precision, it all comes down to literacy, a touchy-feely sort of thing. I fear that this whole fascination for performance indices ultimately arises from the best speech, American passion for statistics and mr.chips novel our competitive spirit. It is best bridesmaid, sports stats on a different plane. My rifle load is mr.chips novel, better than your rifle load and I can prove it! As a young person, I was as guilty as anyone of making all sorts of best, comparative calculations of kinetic energy and momentum for various cartridge-load combinations. But this is a pretty pointless exercise, too far removed from the real mechanics of wounding to be of any practical value.
III. B. Songs. iv. Best Speech. Hornady Index of Terminal Standards (HITS) The most recent attempt to quantify terminal performance in in india simple terms has been put forward by Hornady in bridesmaid the form of an online calculator . Its stated purpose is to assist hunters in selecting a bullet and cartridge combination suitable for any hunting situation. After a little experimentation I derived the Bixler's The Lost, terms of the calculation, which is given below: HITS = Bullet Weight 2 / Bullet Diameter 2 / 7000 x Impact Velocity / 100. Alternatively, recognizing that some of the bridesmaid, terms constitute the sectional density: HITS = Bullet Weight x Sectional Density x Impact Velocity / 100. Having calculated this value, one then compares the score to four categories: 500 or Below -- Small game weighing less than 50 lbs 501 to 900 -- Medium game with a body weight of 50 to 300 lbs (e.g., deer, black bear and caribou) 901 to 1500 -- Large and heavy, but non-dangerous game weighing from patriarchy, 300 to 2000 lbs (e.g., elk, moose, African plains game, bison, etc) 1501 or Above -- Dangerous game of any weight (including, for example, big cats)
This system bears a strong resemblance to bridesmaid, the Optimum Game Weight calculation, but differs in important respects. While, unavoidably, any calculation would lead to splitting hairs and patriarchy vs matriarchy comparisons between cartridges, the HITS system only indicates the general class of game animal suitable for that load. Hornady makes no advertisement that the values correspond to bridesmaid speech, the relative capabilities of the loads in anything more precise than the four general categories. Clearly, higher is deemed to be better, but it does not follow that mathematical proportions between the values can be assumed to indicate how much better. The Lost. In other words, a HITS of best speech, 1500 does not indicate that the load is twice as powerful as a load with a HITS score of 750. That's a more reasonable posture than was put forward by the OGW, which claimed to tell you the actual weight, to the pound, of the optimum game size.
Additionally, unlike some other calculations, the HITS doesn't pretend to novelists, tell you how effective a bullet / catridge combination will be; its not a measure of lethality. While I don't endorse any of these quick calculations as rendering some deeper insight into the actual mechanics of terminal ballistics, the HITS methodology does tend to push the user toward solutions which are known to work better: higher sectional density and heavier bullet weight for best speech, heavier game. It doesn't include the victorian, unfortunate bias of velocity that the best bridesmaid, OGW creates, nor the bullet diameter bias of the TKO. For the most part, its a conservative result. Perusing the backmasked songs, tabulated HITS for bridesmaid speech, all the dracula:, Hornady ammunition, at first nothing leaps out bridesmaid speech, as an obvious case of mathematical mischief. None of the .223 Remington loads is judged to be suitable for mr.chips novel, medium game, not even the 75 grain loads. Best. None of the 6 mm or .257 caliber loads is judged to songs, be acceptable for best, elk and other large game. If anything the scores result in an overly conservative categorization.
Goodness knows how many elk have fallen to the .32 Winchester Special and on Mark Bixler's of Sudan .30-30 Winchester, despite their sub-900 HITS scores. Speech. But a little conservatism these days is not necessarily a bad thing. The problem begins with the medium bores, in which all three parameters tend to be high. The .338 Winchester Magnum with a 225 grain bullet is judged suitable for dangerous game, which might be true depending on the game in mind (think leopards, lions or bears) and the bullet chosen. However, the literacy in india, Hornady Super Shock Tip shown in the table, a rapidly expanding and lightly constructed, boat-tailed bullet, would not be a good choice for any of these game animals. It might even be a fatal choice. Still more egregious is the suggestion that the 250 grain boat-tail hollowpoint load of the .338 Lapua might be a dangerous game load.
Obviously, a match bullet has no place whatsoever in speech any dangerous game hunting situation. On the other hand, none of the big-bore lever gun loads of the .405 Winchester, .444 Marlin, .45-70 Government or .450 Marlin are judged minimally acceptable for dangerous game, including the big cats or bears, and these would all be first rate for that role even if we leave aside the debate over their utility against dracula: the impaler, heavy, thick-skinned dangerous game. Once beyond medium bores that possess enough velocity to score as dangerous game loads and the lever gun loads lacking enough to qualify, things return to expectation, which is to say that the truly big bores are all judged to be suitable choices for dangerous game. Best Bridesmaid. No surprises there. On the whole, unless one has literally no notion of what makes a suitable load for a given hunting application (and, granted, their numbers are legion) I don't really see the utility of this. But then again, maybe I am missing the forest for the trees. Maybe Hornady is right and basic shooter education trumps technical validity from their vantage point. The worst outcome of this sort of calculation to my mind is the in india, impression fostered that the performance of a load is largely or even totally independent of the bullet chosen.
The HITS treats every bullet of equivalent weight and sectional density (i.e., caliber) the same. In reality, the bullet chosen has a far more significant effect on the terminal performance than the best speech, velocity. Across a wide velocity spread the wound pattern will be similar for a given bullet of good design, but the differences between a monolithic solid, a bonded core hunting bullet and a varmint or match bullet of equal weight and caliber would be dramatic. Hornady does speak to the applicability of the bullet to the purpose in general terms, but its clear that their desire to use this new tool and apply it without further elaboration to their current line of vs matriarchy, ammunition outweighs any concern for best bridesmaid, misuse of their products. A simple statement in a footnote indicating which loads do not qualify as dangerous game loads (in fact why are match loads even shown here at literacy all?) would suffice, without impugning the validity of what the HITS provides, at least in the mind of the best bridesmaid speech, target consumer. III.
B. v. Bekker Knock-Out Value (KOV) Well, here is what appears at literacy first blush to be a step forward. Invented by bridesmaid, South African pundit Chris Bekker, whose column The View from the mr.chips novel, Veld appears in bridesmaid the UK-based quarterly webzines Sporting Rifles and vs matriarchy Deerstalker , the Knock-Out Value (KOV) formula is based on best bridesmaid, a simplified (and again, slightly erroneous) terminal momentum calculation: KOV = Terminal Momentum (lb-ft/s) x Sectional Density x Mushroom Factor Terminal Momentum = Impact Velocity (ft/s) x Retained Bullet Weight (lbs) Sectional Density = Original Bullet Weight (lbs) / Bullet Diameter (in) 2.
The author has presented more than one version of this formula in his writings at various times (for instance, dropping the Mushroom Factor and using muzzle values for bullet weight and velocity), but the above is said to be the proper form. This formula inverts the bias of kinetic energy, effectively giving us mass squared times velocity, and uses a mix of pre-impact and literacy in india post-impact values. It looks pretty good for all that. After all, we have retained weight, impact velocity, and some accounting for expanded diameter. So what is wrong? Well, for one thing, as with the other shortcut calculations, we are expected to simply accept this formula as the definition of killing power at face value. Best Bridesmaid Speech. Why should it be terminal momentum multiplied by sectional density? Why not kinetic energy multiplied or divided by expanded frontal area, for instance? From where did this insight arise? Where is the novelists, physical evidence justifying a Mushroom Factor assessed to three or four significant digits for a plethora of bullet configurations? To paraphrase Jerry MacGuire: Show me the data!
The only evidence that the author offers to bridesmaid, support its validity is in the form of comparisons to backmasked songs, other popular indices and factors or to kinetic energy alone. No documentation or analysis is best, provided to show how these relationships in the KOV were derived. If there were any objective analytical basis for mr.chips novel, this formula then the author would have presented that data instead of simply making unsubstantiated claims about the correspondance between the KOV and best actual field experience. Patriarchy. When the support of real world field experience is drawn upon for evidence, it is entirely subjective, simply the conventional wisdom, thusly: Everybody knows that the 9.3 x 62 mm Mauser would be far superior on best, Cape buffalo than the .300 Remington UltraMag, and the KOV shows it to be 28 % better. Mr.chips Novel. Whether or not such assumptions are true is debatable; it really depends on the behavior of the bullet, and just how exactly does one judge 28% better performance in the field? Deeper? Larger hole? Fewer steps until it collapses? Was it actually 32 % better or only best speech 24 % better? See the problem?
In any event, the KOV does not take into backmasked, consideration the best bridesmaid speech, animal to be shot. Why then a Cape buffalo for the comparison? Why not a much smaller animal such as a springbok? I seriously doubt if the 9.3 x 62 mm Mauser can be shown to be 28 % better on a springbok. What then can such a measure really tell us? This sort of reasoning does not qualify as scientific argument or evidence. None of this mathematical dexterity demonstrates anything but that one can multiply several numbers together and end up with a result that subjectively and qualitatively satisfies one's preconceived notions about how things work - most of which are based on Essay, popular notions of best bridesmaid, terminal ballistics (better known as conventional wisdom and frequently incorrect). By a careful (or haphazard) selection of terms and their arrangement, one can make almost any cartridge-load combination seem far superior to others. At best this sort of approach results in a gross generalization that tells us what we already knew: namely that high retained bullet weight is good, as is expanded diameter, that bullets with high sectional density often perform better than those with less, likewise velocity is good, etc.
However, some of the impaler, these also have a downside. Scientific, analytic methods and measures must be as objective and quantitative as possible. Consequently, theories of terminal effect must be evaluated in quantitative terms, meaning that dimensions of wounds must be evaluated. None of best speech, these formulaic approaches can be defended with a study of victorian, field results, nor have their creators (including Taylor) ever attempted such an analysis. Best Speech. Field experience without measurement and records is next door to useless. It is no better than armchair opinion or hearsay. Victorian. Science is not founded on faith in the analytical powers of an bridesmaid, individual, it is founded on fact which can be examined and tested by any individual. In his defense (I suppose) Bekker asserts that he has never argued that his method was based on scientific principles.
In constrast with the OGW which never even considered the caliber or the TKO which looked only at nominal caliber, the KOV at the impaler least considers the bridesmaid, expanded diameter; however, the expanded diameter and impact velocity do not occur together in time. The KOV has associated the novelists, terminal rest state of the bullet with its velocity an instant before impact. This is a bit like suggesting that a person can walk away from bridesmaid speech, a head-on collision with a 10-ton cement truck at 100 mph in exactly the patriarchy vs matriarchy, same state that one steps into the vehicle as it is bridesmaid, sitting in literacy in india the driveway at home. These two quantities are associated with completely different states. Most the bullet's kinetic energy is expended in getting it into that shape. A Knock Out Value created by multiplying them together just doesn't mean anything in best bridesmaid real terms.
The KOV calculation assumes that the final shape of the bullet is realized instantly and without loss of velocity. In actuality, the velocity changes instantly with each millimeter of penetration as the bullet gradually expands to its maximum expanded diameter, then assumes its smaller fully deformed diameter that it will hold when the hydrodynamic pressure falls below the effective flow stress of the bullet (at a velocity of roughly 1900 to 2100 fps for most rifle bullets). Though transpiring in a matter of time on the order of a fraction of dracula:, a millisecond, this is not an instantaneous process and the interval between impact and the termination of hydrodynamic deformation in the bullet dominates the mechanics of the penetration event. The following figure illustrates the point. Bridesmaid Speech. It shows a series of curves describing the fraction of the Essay Bixler's The Lost, kinetic energy at impact which is expended during the hydrodynamic deformation phase (of the bullet) for various retained bullet weights, assuming a hydrodynamic termination velocity of 1900 fps. Bridesmaid Speech. It will be quickly observed that, for 3000 fps impacts, between 60% and novelists 80% of the kinetic energy at impact is expended by the time the bullet has assumed its final form. Best Bridesmaid Speech. Even at Essay impact velocities only slightly above the hydrodynamic termination velocity, the energy of the bullet deformation and resultant cavitation amounts to between 10% and 55% of the total kinetic energy. If we care about retained weight and expanded diameter, we ought to care about the interaction which resulted in those dimensions.
However, even if one knew the termination velocity for bridesmaid, deformation in the impaler the bullet (which could be anything from 1400 to 2300 fps), any statement about the character of the wound (or the impact velocity) based solely on the final expanded diameter and retained weight would amount to mere speculation. Best Bridesmaid. It is the process by which the bullet assumes that final form that dictates the dimensions of the wound. I have tested many bullet designs and backmasked songs there is no obvious correspondance between the appearance of the recovered bullet and the hole it produced during its penetration. Two bullets having the same recovered appearance may create very different wounds based on their impact velocity and bridesmaid speech design characteristics. A bullet with smaller frontal surface area may make a significantly larger diameter wound than one which has expanded to a perfect classic mushroom. You may not believe that - I wouldn't have believed it a few years ago - but I have proved it with testing (as will be seen in Part IV). In fact, if I may generalize, I have observed that the bullets recovered with the smallest expanded diameters frequently produce the largest cavities (not that they are the Essay on Mark of Sudan, best overall performers). This is why, in best bridesmaid my mind at least, both testing and careful observation and measurement of field performance are infinitely more meaningful than homemade formulas based on no physical evidence or pontifications safely removed from the contrary facts. Although he has offered no physical evidence for mr.chips novel, his theories, Bekker may well have a wealth of hunting and shooting experience. That can be incontravertably said for Pondoro Taylor and speech John Wooters and others who have attempted to create a mathematical expression consistent with their experience. I do not wish to novelists, be perceived as casting doubt on the substantive creditable field experience of best speech, anyone.
Still, these methods do not work. In the final analysis, the KOV is little better (nor any worse) than the TKO, OGW or any of a score of other formulas trying to get at the answer. They all fall short of telling us more than we already knew. I don't wish to be unduly criticizing the KOV or Bekker. These formulas are merely the manifestations of the biases we have all held as hunters. Mr.chips Novel. The KOV looks like it has a little more thought behind it than many such calculations, but precisely for that reason (and as a springboard to elucidate what is best speech, really happening during bullet deformation) I have given its features a more studied treatment. What most or all of mr.chips novel, these shortcut attempts suffer from at the very outset is old-fashioned human prejudice - the pre-conceived notion on the part of the creator concerning what the best, answer ought to backmasked songs, be. We are all guilty of bridesmaid speech, this. Not even the best of us is free from vs matriarchy, prejudice (which is why objective methods must be adhered to), but if we seek the truth, we must be prepared to be divested of our cherished beliefs, not always see them upheld. Insistence that the facts must be somehow wrong because my formula holds otherwise, and I have a vast body of hearsay and conjecture supporting me! in the face of plain physical evidence is bridesmaid speech, nothing more than denial, an inability to face reality.
Theory must bend to songs, empirical evidence. A better understanding will follow. The other great fault of these attempts is rooted in a (perhaps innocent and unwitting) misuse of scientific principles, in the arbitrary combination of physical quantities until a satisfying result is obtained. Bridesmaid. Mechanics works only in certain prescribed ways, and what we wish to understand is the mechanics that result in patriarchy a wound of discrete specific dimensions. Pseudoscience doesn't advance our understanding and those of us who know better need to improve the best speech, understanding of those who genuinely seek to know, yet stumble here and there with the details.
At the far extreme of this spectrum is a distrustful perspective of science. Tragically, America seems to literacy in india, place about as much confidence in science as in superstition. That makes a damning statement about the quality of our education efforts, because it wasn't that way 150 years ago. I frequently encounter the bridesmaid, attitude on cyber forums that physics and biology cannot really answer our questions about terminal performance, that it all comes down to some kind of personal thing, like faith, or that it is far too complex to ever understand or quantify. Mr.chips Novel. That is nonsense. Best Bridesmaid Speech. The truth isn't up for grabs, no matter how poor our grasp of it may be. However, even the introduction of more disciplined scientific approaches can have its pitfalls, as the next section will demonstrate. III. C. Bad Science: Misrepresentations of Physics. Anyone who has persevered this far is either with me or else hopelessly confused but doggedly staying in there. Literacy. For the hopelessly confused I now offer some hope.
Probably I should have included this discussion in the Mechanics of Terminal Ballistics , but I wanted that discussion to be general and easily accessible. Best Speech. Of necessity, we must now get down to the details. III. C. Mr.chips Novel. i. Best Bridesmaid Speech. Relationships of Force, Momentum and Energy. I am appalled by the articles that I see published which evince an ignorance of basic science. Literacy. Just for my own sanity and peace of best bridesmaid, mind, lets review a few fundamentals. Mass is an intrinsic quantity of matter (as near as we can tell, but lets not get into string theory!) which describes the inertia of an backmasked songs, object.
Inertia is the property of an object that resists changes in its motion. Mass and best bridesmaid weight are not the Bixler's The Lost of Sudan, same thing, but we normally associate the two. Weight is best bridesmaid, actually a force exerted on a mass in a gravitational field. We live with gravity so we think of mr.chips novel, mass and weight as being the same thing. It is vital in mechanics to recognize that they are distinct.
This distinction was not perceived at first by best bridesmaid speech, scientists (understandably) and so the original English system of units is based on the fundamental quantities of backmasked, force (pounds), length (feet) and speech time (seconds), rather than more properly on mass (kilograms), length (meters) and time (seconds), as was done in the late 18th century when the vs matriarchy, metric system was developed (yes, its over 200 years old!). Force is actually a derived quantity, not a fundamental quantity, but that's water under the bridge, so lets not brood about it. Speech. [This conundrum has led to the introduction of pounds-force, lbf, and pounds-mass, lbm, where 1 lbf = 32.174 lbm-ft/s 2 , but this convention has not removed the confusion, only resulted in NASA Mars probes falling from orbit! Vive le Systeme Internationale!] Velocity is the dracula:, rate of change in the position of an object with respect to time. Here too, we normally use the words speed and bridesmaid speech velocity interchangeably, but this is incorrect. Speed is the magnitude of the velocity, but velocity is a vector quantity which means that it carries with it an implicit direction of movement.
I throw the term around rather loosely when speaking of patriarchy, terminal ballistics, but its important to recognize that there is best bridesmaid speech, more to velocity than mere speed. Essay Bixler's The Lost Of Sudan. Because next we get to acceleration. Acceleration is the time rate of change of best, velocity. Note that this is any change in mr.chips novel the velocity, either in magnitude or direction. A classic example is a mass suspended on a string which is being whirled with constant speed . It is being subjected to a constant acceleration because its velocity direction is constantly changing as it turns around its center of rotation. [Deceleration is slang for a negative acceleration and you won't find me using that term (I hope!)]. Obviously then, acceleration is also a vector quantity. It can be in the direction of motion or against it or in any other direction. Momentum is the physical quantity of a mass moving with a given velocity, or simply mass multiplied by velocity.
The units in the English system are lb-s, not lb-ft/s as some might suppose (remember, pounds are a unit of force, not mass). Force is the physical quantity describing a mass experiencing a change in velocity, or mass multiplied by acceleration. Clearly then, the time rate of change in momentum is the same as force. Forces act on masses and induce changes in best bridesmaid speech motion and, hence, the momentum. More on that in Essay on Mark Bixler's The Lost of Sudan a moment. Sir Isaac Newton is the most important person in the history of mechanics, possibly in the history of all science and mathematics. He not only established the rules of mechanics in best bridesmaid terms of its fundamental physical quantities, he also invented the calculus, which is Essay The Lost, essential for solving the best bridesmaid, problems of mechanics.
It is useful to understand the backmasked songs, difference between a derivative and an integral for the following discussion. A differential quantity is an infinitessimally small slice of a whole. A derivative is a rate of change between two differential quantities. Best Bridesmaid. It is usually expressed as a symbolic (indefinite) fractional differential quantity, such as dx / dy. Literacy In India. Velocity can be expressed as: v = ds / dt, that is, the differential quantity of distance (s) with respect to (divided by) the differential quantity of time (t). Acceleration can be similarly expressed as: a = dv / dt. Since acceleration is the time derivative of velocity and velocity is the time derivative of best bridesmaid, distance, then it is mr.chips novel, clear that acceleration is the second time derivative of distance, a = d 2 s / dt 2 . Sometimes we speak of the best bridesmaid speech, differential quantities of mass, distance, velocity and acceleration as dm, ds, dv, and da, but it is important to note the distinction between a differential quantity and victorian novelists a derivative. Not all derivatives are taken with respect to time, for instance. An integral, on best bridesmaid speech, the other hand, is the on Mark Bixler's of Sudan, sum of the differential quantities integrated over some boundary. Best. For example, the total distance (s) covered by a bullet can be described using calculus by performing the the impaler, time integration of the velocity, taking each instantaneous velocity (ds / dt) and multiplying by each differential time quantity dt and summing at each step.
If this calculation is best bridesmaid, performed numerically with enough resolution the answer will be very good. It can be performed analytically for an exact answer if the expression describing ds / dt is known and has an analytical solution (not always the case). Energy is a term that gets abused more than any other scientific term. Crackpots love energy. Its does not mean power, force, impulse, momentum force, or lifeforce for that matter. Energy is a physical quantity describing the activity state of matter. It occurs (or manifests itself) in Essay of Sudan many forms. Best Bridesmaid. For our purposes, the most significant of these are kinetic energy, work and the impaler heat. Best Speech. There is also chemical, nuclear, and electromagnetic radiant energy (potential energy is an imaginary concept useful for describing closed systems). Kinetic energy is that attributed to a mass with a given velocity, or KE = (m / 2) v 2 . Work is the energy expended by a force acting over a distance, W = Integral (F ds). Heat is a form of internal energy which is basically kinetic energy on songs, the scale of atoms.
Heat can be expressed as the mass multiplied by the specific heat of a material and best bridesmaid speech its absolute temperature, U = mCT. On Mark Bixler's The Lost Of Sudan. Even though these different energies are calculated using different methods and often expressed in different units (ft-lbs, Joules, BTUs, calories, etc.), they all resolve back to bridesmaid speech, the same fundamental units of mass x length 2 / time 2 and are totally interchangeable. In other words, energy is not simply some arbitrary term tossed about by scientists that means one thing in one context and something else entirely in another context. Power, in a scientific sense, is the time rate of energy change, transfer or usage, expressed as the derivative de / dt. If any term gets abused more than energy it would have to be power. Here again, ft-lbs/s, horsepower and Watts can all be interchanged with a simple conversion constant. Freshman level physics textbooks are notoriously bad sources for an understanding of ballistics.
I can sympathize with the confusion that many have in patriarchy vs matriarchy this regard. One would like to believe that the bridesmaid, college level science class is free from error. Sadly, the late American penchant for making things accessible to patriarchy, the student has led to some regrettable abuses of the truth. Typical example problems describing ballistic events are invariably sprinkled with phrases like, . neglecting air resistance. , . assuming perfectly elastic (or rigid) bodies. Bridesmaid. , and . a collison between perfectly plastic bodies. . Such assumptions are utterly unrealistic and throw away the entire problem in literacy real world exterior and terminal ballistics. One could more sensibly neglect gravity than air resistance! The acceleration due to gravity is only 32.174 ft/s 2 , but the speech, (negative) acceleration due to air resistance is on the order of 1700 ft/s 2 or more for high velocity rifle bullets. Backmasked. The equations of motion governing ballistic flight of projectiles are a set of highly complex, coupled second order differential equations that have no analytical solution, so the textbook manufacturers don't want to discuss it. Its easier to give the student a false impression of reality with a problem that is best bridesmaid, simply solved. Worse things occur when textbooks attempt to describe terminal ballistics. All real bodies are imperfect, plastic (inelastic) and non-rigid.
Elastic deformation is recoverable, meaning the object is patriarchy vs matriarchy, not permanently deformed. Plastic deformation is permanent. All ballistic events of interest involve large plastic deformations. Elastic and best bridesmaid speech plastic equate to the terminal ballistic terms of temporary cavity and permanent cavity. Rigidity is the completely imaginary property of not deforming, either elastically or plastically, when loaded. There is novelists, no such thing as a rigid body, but the bridesmaid speech, assumption is often used in textbooks for simplicity when (typically static) loads are small in relation to the strength of an object.
It ought to be pretty clear that rigidity is not an literacy in india, assumption that makes much sense in terminal ballistics (unless we are talking about solids, and well constructed ones at that). Furthermore, any degree of penetration implies plastic deformation, which is best speech, not described by the most commonly offered relations of elastic mechanical behavior (such as Hooke's Law), and which involves a significant expenditure of strain energy. Backmasked Songs. Thus, the invention of the concept of perfect plasticity, in which no energy is best bridesmaid speech, expended. This abomination violates the Second and Third Laws of Thermodynamics and should never even be discussed. Newton's Second Law of Motion, also known as the mr.chips novel, principle of Conservation of Momentum, states: The time integral of the change in momentum (or, the impulse) of a system is equal to the time integral of the resultant of all applied forces acting on the system, or: I = Integral (F dt). Bridesmaid Speech. This has been restated in the more familar form that the resultant of all the forces acting on a system is on Mark The Lost Boys, equal to the integral of the mass multiplied by the acceleration, or Integral (F) = Integral (ma). This is the most important expression in all mechanics. Best Speech. Everything builds on this, but it is Essay The Lost of Sudan, vital not to be confused about best bridesmaid speech, what it means. This is not an algebraic expression, it is an integral expression in vector form. Different rules apply.
Newton's Second Law is The Lost Boys, often violated in textbook sample problems. A classic textbook problem allegedly illustrating the conservation of momentum typically states: A bullet has a mass of 10 g and a velocity of best bridesmaid, 800 m/s. The bullet strikes a block at rest with a mass of 4 kg, and is fully embedded in Essay of Sudan the block. Bridesmaid. Assuming that the bodies are perfectly plastic and mr.chips novel that the best bridesmaid, block rests on patriarchy vs matriarchy, a frictionless surface, find the final velocity of the block. [Solution: This is rubbish and does not demonstrate Newton's Second Law. The effects of time and best bridesmaid force are completely lost! The attempt to make the principle seem real to the student results in gross unreality. Such examples should be confined to billiard balls moving at very low velocity.
But even here we have a problem. Dracula: The Impaler. The classic freshman physics class demonstration of the principle of bridesmaid speech, conservation of momentum is the rack of billiard balls suspended by patriarchy, wires. The ball on one end is raised and released to strike its neighbor and best bridesmaid speech instantly the far end ball is kicked away! Very cool! Ever wonder though why it is that the balls do not go on clacking forever? They return to rest in just a few seconds! What they didn't tell you in school is mr.chips novel, that there is more to mechanics than conservation of momentum. In fact, the gross way that conservation of momentum is typically described, as the resultant of all the gross mass-velocity interactions, is simply untrue. But Newton didn't express his second law in these terms. Bridesmaid. It is patriarchy, clear in the case of the bridesmaid, clacking billiard balls that something steals a piece of momentum with each cycle until the whole system returns to rest. [In fact, there exists a finite number of balls such that if one is clacked into its neighbor on one end there will be no movement by the ball on dracula:, the other end due to the accumulation of small robberies of energy along the way.] Some have argued that this is entirely due to the frame or the best bridesmaid speech, wires or contact with the Earth, but this is simply not true.
The result would be no different if the in india, same experiment were repeated in deep space, far from any gravitational field and not contacting any other body, with a series of hard spheres interconnected by springs. Bridesmaid Speech. Once released, it would be only Bixler's a matter of best bridesmaid speech, seconds before the dracula:, movement ceased. This is a closed system, from which the energy is not escaping as radiant heat fast enough to explain why it stops moving (and heat is best bridesmaid, not a term in Newton's equation anyway - however, this serves to victorian novelists, illustrate why energy methods are the only methods of bridesmaid speech, analysis that really prove dependable in some situations). Ah! However, some will say, this is in india, a closed system and its net momentum is zero. Indeed, but that misses the best speech, point. Backmasked Songs. The momentum of the speech, cycling masses within the system will still degrade to zero and the laws of motion apply to them as surely as to anything else. Moreover, if you built a device that permitted the patriarchy vs matriarchy, momentum of these interconnected masses to be transmitted in all directions (due to their interconnections - as is true in atomic matter) then the linear momentum of an impact would not be preserved for best, an inelastic event, even in space far from any gravitational influence. Understand what I am saying.
I am not contending that Newton's Second Law is invalid; quite the Bixler's of Sudan, contrary. What I am saying is that real mechanics is not simplistic. Newton's Law holds that the time integral of the momentum is the integral of the resultant of the forces acting on and within a system. I am trying to emphasize that those forces depend on the system; the motion of the balls depends on the microstructural makeup of the balls. If the forces vary with physical properties then the mechanics of motion cannot be assumed to bridesmaid, be invariant. That thieving something is the literacy, resistive forces in the atomic structure of matter. Its the same something that was expressed in the Third Law of best speech, Thermodynamics long after Newton. All movement encounters resistive forces, such as friction. There are forces akin to friction between the atoms in every body. There are even resistive forces within the Essay on Mark The Lost, structure of the atoms themselves.
We often think of atoms as being perfect, rigid bodies, but even this assumption is not true. So, the hard fact is, that even on best, the most fundamental level the simplistic view of the conservation of momentum is not perfectly true. It is almost true for patriarchy, low velocity impacts between elementary particles (certainly not true for relativistic impacts). So Newton was wrong? Absolutely not! Its only that we often do a sloppy job of accounting for bridesmaid speech, all the forces which act on and within a system. Patriarchy. If you neglect any force, then the answer is wrong.
Maybe its only slightly wrong and speech you don't care, but in the case of terminal ballistics involving large plastic deformations we simply cannot neglect the complex interactions of the materials. Most interesting terminal ballistic events involve hydrodynamic flows and in these situations the Essay on Mark Bixler's of Sudan, forces are continuous field functions acting in countless directions. Recall that energy may be expressed as force acting over a distance. One may then say that a certain quantity of energy, say 100 ft-lbs, is equivalent to raising 100 lbs up against gravity a distance of best bridesmaid speech, one foot. Here we see the difference between pure science and engineering. Science can easily give you an answer that is technically correct as far as it goes, but utterly useless and untruthful. In the literacy, real world, the example I just gave is true only if the weight is best, raised at quasi-static velocity, barely moving. It matters how fast you do something.
Fast work wastes energy. There is less efficiency and effectiveness in the work and more entropy is expended. Engineering is the business of looking at the real world complexities of mechanical (and other) systems using the principles of science. We often state that mass is conserved (none is lost) and that energy also is conserved. Mass and energy must be accounted for to mr.chips novel, preserve the whole truth of mechanics. For ballistic events, kinetic energy is converted to best bridesmaid speech, strain energy (causing both elastic and plastic deformation) and this energy is finally converted into thermal internal energy when the body assumes a rest state. All elastic and plastic cavity expansions result in some non-recoverable energy loss to entropy as well. This last fact of reality makes the dumbed down principle of the conservation of momentum an unrealizable ideal. However, we may still make good use of the expression developed by Newton. As an vs matriarchy, aside, the most dramatic demonstration of this elastic energy dissipation that I have seen was on a late night infomercial for some high tech golf clubs. The heads were made from best, a metallic glass that is composed of mr.chips novel, zirconium with a half dozen other metals mixed in to fully occupy all the spaces in the crystal lattice.
Imagine a box spring structure but with rigid braces placed all around the springs so that they can't flex anymore. A golfball was dropped in a tube onto a plate of this material at the same instant as other balls were dropped onto plates of stainless steel and titanium alloy. Best Bridesmaid. The motion damped out in about 10 seconds for the steel, maybe 15 or 20 for on Mark The Lost Boys of Sudan, the titanium, but the golf ball bounced on that metallic glass for best bridesmaid, over two minutes! A worse case of the bullet striking the block example was brought to my attention some time back, in which the literacy, conservation of momentum was again reduced to best bridesmaid speech, mass times velocity resultants, but the problem then went on songs, to compare the initial kinetic energy of the bullet to the final kinetic energy of the moving block and concluded by stating that the difference in these energies was absorbed by deformation and resistive forces. I say this is worse because it is almost correct and sounds correct, but isn't. You don't start with the idea that gross body motions must be preserved and then declare any discrepancies in energy to be resistive losses.
This is particularly important where hydrodynamic behavior dominates the problem. The correct solution is to treat the interaction at best speech a scale of resolution appropriate to the deformation, perform basic calculations of the fundamental equations of motion and visco-plastic deformation while numerically integrating, account for the energy explicitly at dracula: the impaler each step, and best bridesmaid then describe the gross body motions. Vs Matriarchy. Doing this manually is bridesmaid, out of the question, which is why the defense sector uses high powered computer workstations and finite element or finite difference methods. The reason why a simplistic assumption of preserving gross body motion does not work can be shown rather easily. If we describe an impact between two perfectly rigid bodies, m and M, the larger one of novelists, which is best speech, initially at rest, we may express the force exerted by the smaller mass on the larger at impact as: F = m d 2 s / dt 2 , and the force exerted by victorian, the larger mass on the impacting mass as: F = M d 2 s / dt 2. (Note: the forces are equal in magnitude and opposite in direction and the accelerations are not the same). However, we are interested in speech penetration, so we ought (at the very least) to model the the impaler, impact as a spring-mass system to indicate some elastic deformation. Let's concentrate on the larger mass (the target), recognizing that what applies to the target also applies in its own way to the projectile.
According to speech, Hooke's Law the force applied to a spring in elastic deformation is equal to the spring constant multiplied by the deformation distance. Bixler's The Lost Boys. For a spring-mass system, the total force exerted by and on the projectile is bridesmaid speech, given by: F = M d 2 s / dt 2 + K s. Observe that already the acceleration on the mass is reduced by mr.chips novel, the quantity Ks / M. The energy absorbed by the spring is described by: E = Integral (F ds) = ( K s 2 ) / 2 (assuming a linear spring behavior). This is why we put suspension systems on bridesmaid speech, dynamic systems (like automobiles). Literacy. If the acceleration on the mass is less, it doesn't move as far or as fast. Its that simple. In other words, the force varies with the internal mechanics of the bodies. Newton isn't violated.
I have said that this perfectly elastic view of mechanics is unrealistic because of the resistive forces in real matter. So, lets add some nonrecoverable energy losses. Real dynamic systems include damping, usually represented in simple models by a dashpot, which is a mechanism that uses fluid viscosity to resist movement (this is the same mechanism used by those mercury recoil reducers). The viscous fluid offers resistance in best proportion to the velocity of the mr.chips novel, motion. In consequence, the total force is best bridesmaid, expressed by: F = M d 2 s / dt 2 + D ds / dt + K s. The energy dissipated by the damper is given by: E = Integral (F ds) = Integral ( D v ds ). Vs Matriarchy. The acceleration is reduced by: ( Ks + Dv ) / M. Best Speech. Since in literacy in india each case the input is identical, we must conclude that the best bridesmaid speech, acceleration on the mass in patriarchy vs matriarchy the case of the viscous damped spring-mass system is less than the acceleration experienced by the rigid mass. In ballistic events a portion of the damping is governed by a velocity squared function.
Therefore, neglecting the bridesmaid, damping and elastic dissipation of energy results in an overestimate of imparted motion. The May/June 2002 issue of the impaler, Petersen's Rifle Shooter has an article entitled, Where Do the bridesmaid, Foot-Pounds Go? - Relating Kinetic Energy to Hunting Cartridge Effectiveness , which is much improved over the pseudoscience of patriarchy vs matriarchy, four years before, and even begins to address the best bridesmaid, conversion of kinetic and strain energy into residual internal energy; however, it introduces one misunderstanding worth clearing up. The article states that high velocity small bore bullets penetrate steel plates like truck leaf springs by melting the steel. This sort of mythology is prevalent in my field and seems plausible, but even shaped charge jets moving at 9000 m/s (29,500 fps) do not melt the steel armor plates that they penetrate, nor is the soft pure copper jet melted (this is not conjecture, it has been demonstrated). Mr.chips Novel. A shaped charge jet penetrates strictly using its velocity and density. The dynamic pressure vastly exceeds the strength of the steel and the penetration velocity exceeds the sound speed, so the steel effectively has no strength at all.
Most bullets do not penetrate so fast through steel targets that hydrodynamic flow conditions exist, but the force per unit area still governs the behavior. I have shot slabs of 6061-T6 aluminum with a variety of small arms ranging from the 5.56 x 45 mm M193 and M855 (SS109 type) bullets up to the .458 Win Mag using a 500 gr Hornady steel jacketed solid ( this is extremely dangerous - do not attempt it! ). At no stage in any of these penetration tests did melting occur, either in best the target or in the bullets (aluminum, copper and lead have much lower melting points than steel). Literacy In India. The bullets were recovered and best exhibited mechanical strain, which would not be evident if they had melted. The target exhibited similar behavior. Novelists. Any bullet capable of melting steel would leave scorch marks through tissue. Best Bridesmaid Speech. When was the last time you saw that? The author theorizes that the steam generated by all this heat transfer causes the violent cavitation during a bullet's passage through tissue. One need not guess at it. We know that dynamic pressure is responsible for cavitation in hydrodynamic penetration. Bullets actually deliver very little energy: 2000 ft-lbs is on Mark Bixler's The Lost of Sudan, 2700 J or just enough energy to light a 100 W bulb for 27 seconds.
I don't fault the bridesmaid speech, author of that article for the mistake, as even sources that ought to be authoritative in the defense field make similar errors with regard to penetration mechanics (I still regularly see references to in india, shaped charges producing plasma jets, and that sort of bridesmaid, misinformation). Real world penetration is best described as a fluid mechanics problem. For inviscid hydrodynamic flow, the dynamic pressure is (according to Bernoulli's Law) proportional to the fluid density and the square of the in india, velocity: P = ( rho / 2 ) v 2 . The force exerted on the bullet at the stagnation point is equal to the dynamic pressure multiplied by the presented area of the projectile in the direction of the flow, F = P A. Bridesmaid. The first thing that this tells you is that the songs, mass of the bullet has no direct bearing on the diameter of the cavity created - rather, that is governed by bridesmaid speech, shape and velocity. The kinetic energy expended during penetration is given by on Mark The Lost Boys of Sudan, the force exerted over the distance of travel by the bullet, or: E = F ds. So, the differential penetration depth, ds, is simply the kinetic energy divided by bridesmaid speech, the force acting on the projectile, ds = E / F. Penetration depth then clearly does depend on bullet mass (a component of kinetic energy). This expression could be integrated very easily (and conveniently) in terms of velocity. Unfortunately, for all the reasons laid out in this discussion the above is still too simplistic. Living tissue is not a Newtonian fluid. It is solid, with fluid characteristics in high velocity impact events. It obeys non-linear behavior laws. It is viscous and exhibits second-order damping effects, as well as compressibility and elasticity (fluids are inelastic and, notwithstanding popular mythology to the contrary, all fluids are compressible), so calculations of the Bixler's The Lost of Sudan, permanent cavity created by the bullet will be complex.
We need a velocity dependent drag function and a constitutive relation governing the best speech, strength, elasticity, compressibility and failure mechanisms of the target material(s). So, where do we go from here? Can we have an objective assessment of the novelists, effectiveness of our weapons? I think the best bridesmaid, answer is in the affirmative and hopefully the in india, next two sections will begin to give some hint as to that understanding.
College Essays: Buy Law Essay Uk top writing team! - Best 25+ Maid of honor speech ideas on Pinterest | Matron of honor - Cal Poly State University - San Luis Obispo
Nov 22, 2017 Best bridesmaid speech,
Food Service (Waitress Waiter) Resume Samples. Click the images to expand the resumes to a larger size. We have three resumes, and detailed explanations for how to write your own below. If you are an entry-level candidate (or have never been a waiter before), click here. If you need a food service cover letter, click here.
Attention line cooks, prep cooks, chefs, and best other food service workers — Don’t see your job here? Please view our full list of food service resume samples here. Click here to download. This MS Word Food Service Resume. Food Service Resumes (Text Versions Quick Facts) Restaurant Server (Chrono) Candidate uses a Reverse-Chronological resume format, and introduces the resume with a strong Career Objective Candidate emphasizes 7+ years of backmasked experience, and presents hard numerical evidence to prove she are a strong salesperson Candidate emphasizes depth of wine and entree knowledge to bridesmaid speech, play up her competence. RESTAURANT SERVER (REVERSE-CHRONOLOGICAL) 8870 Haven Street, Bloomington, IN 44590(141)-212-5465. Food Service Worker with 7+ years of dracula: experience in food preparation and service, and a certificate in Food Handling and Safety. Possesses a keen knowledge of speech wines, entrees, and the responsibilities of a successful restaurateur.
Faithfully adhere to the highest standards of hygiene, quality and customer service. Aiming to leverage my knowledge to effectively perform a management position at in india your restaurant. RIVERSIDE RESTAURANT Chicago, IL. Food Service Worker September 2011 – Present. Memorized restaurant’s wine stock and the meals they should accompany, leading to daily wine sales averaging $150, fully 20% higher than company average Write patrons’ food orders on best speech slips, memorize orders, or enter orders into computers for mr.chips novel, transmittal to kitchen staff in bridesmaid a 150+ seat restaurant Clean all work areas, equipment, utensils, dishes, and literacy silverware and ensure they are stored appropriately in accordance to state law.
Perform food preparation duties such as preparing salads, appetizers, and cold dishes, portioning salads, and brewing coffee in a fast-paced line kitchen. CARRABBA’S ITALIAN GRILL Chicago, IL. Trainee Food Service Worker August 2007 – July 2011. Present menus to patrons and answer questions about best bridesmaid menu items, making recommendations upon request in the impaler a 70+ seat restaurant Assisted host or hostess by answering phones to take reservations or to-go orders, and by bridesmaid greeting, seating, and backmasked songs thanking guests Stored food in designated containers and storage areas to prevent spoilage and increase shelf life Presented wine samples for guests to bridesmaid, taste and victorian opened the best, bottles for songs, them upon their approval Served food and beverages to patrons, and prepared or served specialty dishes at best bridesmaid speech tables as required. Certificate in vs matriarchy Food Handling and Safety, June 2008. Bachelor of Arts Degree in Culinary Arts, June 2007. Team worker who is able to adapt in highly dynamic and changing situations.
Excellent problem solving and communication skills, with a focus on best customer service Familiarity with Point of Sale terminals Bilingual (Spanish/English) Candidate uses a Combination resume format to emphasize achievements and in india skills, beginning with a Professional Profile introduction to present critical and best bridesmaid relevant information Candidate bolds key waitressing skill keywords in the Professional Profile section, and lists her achievements after them Candidate emphasizes her ability to “upsell” customers on alcoholic beverages. Three Key Server Waitress Skills: 1. Salesmanship: Ability to convince customers to make extra purchases by persuasively presenting entree wine pairings, selling desserts, and convincing patrons to dracula: the impaler, return to best speech, the establishment. 2. Communication: Ability to host, entertain, small talk, and speak fluidly in front of strangers at length. Backmasked? Ability to work together with other food service workers as a team, often working in pairs for bigger tables. Ability to keep a cool head when dealing with irate customers. 3. Management: Ability to best speech, teach new hosts and waiters how to present menu items, how to use Point of Sale (POS) Terminals, and test trainees for memorization of food ingredients.
Project Execution: Implemented new menu introduction strategies, increasing customer purchases of wine by 10% on average Management: Assisted in novelists the training of 6 new waiters, ensuring attention to detail and comprehensive understanding of restaurant methodology and bridesmaid speech practices Awards and Recognition: Frequently praised for mr.chips novel, excellent service on restaurant online rating system Salesmanship: Deep and broad knowledge of wines and appropriate entree pairings Communication: Fluent in English and Spanish – Excellent verbal and written skills. Familiarity with Point of best speech Sale (POS) and literacy in india common restaurant machinery Able to memorize entire menu within a day, including ingredient combinations Proven ability to “upsell” alcohol, dessert, and appetizers to customers Bilingual Spanish and speech English. Waitress | Los Angeles, CA | 2012 – Present. Memorized restaurant’s wine stock and appropriate entree pairings, leading to daily wine sales averaging $180, fully 15% higher than company average Wrote patron’s food orders on slips, memorized orders, and patriarchy managed food resources in a 120+ seat restaurant Operated POS terminals to input customer orders, swipe credit cards, and enter cash amounts received Received in-depth training for proper food handing techniques, including proper freezer placement, appropriate soup temperatures, and best bridesmaid equipment cleaning processes. Hostess Waitress | Los Angeles, CA | 2010 – 2012. Awarded “Employee of the Month” two months consecutively Bussed tables, presented menus, seated customers, and assisted waiters with drink orders Trained 3 new hosts in backmasked songs providing excellent customer service and conflict resolution techniques.
Florida State University, Orlando, FL. Bachelor of best bridesmaid Arts in patriarchy vs matriarchy English, May 2008. Three Transferable Skills for Food Service: 1. Customer Interactivity: If you have ever had any experience dealing with customers (whether you were scooping ice cream, greeting people at a front desk, operating a ticket booth, etc.), this type of experience is transferable into any other customer service job. 2. Best Bridesmaid? Technical: Have you ever swiped a credit card, operated a Point of Sale (POS) Terminal, or re-stocked receipt paper? All of these skills are transferable into food service. 3. Communication: Bilingual ability, especially Spanish, will help your food service career chances significantly. If you’ve ever had a job where you’ve had to speak in mr.chips novel front of other people, that kind of communication ability is best bridesmaid, considered transferable. 534 Shelby Avenue, Los Angeles, CA 24542 * (433) 623-6234 * [emailprotected]
Superior salesmanship skills, consistently outperforming company peers Friendly, outgoing, and charismatic personality well suited for the impaler, a fast paced, customer service oriented restaurant Experience with Point of Sale (POS) Terminals, with excellent basic math skills Working knowledge of best speech wines, cocktail mixes, and other bartending skills Conversational in Spanish. Awarded “Employee of the Month” for patriarchy vs matriarchy, consistently making achieving 15% above target sales Perfected menu presentation skills, providing customers a holistic understanding of the restaurant offerings, leading to more sales Trained 4 underperforming waiters in salesmanship methodology, increasing their sales to meet company average. Experience with 3 types of POS Terminals, receipt roll replacement, and coffee machine cleaning Familiarity with common restaurant bread cutting machines, dishwashers, and knowledge of equipment cleaning processes Excellent basic math skills, able to best bridesmaid, calculate and split bills in the event of POS Terminal downtime. Consistently scored over backmasked 90% satisfaction rating on customer feedback surveys Conversational in Spanish (able to take orders from Spanish speaking customers.) Possess excellent conflict resolution skills in bridesmaid the event of customer dissatisfaction. University of songs South Carolina, Columbia, SC. Bachelor of Science in Marketing, May 2005. 4 Steps to best bridesmaid speech, Writing the Ultimate Server Resume. “Food service” encompasses many different roles within a restaurant, cafeteria, or other food service establishment, such as waiters and servers, line cooks, bartenders, hosts and hostesses, and busboys. A waiter takes orders from a happy couple. These roles fall into what are called the “front end” (customer service) and the “back end” (food preparation) of the patriarchy vs matriarchy, establishments. Bridesmaid Speech? This resume is relevant to those of you with “front end” server experience.
We will teach you why this is an excellent resume, and how you can write your own in a similar fashion. As a professional food service worker, you may currently be writing your resume in mr.chips novel order to: Find a new working environment Earn more money Attain a managerial role. Read this resume writing guide to ensure you achieve your goals. By the way be sure to read our Resume Writing 10 Commandments to understand the bridesmaid speech, major rules that all resumes need to follow, including server resumes. If this seems difficult, you can always create a food service resume in patriarchy minutes with our widely praised resume maker. 1. Include These Key Server, Waitress, and Waiter Skills.
For some quick help, here are the key aspects you need to include on a server resume. Restaurant hiring managers will be looking for these specific traits to decide if you’re a worthwhile candidate. Be sure to include these key server skills on your resume. Keep in mind that if you have any food service certifications, such as a Certification in bridesmaid speech Food Handling and Safety, you should place it at the top of mr.chips novel your resume. If you don’t have any, you can land more interviews and potentially increase your salary by earning one. The National Restaurant Association offers certifications here. 2. Write a Convincing Career Objective. The first major section of your resume is called the Career Objective.
This applicant’s Career Objective IMMEDIATELY puts her on the short list for an interview because she included relevant information throughout the objective. There are four reasons this example has a strong Career Objective. Pay particular attention to the bolded parts: 1st: It immediately states years of experience: 7+ years of speech experience in dracula: food preparation and service…
2nd: It indicates earned titles or certificates: Certificate in Food Handling and Safety. 3rd: It emphasizes deep knowledge of the business: Keen knowledge of best speech wines, entrees , and the responsibilities of backmasked songs a successful restauranteur. 4th: It states the position she wants to fill: “Aiming to…effectively perform a management position at best speech your restaurant. “ In the songs, eyes of a hiring manager, this applicant’s Career Objective IMMEDIATELY puts her on the short list for an interview because she included great resume builders throughout the bridesmaid speech, objective. In India? It is also well written, and speech targeted at the managerial role she wants to fill. Good news! Food service manager roles are projected to increase by songs 11% through 2022. It’s very important to remember that the Career Objective does not relate to what YOU want from the job, but rather what you can do for the company . Bridesmaid Speech? In this way, the applicant makes a convincing argument that she’d be an asset to the company in mr.chips novel a managerial role. Our step by best step Career Objective writing guide can give you concrete ideas about how to write your own.
3. Backmasked Songs? Describe your Server Experience with Numbers. Adding numbers to bridesmaid, your job description bullet points will help the hiring manager grasp the size and songs scope of best your responsibilities, and give them a clearer mental picture of your experience. By quantifying your resume, it will immediately become better than the vast majority of your competition. The easiest way to patriarchy vs matriarchy, do this is to simply write how big your food establishment is, and how many seats it has. The applicant does this twice for the two establishments she worked in, as you can see from the best bridesmaid, bolded text below: Write patrons’ food orders on slips, memorize orders, or enter orders into dracula: the impaler, computers for transmittal to kitchen staff in a 150+ seat restaurant Present menus to patrons and answer questions about menu items, making recommendations upon request in a 70+ seat restaurant. Even by making this simple addition, your resume will immediately be better than the vast majority of your competition. If you really want to blow away the hiring manager, you’ll need to do more complex research, like this example: Memorized restaurant’s wine stock and the meals they should accompany, leading to daily wine sales averaging $150, fully 20% higher than company average. Do you know how much you make in best bridesmaid sales daily or monthly?
You can expect to make an victorian novelists average of best speech $47,960 per years as a Food Service Manager. Most restaurants — especially big chains — will track their servers’ sales statistics for the purposes of budgeting (and, of patriarchy course, to cajole low performers). You can ask your manager to see these statistics, and include them on your resume. Even if you didn’t perform spectacularly (like the applicant), simply including this information in your resume will indicate to the hiring manager that you are self-motivated and hard working. This is speech, called writing an “achievement oriented” resume — and these tend to literacy, land the best speech, most interviews.
Bonus: Action Verbs for dracula:, Your Server Resume. 4. Best? Include Relevant Additional Skills. Your Additional Skills section should not list your hobbies and patriarchy interests, unless they are relevant to the job. Being bilingual in Spanish and English is best bridesmaid, a valuable asset to have, especially for a managerial position. (For instance, a wine connoisseur would be a valuable asset to a restaurant that sells wine.) Since you are a professional food service worker, regardless if you are crafting a server resume or one seeking a more supervisory role, you should definitely include these bullet points in your Additional Skills section to build a stronger resume: Familiarity with Point of dracula: Sale terminals Problem solving and speech communication skills. If you also happen to be bilingual in Spanish and English, that also tends to be a valuable asset to have in a US based restaurant — especially for a managerial position. Candidate emphasizes having a Certification in Food Handling and Safety Candidate places Education Section first due to having recent school experience Candidate mentions her high customer satisfaction rating.
Getting the Education Section Right. All entry-level candidate resume must begin with the education section. Although this candidate has had prior work experience, it was as a trainee, or as a part-time worker. The most important reason the applicant is mr.chips novel, considered entry-level is best, because she just recently graduated from community college . This applicant has educational experience related to food service (Certificate in Food Handling and Safety, BA in Food Science). Understandably, you may not — and that’s fine. If you have no experience whatsoever, you’ll need to write a very convincing cover letter that the patriarchy vs matriarchy, employer should take a chance on best you. The education section on an entry-level resume can be more detailed and vs matriarchy whimsical than a professional resume , because it’s likely that you don’t have prior work experience. The hiring manager will be interested to know if you are generally an active person or not. Therefore, you can include information about:
Clubs you’ve joined Greek life you participate in Relevant coursework GPA (if above 3.5/4.0) Other Good Food Service Industry Samples. Waiter – Newjobs.com (Note: One of the few decent resume samples in best bridesmaid speech this industry on the net. The Professional Experience section introductory paragraphs are a bit overdone, and could instead use more bullet points. Otherwise, this is a great sample.) Waiter- career-development-help.com (Note: A simple, but effective resume. Has a well done “Professional Profile”.) Cook – CC.edu (Note: Overall an vs matriarchy excellent resume, although the Work Experience section is not formatted very well.) Share Food Service (Waitress #038; Waiter) Resume Samples Our code geeks and HR experts are proud to introduce our new Free Resume Builder software to help you land more interviews in today’s competitive job market.
Put your skills to the test, and songs learn how to make your resume 6 second worthy! 3 Reasons Why I Wouldn't Hire Tom Brady. Tom Brady’s resume is a couple yards short of a touchdown. Best? There are tons of errors throughout. See why. How to Modify and Maximize your Resume Template. Need a resume template?
Feel free to download one, but be sure to make small modifications to unlock your. Would You Rather Work for a Man or a Woman? Do people still care whether they work for a man or woman, or do most people simply look for a nice job. Resume Builder Comparison | Resume Genius vs. LinkedIn Labs.
What are the differences between the backmasked, major online resume builders? Here's an in depth analysis of what. Resume Genius' builder, resources, advice and best bridesmaid speech career tips are regularly featured on some of the world's leading online and offline publications including: Our code geeks and HR experts are proud to introduce our new Free Resume Builder software to in india, help you land more interviews in best bridesmaid speech today's competitive job market. HR-proven resume templates, built-in job description bullet point phrases to choose from, and easily export to MS Word and PDF.
I Need Someone Write My Paper - Write My Paper For Me Pay - Maid of Honor Speech Ideas & Tips to Help you Give a Killer Toast - Newcastle University
Nov 22, 2017 Best bridesmaid speech,
Alice Paul Essays and Research Papers. Alice Paul was born on bridesmaid speech January 11,1885, in Moorestown, New Jersey. Literacy! Her father, who died when Alice was . sixteen, was a businessman, banker, and best speech property owner. The Pauls lived in the small Quaker community of songs, Moorestown. One of the beliefs of the Quakers was equality of the sexes. As a young girl, Alice attended the Quaker suffrage meetings with her mother.
Alice Pauls ' father left them enough money so she could attend the exclusive Swarthmore College in Pennsylvania. Alice Paul , Equal Rights Amendment , National Woman's Party 929 Words | 8 Pages. Alice Paul , a highly intelligent college graduate of the Progressive era, was a key American suffragist and activist. Along with . Lucy Burns and others, she led a successful campaign for women's suffrage that resulted in best bridesmaid speech, the passage of the Nineteenth Amendment to literacy, the U.S. Constitution in 1920. In the HBO movie Iron Jawed Angels Alice Paul is best bridesmaid played by Hilary Swank, where her suffragist movement is shown in great detail and patriarchy high perspective. Bridesmaid! The many hardships and battles Alice Paul had encountered. Alice Paul , Elizabeth Cady Stanton , National American Woman Suffrage Association 1037 Words | 3 Pages. Analysis Paper #1: Iron-Jawed Angels Iron-Jawed Angels is a film which portrays the 1920’s women’s suffrage movement. Novelists! They led the struggle for . the bridesmaid, passage of the 19th amendment to the constitution which gave women the right to vote.
Alice Paul and Lucy Burns along with other strong women petitioned, campaigned, and picketed to backmasked songs, publicize the bridesmaid, issue. After being arrested for “traffic violations” a group of women spent time in Occoquan Workhouse. Here they went on a hunger strike to protest. Alice Paul , Iron Jawed Angels , Lucy Burns 1518 Words | 4 Pages. strongest sense of reality that I gained after watching Iron Jawed Angles is the ability of women to make an impact on other women. It is this contagious . Patriarchy Vs Matriarchy! feeling among women suffragists that hold them together through various difficulties. For example, Alice Paul’s public demonstration for women’s voting right eventually even gained the support in the passage of Nineteenth Amendment. When one of the suffragist fell down because of extreme fatigue, when public parade and demonstration is physically disturbed.
Alice Paul , Iron Jawed Angels , Lucy Burns 1849 Words | 5 Pages. precedent in being organizational leaders in the women’s movement. Alice Paul (January 11, 1885 to best bridesmaid, July 9, 1977), an dracula: American . suffragist leader and best bridesmaid an American feminist who risked her life to fight for women’s citizenship and the right to vote. Alice Paul joined the National American Woman Suffrage Association and dracula: was appointed Chairwoman of their Congressional Committee in bridesmaid, Washington, DC after she graduated from Pennsylvania. Patriarchy Vs Matriarchy! Paul worked with Lucy Burns against conservative forces in order to pass. Alice Paul , National American Woman Suffrage Association , Nineteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution 2588 Words | 6 Pages. order for the female population to freely cast her vote in a male dominated society.
The purpose of this paper is to depict an era when women were viewed no . different from chattels whose main purpose was to serve men, and the courage that ladies like Paul and Burns mustered in order to pave the way of recognition of bridesmaid speech, women’s rights and suffrage. Backmasked Songs! On the same vein, this paper will emphasize the importance of suffrage which more often than not has been taken for granted by those bestowed with such privileges. Alice Paul , Democracy , Equal Rights Amendment 1689 Words | 4 Pages. ? Alice Paul February 2, 2014 Did you ever wonder how women got their rights, and who helped . Speech! make that happen? There were many women that helped get their rights in the past, such as Alice Stokes Paul . Alice Paul was a suffragist and women’s right activist that was born on January 11th 1885 in Moorestown, New Jersey, USA. She changed the world in many different ways, however she did go through tough times while making change to the world. Although Alice was only. Alice Paul , Democracy , Equal Rights Amendment 577 Words | 2 Pages. it beautifully in this drama/romance that should be added to our High School library for all young women to see. Swank portrays a young defiant, . Alice Paul , a political activist in mr.chips novel, Iron Jawed Angels, in speech, which the director, Katja von Garni re-creates the patriarchy, history of the beginning of an end to women’s suffrage.
The heart warming, true story of Alice Paul and Lucy Barnes is riveting to speech, the soul. If you’re a mother, daughter, or a woman in today’s world you can thank these women for mr.chips novel giving us our freedom. Alice Paul , Elizabeth Cady Stanton , Hilary Swank 535 Words | 2 Pages. Best Bridesmaid! have become more independent and now have a say in the government if they choose too. The movie Iron Jawed Angels depicts a group of women who wanted women . to have a voice in politics. First thing they had to dracula: the impaler, do was get women the right to best, vote. Alice Paul and Lucy Burns were the two leaders of the NWP (National Woman's Party). The two women are an inspiration to others. They stood up for how they felt, and dracula: the impaler were not going to let anyone get in their way. They felt so strongly about women's rights that. Alice Paul , English-language films , Iron Jawed Angels 643 Words | 2 Pages. ?Iron Jawed Angels The movie Iron Jawed Angels is a movie about Lucy Stone and Alice Paul along with other suffragettes are . fighting for speech the right to vote. The women go through many struggles to get thus right.
Three main characteristics the women show are honesty, courage, and determination. To begin with, honesty is shown throughout the whole movie. First, while the women were protesting the women were honest about what they had done. For example, when the patriarchy vs matriarchy, women were arrested they told. Alice Paul , Bill Clinton , Lucy Burns 400 Words | 2 Pages. Best Bridesmaid! Iron Jawed Angels, Alice Paul showed great leadership in her fight for woman’s suffrage. She not only went against the odds but . she also took command by starting the WNP, separating herself from NAWSA. Alice Paul showed strength and courage as she picketed in front of the patriarchy, White House as well as starving herself in prison, starting a hunger strike. Best Speech! Another prime example of leadership is Lucy Burns, who was a visionary that took action in fighting for woman’s rights alongside Alice . After being thrown. Alice Paul , Carrie Chapman Catt , Leadership 693 Words | 2 Pages.
Angels starts off focusing on two well-to-do women named Alice Paul and Lucy Burns. After participating in the women’s suffrage . movement in England as suffragettes, the two ladies decided to mr.chips novel, spread this ideal in best bridesmaid speech, America. At the patriarchy, time, there was already a National American Woman Suffrage Association (NAWSA), but the association did not go to the lengths of suffrage that they were looking for. Instead, the National Women’s Party was created. With Paul and Burns leading this party, NWP was able to progress. Alice Paul , English-language films , National Woman's Party 512 Words | 2 Pages. ALICE AND WONDERLAND At the begenning of the story do we find Alice asleep or is bridesmaid she still perplesed and unsure if this . Mr.chips Novel! great adventure is a real one.
Everything is best bridesmaid speech questionable to her on the amazing journey. It is literacy in india written that she is the one that will slay the dragon so all of the creatures await her arrival. They are not yet sure if she is the Alice they are looking for or if she the wrong one. Speech! Like alice some of us are called to take this journey into mr.chips novel the unconcious. Best Bridesmaid Speech! she is confronted. Alice , Alice in Wonderland , Alice's Adventures in Wonderland 986 Words | 3 Pages. ‘Tough Alice ’ Extended Analysis Twelve Impossible Things Before Breakfast, is a collection of stories that vary from songs, parodies to extended . variations of famous fantasy stories. Best Bridesmaid! Jane Yolen, challenged the most popular children’s story ever, Alice in Wonderland by Lewis Carroll and created a more upbeat Wonderland with a more hard-hitting Alice than usual. The original Alice in Wonderland is a tale about a girl who falls asleep and dreams about mr.chips novel this magical and adventurous land known as Wonderland. Alice in Wonderland , Alice's Adventures in Wonderland , Cheshire Cat 1309 Words | 3 Pages.
Child Alice in Wonderland is a Disney movie based on Lewis Carroll’s novel Alice’s Adventure in Wonderland. The movie Alice in best bridesmaid, . Wonderland is one of Disney’s unique productions with distinctive characters and also a plot line. The initial story started with a plot in which Alice was sitting by victorian novelists, a river bank with her older sister as she reads a borrowed book. The book was boring, didn’t have any images, had no conversation, and wasn’t interesting for Alice . In the Disney version of Alice in Wonderland. Best Speech! Alice in Wonderland , Alice's Adventures in Wonderland , Gender role 1562 Words | 4 Pages. Title: Alice in patriarchy, Wonderland Title: Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland is best bridesmaid a fantasy book which contains the Boys of Sudan, elements of the adulthood and . the childhood. When Alice looked at her sister’s book, which does not contain any pictures or conversation, she started to think about adult stuff. Later her journey to the adult world started in a funny and fantastic way. The changes in her body and the events that she came across show us her understanding of the best, adult world. In Wonderland, she sees events.
1990s music groups , Alice in Wonderland , Alice's Adventures in Wonderland 1002 Words | 3 Pages. Miscommunication between Alice and Essay Bixler's of Sudan Humpty Dumpty in ''Through the Looking Grass'' by best bridesmaid speech, Lewis Caroll Reading a passage from Lewis Caroll's . ''Through the Looking Glass'' helps a reader to explore the many reasons for the miscommunication between Alice and Humpty Dumpty. Most of the mr.chips novel, time it seems that both of them live, speak, and best behave differently. From the very beginning a reader can tell that their conversation will not be a normal one: Humpty Dumpty does not even look at Alice while he is talking. Alice Liddell , Alice's Adventures in Wonderland , Birthday 874 Words | 3 Pages. curious creatures who tend to behave in a bizarre and peculiar manner. As Alice ventures out on her journey in Wonderland and comes into . contact with these different creatures, she quickly realizes that politeness and good behavior is not responded to in a positive way.
In spite of Alice’s attempts to be amiable and pleasant, the mr.chips novel, creatures of Wonderland continue to be rude to her, as well as to each other. Although Alice learns of Wonderland’s eccentricities shortly after falling into the rabbit. Alice in Wonderland , Alice's Adventures in best bridesmaid, Wonderland , Cheshire Cat 895 Words | 3 Pages. Mr.chips Novel! Austin Way English I Mr. Best! Keiter February 28, 2013 Alice and Coraline Comparison The book Alice in Wonderland was . written by Lewis Carroll. Coraline was written by Bixler's of Sudan, Neil Gaiman. Each book was later turned into films to help better get a picture of the adventurous lands the girls traveled through. In the movies Alice in Wonderland and Coraline there are many similarities but also many differences. Best Bridesmaid Speech! Though having many differences and similarities each film taught a lesson to the audience by. Alice in Wonderland , Alice's Adventures in Wonderland , Cheshire Cat 875 Words | 3 Pages. ? ALICE WALKER Alice Walker was an activist and feminist because she protested for the right of blacks to vote in Georgia and novelists . Mississippi.
She was against racism and also sexism. On March 8th 2003, 5,000 protestors and Alice Walker marched from Malcolm X Park to bridesmaid speech, the White House for women to have the same human rights as men. On Mark The Lost Boys! She also made an best bridesmaid speech activist group with 60 other female activists in order to persuade Israel and Egypt to open their borders in Gaza. Songs! She wrote and bridesmaid supported various civil rights. Activism , Alice Walker , Howard Zinn 1061 Words | 3 Pages. ------------------------------------------------- Alice in Wonderland You may have thought Alice in Wonderland was just a . children’s tale that everyone takes too seriously but there is more philosophy, metaphors, and mr.chips novel spirituality in this revolutionary children’s book than you can fit into one teapot! It seems everyone from my generation and up has heard the story, read the best bridesmaid speech, book, or watched the movie at some point in their lives. Alice in Wonderland started as a book written in 1865 by Charles Lutwidge. It is patriarchy about a girl named Alice who sees. Best Bridesmaid! Alice in Wonderland , Alice's Adventures in dracula:, Wonderland , Cheshire Cat 1708 Words | 4 Pages. Best! Looking-Glass relate to a dream-like world that is full of adventures that of which a young girl, Alice , accompanied by various animals, . Victorian Novelists! insects, and best speech imaginary characters experience.
Carroll has not only created an abstract character group, but has also taken Alice from our ordinary world and put her into a world of playing cards and chess pieces. Through all of the nonsense that is patriarchy vs matriarchy depicted in Alice , an important theme is growing up. The senselessness of best bridesmaid speech, Alice's dream world becomes a contradiction. Literacy In India! Alice in Wonderland , Alice's Adventures in Wonderland , Cheshire Cat 1099 Words | 3 Pages. Best Speech! considered a wise decision, because following this approach consequently would result in a whole new, modern Alice without much in common with . its original. The book “Alles uber Alice ”, from which the Flemming translation is dracula: the impaler taken, works with comments that explain many of the backgrounds and allusions. These comments are also a translation from an English original (Carroll; Gardner. The Annotated Alice , 1990) Along the bridesmaid, same lines, the translator has to dracula:, consider whether expressions typical for best speech a specific. The Impaler! Alice in Wonderland , Alice's Adventures in Wonderland , German language 1651 Words | 5 Pages. ? Alice Walker Karin Leiva November 6, 2012 Lisa Evans English 9 Leiva 1 . Best! Alice Malsenior Walker was born on February 9, 1944 in Eatonton, Georgia. Bixler's! She is an American author, poet, and activist. She has written both fiction and essays about gender and race. Her writing mostly focuses on bridesmaid the role of women of mr.chips novel, color in their culture and history.
Alice Walker actually expresses’ her feeling in any of her works. She usually reflects on best speech herself. African American , Alice Walker , Black people 1735 Words | 5 Pages. LaFlair 1 Professor Rhonda Rodriguez English 209 17 March 2014 Alice Walker As a writer, Alice Walker deals with many . issues, most of victorian, which concern historical and modern race problems in bridesmaid speech, America. Through this she brings to national attention the cruelty and inhumane abuse that African Americans have endured. This general topic can be broken down into many areas that she feels are important for people to know and to Bixler's The Lost Boys, learn from. Alice walker was born on bridesmaid the ninth of February in backmasked, 1944, In Eatonton.
African American , Alice Walker , Epistolary novel 2066 Words | 8 Pages. people turn to reading. Bridesmaid! Reading for pleasure has become more popular in the past century than it has ever been before. Alice Munro is a . fascinating Canadian short story writer whose stories can take readers to victorian novelists, a much needed get away. Alice Laidlaw was born on July 10, 1931, the speech, eldest of three siblings, born to backmasked songs, Robert Laidlaw, a fox farmer, and Anne Clark Laidlaw, a teacher. Alice began writing as a teenager in the 1940's. Bridesmaid! She published her first story while a student at the Western Ontario University. Alice Munro , Anton Chekhov , Fiction 1187 Words | 3 Pages. an alternative kind of literacy in india, fiction. The main character central to the notion of morals is The Duchess. Bridesmaid Speech! At first she is quite rude to Alice , but . later we see friendliness and respect towards her. The Duchess is “inconsistent, unpleasant and pointlessly didactic” (Leach, 92) and her belief is that “Everything’s got a moral, if only victorian novelists, you can find it” (Carroll, 106). “ Alice , on best bridesmaid the other hand, reasserts her innocence and prudence by maintaining that things don't always have morals and should be accepted.
Alice in Wonderland , Alice's Adventures in Wonderland , Cheshire Cat 1534 Words | 4 Pages. Victorian! ? Alice in wonderland by Lewis Carroll This book was published in 1865, and the numbers of page are 124, including extras. Genre: Story, . Fiction. Alice in wonderland is a story that Carroll created from speech, a little girl that he met, called Alice Liddell. In this book it tells of a girl named Alice who falls down a rabbit hole into a fantasy world populated by peculiar creatures, there she begins her adventures. The tale plays with logic, giving the story lasting popularity with adults as well as. Alice in Essay on Mark The Lost of Sudan, Wonderland , Alice Liddell , Alice's Adventures in Wonderland 1096 Words | 3 Pages. ? Alice in best, Wonderland Alice in backmasked, Wonderland is a well-known film produced in 1951. A remade modern version of the movie was made . in 2010. The movie is an American live action/computer animated fantasy film directed by best bridesmaid, Tim Burton. It was released by Walt Disney Pictures, one of Hollywood’s “Big Six” film studios, and film stars including Johnny Depp, Mia Wasikowska, Helena Bonham Carter and mr.chips novel Anne Hathaway. The movie is best bridesmaid speech based on a nineteen year old girl named Alice going onto backmasked an audacious adventure.
Alice in Wonderland , Alice's Adventures in Wonderland , Helena Bonham Carter 1339 Words | 4 Pages. Alice in best, Wonderland - Summary by Paragraphs. Chapter 1. Down the rabbit hole Alice sits impatiently by her sister who’s reading a book. She is distracted by a white rabbit taking out a . watch out of his coat pocket and runs down into a rabbit hole after him, falls for some time into dracula: the impaler a deep well, wakes up later in a small room. She finds doors, but the key is too small. She finds a small door, unlocks it with the key, but she’s too large to fit in it. If only she could shot up like a telescope. She turns and best speech finds a bottle on which is says Drink.
Alice in Wonderland , Alice's Adventures in Wonderland , Cheshire Cat 1476 Words | 4 Pages. Bixler's The Lost! while Alice is walking in the forest he explains to her that everyone in wonderland is mad even Alice , which is why she is there. . Alice did not agree with the Cheshire-Cat but continued on her way to see the March Hare anyways. Speech! Being mad or crazy does not always make a person bad. Patriarchy Vs Matriarchy! In fact the Cheshire-Cat was right, all the bridesmaid speech, people in on Mark Bixler's, Wonderland were indeed mad and they were all there for that reason. In every classic story there are good characters versus bad characters. In the book, Alice in speech, Wonderland.
Alice in mr.chips novel, Wonderland , Alice's Adventures in Wonderland , Cheshire Cat 935 Words | 3 Pages. Alice in Wonderland Literary Analysis. Alice In Wonderland Literary Analysis Many themes are explored when reading Lewis Carrol’s, Alice in Wonderland. Themes of . childhood innocence, child abuse, dream, and others. Bridesmaid! Reading the story, it was quite clear to see one particular theme portrayed through out the book: child to backmasked, adult progression. Alice in Wonderland is full of best, experiences that lead Alice to becoming more of herself and that help her grow up. In India! It’s a story of trial, confusion, understanding, and success. And more confusion. Though. Alice in Wonderland , Alice's Adventures in Wonderland , Cheshire Cat 1686 Words | 5 Pages. Bridesmaid! a little girl named Alice , Carroll echoes his opinions of a government and its society’s relationship. Mr.chips Novel! Throughout the story, Alice’s split . personality is reemphasized with every new conflict or encounter.
Both personalities work hand in bridesmaid, hand, with one being juvenile and the other acting as a scolding conscience. Often, when a government imposes rules, society impulsively mirrors these rules to their own personal values. Carroll references to said concept by showing Alice “scolding” herself for. 1990s music groups , Alice in Wonderland , Alice's Adventures in Wonderland 956 Words | 3 Pages. ? Alice in Wonderland – Book Review Alice and Wonderland is a novel written by a man named Lewis Carroll (real name Charles . Lutwidge Dodgson). In India! It tells the story of a girl named Alice who falls down a rabbit hole into this fantasy ‘wonderland’. This novel tells us about Alice’s weird and wonderful adventures down the bridesmaid, rabbit hole and the unusual characters she encounters. She follows a white rabbit that was talking to Essay Boys of Sudan, himself, wearing a waistcoat and had a pocket watch, down the rabbit hole. She. Alice in Wonderland , Alice's Adventures in Wonderland , Cheshire Cat 1213 Words | 2 Pages. Tim Burton’s Alice in bridesmaid, Wonderland is an absolutely visually stunning film.
The stand-out features in this film would be, the use of colour to . tell a story or set a mood, the unique costume and make-up designs and the use of special effects and animations. There are a few disappointments, but nothing bad enough to make me not love the film. The film begins with Alice (Mia Wasikowska) at the age of backmasked, 6, troubled by a reoccurring dream. Alice explains to her father that in her dreams she meets and sees. Alice in bridesmaid, Wonderland , Alice's Adventures in Wonderland , Helena Bonham Carter 1020 Words | 3 Pages. somewhere.
It could begin with a leap of faith, a glint of hope, or just a flicker of curiosity. In Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland, by Lewis Carroll, . curiosity is what brings Alice , a young British girl, to the start of her incredible, yet puzzling expedition. Her journey through Wonderland is strange, but through her experiences, Alice grows up along the way. Mr.chips Novel! Through his use of symbolism, Lewis Carroll displays that it is a struggle for a child to best, make the transition into adult life. The character of. Adult , Alice in Wonderland , Alice's Adventures in Wonderland 924 Words | 3 Pages. not take place in normal reality and in fact in “Wonderland” although Alice never does find out the true name of the world she dreamt of. The . word “Wonderland” only appears until the literacy in india, last two pages of the novel when Alice's sister reflects on best Alice's dream. 2. What are the conflicts in backmasked songs, Alice in Wonderland?
What types of conflict (physical, moral, intellectual, or emotional)? The most prominent intellectual conflict in Alice in Wonderland is her ability to make sense of the nonsensical world she. Alice in Wonderland , Alice's Adventures in Wonderland , Cheshire Cat 2316 Words | 6 Pages. Alice in Wonderland, a Bildungsroman. Discovery in best bridesmaid speech, Wonderland The bildungsroman novel Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland, by Lewis Carroll elucidates the idea of mr.chips novel, humans . needing to be faced with a drastic situation, in order to grow and develop their own identity. Best Bridesmaid! Alice begins in the novel as a respectful and naive child, one typical of the Victorian Era. Vs Matriarchy! She struggles with adjusting to the new situations, as well as the growth and changes of her body. Speech! Alice’s escapades in Wonderland allow her to change her views. 2007 singles , Alice in Wonderland , Alice's Adventures in Wonderland 952 Words | 3 Pages. The Maturation of Alice in Wonderland.
shed, and adulthood is victorian reached. This is shown in the decisions that Alice must make, and the things that she experiences regarding trust, . puzzles, lessons, and speech power. Alice uses the whimsical and mystical creatures and situations in Wonderland to make the difficult realization that adult world will be different from the world that she is victorian novelists used to speech, as a child, easier to accept as she slowly loses her child-like innocence. The Lost Boys! Alice has to make decisions concerning who, and what, to trust as she encounters. Alice in Wonderland , Alice's Adventures in Wonderland , Dormouse 1330 Words | 4 Pages. school. It got an best bridesmaid A. With use of this essay cite works to Kristin's People Places and Things Tewksbury, MA: Free paper Inc., 1999./center br br . brLewis Carroll's works Alice's Adventures in Wonderland Through the Essay Bixler's of Sudan, Looking Glass and What Alice Found There are by many people considered nonsense books for children. Of course, they are, but they are also much more. Lewis Carroll had a great talent of intertwining nonsense and logic, and therefore creating sense within nonsense.
If you look. Alice in Wonderland , Alice's Adventures in Wonderland , Cheshire Cat 1796 Words | 5 Pages. Alice Munro's collection of short stories in best speech, Open Secrets is patriarchy one example of her focus on best bridesmaid women, ordinary women, and the lives they experience . and lead. Her stories present us with characters that think, feel, and develop in normal, as well as abnormal, situations. Patriarchy Vs Matriarchy! In the following discussion we focus on two of her short stories from Open Secrets, and confer the best bridesmaid speech, characters and vs matriarchy their development.
The stories chosen for examination are Open Secrets and best speech Vandals. Each of them will be discussed individually. Alice Munro , Female , Girl 1554 Words | 5 Pages. The Tim Burtonization of Alice in Wonderland. THE TIM BURTONIZATION OF ALICE IN WONDERLAND An essay on Alice in Wonderland Novel by Lewis Caroll Film adaptation by Tim . Burton In 1962, film critic Andrew Sarris points out a repeating movement of Bixler's of Sudan, ideas and images throughout a filmmaker’s body of work. This later on becomes the basis of Auteur theory which describes the authorship of the filmmaker who despite is working within the bounds of a studio system is able to imprint his/her ideologies and personal style into his/her films. According. Alice in Wonderland , Alice's Adventures in Wonderland , Danny Elfman 1366 Words | 4 Pages. Adventures in Wonderland presents a girl who transforms immensely from the bored little girl who can’t imagine reading a book without pictures to the mature . adult described at the end of the novel.
Throughout much of the bridesmaid, novel, the reader witnesses Alice struggling with frequent, rapid changes in her body. While the repeated size changes in the book serve to illustrate the difficulties of children in grasping the changes of puberty, the changes in literacy, Alice’s personality and state of mind that come with. Alice in Wonderland , Alice's Adventures in bridesmaid, Wonderland , Change 2155 Words | 6 Pages. Alice in Wonderland Dream Analysis. Dream Analysis of Alice in Wonderland Who’s who and what’s real; are we who we claim we are, and is reality really real or is everything just . a fragment of what we think is the universe? A dream sequence is a technical term used mostly in literacy, film and television to set apart a brief interlude from the main story. (Wikipedia) The deeper lying theme that Carroll wanted to incorporate into his story of Alice in Wonderland and Through the Looking Glass, in my opinion, was not his psychological. Alice in Wonderland , Alice's Adventures in Wonderland , Cheshire Cat 893 Words | 3 Pages. Nonsense as a Consolation for speech Loss Alice in Wonderland is a tale that ends with death, and violence lurks within all of its nonsense. . Throughout the book, Alice grows and matures, just like we do; however, all journeys must come to a close and death is always at the end of the of Sudan, road. Carroll neither forestalls, nor denies the realities of death and loss in best, his book.
If anything, he manifests the prevalence of its threat in everything. Instead Carroll soothes his readers for the pain and loss with. Alice in Wonderland , Alice's Adventures in Wonderland , Mad Hatter 1273 Words | 4 Pages. Studies in Literature Dallas, Tx. Victorian Novelists! Alice Walker Poet, short story writer, novelist, essayist, anthologist, teacher, editor, publisher, . womanist and activist, Alice Malsenior Walker was born at home on February 9, 1944, near Ward’s Chapel, a neighboring community of Eatonton, Georgia. She is the eighth and last child of Willie Lee Walker and Minnie Lou Tallulah Grant Walker. In 1994, Walker changed her middle name to Tallulah-Kate, in honor of best bridesmaid, her maternal great-grandmother, the African-Cherokee.
African American , Alice Walker , Black people 1401 Words | 4 Pages. ?How do the editing and mise en scene help to construct meaning and provoke response in the ‘ Alice in Wonderland’? In Tim Burton’s 2010 remake . of ‘ Alice in Wonderland’, the micro features that relate to his production style give the classic narrative a quirky and alternative edge. I have chosen to analyse the scene where Alice makes her entrance into ‘Wonderland’ and meets some of the backmasked, main characters. In this scene the director uses lighting, editing and mise en scene to present the idea of an ‘alternative. Alice in Wonderland , Alice's Adventures in Wonderland , Christopher Lee 1452 Words | 4 Pages. The Allegory in Alice in Wonderland. The Allegory in Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland Alice in best bridesmaid, wonderland is an adventurous book full of mystery, conflicts, and surprisingly . allegory. Mr.chips Novel! Alice goes through trails, revelations, and at one point even gets accused of best, “being the wrong Alice .” In this story, Alice believes that she is dreaming and having a weird one at that, but in reality she is not really dreaming.
Alice is really trying to find herself and with that she is portraying the conflicts in her life through the world of. Alice in Wonderland , Alice's Adventures in Wonderland , John Tenniel 1033 Words | 3 Pages. concepts in both this story and Through the Looking-Glass; examples include: In chapter 1, Down the Rabbit-Hole, in the midst of shrinking, . Alice waxes philosophic concerning what final size she will end up as, perhaps going out altogether, like a candle; this pondering reflects the concept of a limit. In chapter 2, The Pool of Tears, Alice tries to perform multiplication but produces some odd results: Let me see: four times five is twelve, and four times six is thirteen, and four times. Alice in Wonderland , Alice's Adventures in Wonderland , Cheshire Cat 1155 Words | 4 Pages. Alice Wonderland, Theme of Bizarre. On Mark Bixler's Boys! composers of Alice in Wonderland the novel and the film, and the Life of Pi the novel, have created a world that is both weird and best bridesmaid speech wonderful. Victorian! . They have done this through their selected forms, use of language and bridesmaid film techniques to in india, highlight the bridesmaid, bizarre and transform it into a world that seems real. Lewis Carrol uses the form of a fairy tale to describe Alice’s adventure down the rabbit hole, Tim Burton focuses on visual techniques to emphasise the extraordinary or supernatural nature of the Alice in Wonderland.
Alice in Wonderland , Alice's Adventures in Essay Bixler's The Lost Boys, Wonderland , Mad Hatter 1000 Words | 3 Pages. Alice Munro and Anton Chekhov: A Comparative Analysis Ms. Sangita L. Bridesmaid Speech! Patil Research Scholar, Shivaji University, Kolhapur . (India) The comparative analysis of the literacy, stories of two famous contemporary writers Alice Munro and Anton Chekhov gives an opportunity to follow the development of the speech, genre of short stories in Canadian and in Russian literature. The Impaler! Both are stalwarts of their respective literature. Commenting on the greatness of A. Chekhov, E. B. Tager writes: As. Alice Munro , Anton Chekhov , Eudora Welty 1695 Words | 5 Pages. their personality traits illustrates the significant contribution made by literature in the realization of the narrative theory of identity. One of the . superior examples of this relationship between literature and narrative theory of identity is Alice Munro’s “An Ounce of Cure” and the author has been celebrated as making observations on the episodic nature of life through her stories. “An Ounce of Cure” presents an important episodic nature of bridesmaid speech, life through the mid-teenage problems and patriarchy vs matriarchy crises in.
Adolescence , Alice Munro , Character 1536 Words | 4 Pages. WITHIN THE FAMILY IN ALICE WALKER’S ‘THE COLOR PURPLE’. Alice Malsenior Walker (born February 9, 1944) is an American author, . poet, and activist who is known for the various essays and poems on race. Among all her works, she is best known for the Pulitzer prized literary work titled The Color Purple. The Color Purple reveals the best bridesmaid speech, brutal reality of imposed feminine stereotypes and Essay on Mark Bixler's The Lost Boys the terrible effects of a male dominated society. Through a powerful first-person account, Alice Walker is able to tell. Abuse , Alice Walker , Domestic violence 1595 Words | 4 Pages. ?Erika Patton Dr. Lohman Intro to Literature M-7:45 Evaluation/Analysis on Alice Walker: Everyday Use Introduction/Evaluation . Best Speech! Alice Walker, an African American author and activist born in Eatonton, Georgia in 1944 (p.
69). Walker was like most African Americans in her time raised by hard-working underpaid parents, this is reflected in her writing. Alice Walker and her now removed husband were the first interracial couple in Mississippi. Once a poet, Walker worked with other influential authors. African American , Alice Walker , Baltimore 809 Words | 3 Pages. ALICE MUNRO'S THE ALBANIAN VIRGIN IN OPEN SECRETS EXEMPLIES HER CHARACTERISTIC APPROACH To try to trace Alice Munro's . narrative techniques to any particular development in the short story The Albanian Virgin would be difficult. This could be because it is dracula: simply written from careful observations as are many of her other short stories.
In her short stories, it is as though she tries to transform a common, ordinary world into best speech something that is unsettling and mysterious as was seen in Vandals. Alice Munro , Anton Chekhov , Fiction 1505 Words | 4 Pages. On the bank of a tranquil river, Alice (Kathryn Beaumont) grows bored listening to her older sister read aloud from a history book about . William I of England. Alice's sister scolds her, gently but firmly, for her lack of attention. At that moment, Alice dreams of living in in india, a world of nonsense (A World of My Own, as she explains and sings to her little kitten Dinah).
Just then, Alice sees a White Rabbit (Bill Thompson) wearing a waistcoat and carrying a large pocket watch. She and Dinah follow him. Alice in Wonderland , Alice's Adventures in best speech, Wonderland , Cheshire Cat 980 Words | 3 Pages. Backmasked! 2014 2013 Nobel Prize Winner in Literature Alice Munro’s Career and Stories Following the procedure from best bridesmaid, nomination to announcement, the songs, . Swedish Academy announced Alice Munro to be the 2013 Nobel Laureate in bridesmaid speech, Literature in October. Different from the winners from recent years, Ms. Munro is famous for her literary short stories instead of works that are “difficult to comprehend or overtly political” (Bosman).
However, there is something unique about Alice Munro’s works that helped her win the Nobel. Alice Munro , Fiction , Nobel laureates 1133 Words | 3 Pages. The Apostle Paul Introduction This report paper will be on the life of backmasked, Paul . We will look at best bridesmaid many various different facts . about in india this influential man of God. Speech! We all know the apostle Paul was used of God in a miraculous way, but this paper will take a behind the scenes look at some areas. I also endeavor to make this paper come alive and reveal things about the apostle Paul that maybe have never been discovered by the average reader and possibly forgotten by literacy in india, the veteran Christian. The Author of. Apostle , Barnabas , Jesus 2341 Words | 7 Pages.
Paul Bernardo The urge shot through the mans body, uncontrollable, like sharks in a feeding frenzy. He could only quench his feverish . desires by carrying out unspeakable devilish acts. The victim didn't matter, no thought was given to any implications of the satanic rituals. Several times Bernardo resorted to defecating of best speech, human beings in order to satisfy his sick and abnormal urges. Paul Bernardo's lustful and diverted sexual desires sprouted from the influence of pornography.
Pornography. Human sexual behavior , Human sexuality , Karla Homolka 791 Words | 3 Pages. 8/2/2012 Many people believe that Paul is in fact the founder of Christianity, and not Jesus. Of the mr.chips novel, twenty seven documents that . constitute the New Testament, thirteen are letters attributed to Paul . Bridesmaid! Also, more than half of the Acts of the Essay Bixler's of Sudan, Apostles describes Paul’s conversion and subsequent activities on behalf of the spread of the good news about Jesus (the Gospel). Best Bridesmaid! This gives us an indication as to how important Paul was to the religion. Paul is one of the most prominent people in history.
Acts of the Apostles , Apostle , Conversion of in india, Paul 1891 Words | 5 Pages.
Cheap Custom Essay Papers - This Maid of Honor Speech will blow your mind! - YouTube - Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ
Nov 22, 2017 Best bridesmaid speech,
essay on catholic AN ESSAY ON CATHOLIC MARRIAGE. Rama Coomaraswamy, M.D. It is no accident, as the Socialists say, that Socialism and Sex (or free love) come in together as advanced ideas. They supplement each other. Russian dissident Igor Shafarevich, in his profound book The Socialist Phenomenon, explains that the best, Socialist project of homogenizing society demands that the family be vitiated or destroyed. This can be accomplished in good measure by Essay on Mark Bixler's Boys of Sudan, profaning conjugal love and breaking monogamy's link between Sex and loyalty.
Hence, in their missionary phases Socialist movements often stress sexual liberation, and members of radical organizations may impose mandatory promiscuity within the group, everyone sharing a bed with each of the others, each equally related to each. It is the ultimate in leveling. Few Americans will buy a bottle labeled Socialism. The cunning of the Socialist hive has consisted largely in its skill in piggybacking on speech the more attractive things. Like Sex. Now it is obvious that the Evil one, who from the beginning has wanted to poison and destroy the work of the Creator, will rage incessantly against these four - marriage, sexuality, love, procreation - for he hates everything about them. In all times and places it has been man's delight to think of human love as a type of divine Love and of human marriage as a type of the patriarchy, marriage of the soul with God Many marriages get into trouble.
The causes of this can be listed as the world, the best speech, flesh and on Mark Bixler's Boys of Sudan the devil. This old canard is not without meaning. The world imposes innumerable pressures on marriage both by its value system or rather, negative value system, and by the difficulties of earning an bridesmaid, adequate and victorian honorable living. Bridesmaid Speech? How often our children are mis-educated and our women forced to vs matriarchy work outside the home if the family is to best speech survive as an economic unit. The flesh relates to those problems that arise from on Mark The Lost of Sudan, within ourselves. A marital couple in conflict can truly be said to be at best speech war - one is reminded of St. Paul's question, whence come your wars? - they come from dracula: the impaler, your greeds and your lusts. And finally, there is the devil - or evil - which greatly delights in the destruction of marriage and the perversion of sex. There is much talk in Catholic literature of marriage, but very little of sex. Best Bridesmaid? Hence I shall try in what follows to deal with this delicate topic, as well as with love and marriage. Catholics are faced with a serious dilemma with regard to sex.
Brought up in an alien culture, bombarded with the distortions of the media, and strongly influenced by a scientific and biological educational background based on false philosophical and the impaler theological principles, they have increasingly tended to see sex only in its biological setting. In addition to such influences, they are also subjected to a variety of distorted opinions on the subject from supposedly traditional sources. What I hope to bridesmaid speech do in backmasked songs, what follows is present some insights into best, the Catholic view of sex based on documents drawn from the Church's Magisterium. In order to do this let us for a moment consider the nature of man - for sex must be placed within a given context. Unfortunately most of us have been influenced by evolutionary theory and hence we tend to see Natural Selection as a driving force in our lives. If man is only a higher form of animal, the product of natural evolution, then it logically follows that man's sexual and erotic life is seen in terms of an mr.chips novel, extension of animal instincts. The ultimate, positive basis of best bridesmaid, human eroticism becomes the biological purpose of the songs, species, usually seen in terms of best bridesmaid speech, survival. Not dissimilar to the purely biological point of view, is that which embraces the concept that sex is natural and that repressive cultural forces or religious attitudes have distorted our sexual lives.
According to this view, the only normal attitude towards sex is that of the uninhibited and amoral primitive savage - an opinion that refuses to recognize that even the most primitive of tribes in Africa and South America have strict rules with regard to sexual activity. This Rousseauian viewpoint is often embraced by patriarchy vs matriarchy, modern writers. Thus, for bridesmaid example, Aldous Huxley in Point Counter Point describes D.H. Lawrence's attitude in the following terms: the natural appetites and desires of men are not what makes them so bestial. It is the imagination, the intellect, the principles, the education, the tradition. Leave the instincts to themselves and they will do very little evil. The problem with both these viewpoints is that neither says anything about mr.chips novel love. Without love, sexuality becomes like the activities of the birds and the bees. Most philosophers hold that man is distinguished from the beast because of his ability to think and best will; similarly, most philosophers place love within the realm of the will.  For man to reduce sex to a natural or instinctive act, or to use the words of Lawrence, to blood and literacy in india flesh, can only signify degradation, for what is called natural for man as man is not at best all the same as what the term natural signifies in patriarchy, the case of best, animals. This does not mean that sex for patriarchy man is bridesmaid speech, not natural, but rather that, like all his acts, both his intellect and will to some degree are involved.
Clearly man shares certain instincts with animals - but a man is not said to act in an animal manner unless he refuses to use his higher powers to modify his instinctual drives. Novelists? (The reader is referred to the essay on Psychological Integration and bridesmaid the Religious Outlook in this collection.) Conformity is natural when it is conformity to one's own type. Victorian Novelists? A horse would not be seen as natural if he ran like a rabbit, and vice versa. What is normal to speech man must take into consideration the fact that he is placed at the apex of God's creation and Essay on Mark Bixler's The Lost Boys of Sudan made in the image of best bridesmaid speech, God. For him to act in a manner that refuses recognition to his stature is for mr.chips novel him to act unnaturally. Proof for this contention can be found in the fact that the speech, false notion of sexual love as a physical need.
As Julius Evola points out, A physical sexual desire never exists in backmasked, man; the desire of man is best speech, substantially always psychic, and his physical desire is only a translation and transposition of psychic desire. Only in the most primitive individual does the circuit close so fast that only the terminal fact of the process is present in their conscious as a sharp, driving carnal lust unmistakably linked to victorian physiological conditional qualities which take the foremost place in animal sexuality.  Nor can it be claimed that human sex is speech, driven by an instinct for reproduction. As one wit put it, when Adam awoke next to Eve, he did not cry out and say 'behold the mother of my children.' I have said that the problem of the biological or Rousseauian viewpoints is that while they speak of the emotions, they say nothing of love. Now, despite innumerable attempts to define the nature of love, none of them have been wholly successful.
This is Essay, not surprising in bridesmaid, that there is something mysterious about this affliction. However, I believe there are certain characteristics - perhaps one could say symptoms that are fairly universally recognized. Love by its very nature seems to 1) involve the whole being. No one ever claimed to love another other than with their whole body, soul, and patriarchy spirit. 2) love demands or longs for eternity. A person truly in love wants to bind himself forever to his beloved. 3) love sees in the beloved, not his or her faults, but rather his or her perfections. The very names of endearment speak to this, for the beloved is an speech, angel if not a god or goddess; he or she embodies - or at least potentially embodies - all the qualities of the divine prototype - the solar hero, the flawless maiden. 4) both parties to the loving relationship see their worldly, if not their eternal happiness to lie in the perpetual enjoyment of each other's company. 5) love requires an act of the will - a commitment - directed towards what is understood as desirable - an act of the will which also excludes anything that intrudes upon the unity of the parties involved.
To say this is not to exclude the emotions, for as has been pointed out above, the act of patriarchy, loving involves the whole of what one is. It follows then that one who refuses to commit himself, or who breaks a commitment in order to start another relationship, fools himself. Such a person confuses the excitement of novelty with authentic happiness.  What role does marriage play in all this? Borrowing from von Hildebrand, marriage is the best, friend and protector of Essay Bixler's The Lost of Sudan, love. Marriage gives love the structure and shelteredness, the climate in which alone it can grow.
Marriage teaches spouses humility and bridesmaid speech makes them realize that the human person is a very poor lover. Much as we long to Bixler's The Lost love and to be loved, we repeatedly fall short and desperately need help. We must bind ourselves through sacred vows so that the bridesmaid speech, bond will grant our love the strength necessary to face the tempest-tossed sea of our human condition. Marriage, because it implies will, commitment, duty, and responsibility, braces spouses to fight to save the precious gift of their love. Almost all cultures initiate and establish marriage with religious rites. For those that believe in God, knowing how difficult marriage can be when we lose sight of the inner essence of the beloved and see only in india, his or her outer accidental qualities, realizing that they have made a commitment or a vow made to best God, and asking a higher power to patriarchy succor their weakness, becomes an inestimable source of strength; a means of renewing their commitment and of assuming their responsibilities which not infrequently take on the form of a cross. Marriages involve commitments in illness and in health, for better or for worse.
Religions tend to view marriage as a contract.  This in no way is meant to exclude love, regardless of whether that love has led to the marriage, or the best speech, arranged marriage has opened the door to love. This is victorian novelists, not only because every commitment has a contractual aspect to it, but also because religions tend to see marriage in a broader context - that of society as a whole, and therefore as directed towards what philosophers call the common good. Whereas modern social theory tends to view each individual as tied to the state, traditional societies tend to see the family as the bridesmaid speech, basic building block of society. Mr.chips Novel? The very word economia means family, and best bridesmaid so it is that both religion and songs traditionally minded governments do everything possible to maintain and foster the integrity of the family. If marriage is a contract, it is not a contract in the ordinary sense of the word. It is not a contract in best speech, which man's subsidiary goods - his house or property - are transferred, but one in which it is his and her very person which is transferred. On Mark Boys? No man or woman has the bridesmaid speech, right to say of another that you are mine. Two beings alone can say this to one another because they have truly and freely given themselves to one another.
What is exchanged is their will and consent, and this, unlike any other contract, irrevocably. Literacy In India? This is speech, bone of my bones and flesh of backmasked songs, my flesh. Best Speech? what God has joined together let no man put asunder. And subsequent to this proclamation God instructs the vs matriarchy, couple to increase and multiply. To speak of family is to speak of progeny. Best Bridesmaid Speech?  Now there is no question but that, as St. Victorian Novelists? Augustine says, the sanctity of the sacrament is more important than the fecundity of the womb.  Yet, the best speech, childless family always bears a tragic aspect. Songs? No wonder then that most religions agree with the Catholic principle that the best, primary purpose of marriage is the victorian novelists, procreation and education of children, and the secondary purpose of marriage is the fostering of the unitive relationship of the parties involved. Best?  Let us be clear on what the mr.chips novel, procreation and education of children means. It does not mean that one should have as many children as possible, but rather that in a marriage the children come first - not just their production, but their upbringing. Further, by speech, education one does not necessarily mean a Harvard degree, but rather the formation and development of complete human beings; individuals whose physical, psychic and spiritual development is patriarchy, fostered. What this means is that, should love grow cold and the unitive aspect of marriage fall apart, the best bridesmaid speech, parents are obliged to sacrifice their personal needs - their desires to love and be loved - for the sake of the children. Essay On Mark The Lost? This may seem to us to be a painful course to follow. But, as St.
Seraphim of Sarov points out: Christian marriage is a life-work. Best Bridesmaid Speech? It is easy only in patriarchy, ideal circumstances. Fidelity to the end, St. Seraphim taught, is essential to happiness. If Christians find they cannot live together, they go on living together for their homes, their children, for the Church and for God.
It may mean much suffering, but this married life is the way to heaven. For only those who take up the cross can follow Christ.  All of us are familiar with the arguments against remaining married when the best, interpersonal relationship breaks down. Always rooted in this breakdown is self-will or selfishness. (If as discussed below, the wife is obedient and the husband an alter Christus , there is no real possibility of divorce.) Even apart from the spiritual effects on the partners, one must consider the devastating effects of divorce on mr.chips novel children. Bridesmaid? One has only to consider the studies of Wallerstein to see the mr.chips novel, long term effects. And so it is that religions either forbid divorce, or make it extremely difficult to obtain. Obtaining a Gett in Judaism is, I am told, almost impossible.
In Islam where divorce is allowed, there is a Hadith or teaching of Mohammed to the effect that God hates nothing more than divorce. Among Hindus, divorce is forbidden in bridesmaid, the higher castes, though allowed for novelists the untouchables, who are those considered outside the best bridesmaid, pale of religion and hence those not held to high moral values. Mr.chips Novel? Before we raise objections to the concept of untouchables, let me remind you that from the orthodox Hindu point of view, those that are not born and do not live in accord with Hindu moral principles are all untouchables. But the religious outlook on marriage is by no means limited to strengthening its contractual character or safeguarding its social or unitive purpose. Orthodox religion places marriage in the overall context of what, for lack of a better word, I will call salvation. Religion desires for all men and women, regardless of their state of life, sanctity and best bridesmaid speech ultimately the beatific vision. Bixler's Boys? Morality is best speech, not an end in patriarchy vs matriarchy, itself, but only predispositive to the sanctified life. And with this in view it encourages each and best every person to love Truth, Beauty and Goodness, the essential qualities and names of God. It sees human love as a reflection of divine love and human marriage macroscosmically as a reflection of the relationship between the soul and God; microscosmically as the relationship between what spiritual writers have called the lesser self and dracula: the greater Self or spiritual center of best, our being. This moral and spiritual outlook is patriarchy, clearly stated by St. Paul in Ephesians, Chapter V. After stressing the need to live a life dedicated to their sanctification, Paul instructs the partners in marriage to be subject to one another, in the fear of Christ.
He continues: Let women be subject to their husbands as to the Lord: Because the husband is the head of the wife as Christ is the head of the church. He is the savior of his body. Therefore as the church is subject to Christ, so also let the wives be to bridesmaid speech their husbands in all things. Husbands, love your wives as Christ also loved the church, and delivered himself up for mr.chips novel it, That he might sanctify it, cleansing it by the laver of water in the word of best, life. so also ought men to love their wives as their own bodies.
For this cause shall a man leave his father and mother, and shall cleave to his wife, and they shall be two in one flesh. This is Essay Bixler's of Sudan, a great sacrament.  This is by no means the only place where Scripture teaches the hierarchical nature of marriage. Leaving apart the passage in Genesis II:24 and innumerable examples of the relationship of men and women in the Old Testament, let us turn to the new dispensation. In the First Letter to best the Corinthians Paul treats of abuses in divine worship in this manner: But, I would have you know, that the head of every man is Christ; and the impaler the head of the woman is the man; and the head of Christ is God. Every man praying or prophesying with his head covered, disgraceth his head. But every woman praying or prophesying with her head not covered, disgraceth her head. The man indeed ought not to cover his head, because he is the image and glory of God; but the woman is the glory of the man. For the man is not of the woman, but the best, woman of the man. For the man was not created for backmasked the woman, but the woman for the man. Therefore ought the speech, woman to have a cover over her head, because of the angels (XI: 3-10).
The Apostle Paul here confirms again the Essay Bixler's The Lost of Sudan, teaching of the submission of the woman to the man. He holds this submission to be important, and under the inspiration of the Holy Ghost, institutes a sign of recognition for bridesmaid speech this submission. The woman should cover her head during worship services, so as to honor her head, that is to say, her husband. A little later in the same Epistle St. Paul writes again on the subject of divine worship: Let women keep silence in the churches; for novelists it is not permitted them to speak, but to be subject, as also the [old] law saith. But if they would learn any thing, let them ask their husbands at home. For it is a shame for a woman to speak in the church. If any seem to be a prophet, or spiritual, let him know the things that I write to you, that they are commandments of the Lord (XIV:35). This law of the Lord is addressed above all to women, who should keep silent during divine worship. And from this we have to conclude that liturgical functions, such as lector or priest, are forbidden to them according to divine law. To consider that the submission of the wife to her husband is an order from God appears to us to be a proximate notion.
For the law states that they ought to be subject not only in Church, but everywhere, as for example in best bridesmaid, the family. St. Paul is only drawing out the consequences of Essay on Mark Bixler's Boys, this principle. This law, which should not only be applied to Jews, but also to Christians, is part of the natural law. The submission of the wife in the order of natural law is demanded in marriage and in best bridesmaid speech, divine worship, but also by literacy, Christ from whom the Apostle conveys this Revelation. Not to accept the Apostle's views is to question the dogma which teaches that every book of the Bible is inspired by the Holy Spirit. The Apostle Paul also confirms his teaching on the submission of the wife to her husband in his Epistle to Timothy (II: 9-15). It would be erroneous to assert that this teaching is speech, exceptional and only presented by St. Paul. St. Peter has stated it in similar terms: In like manner also, let wives be subject to literacy their husbands (I Pet.
III:1). Thus the Apostles Peter and Paul conjointly attest to the veracity of bridesmaid, this doctrine. The position taken by the popes on the question as to who is head of the family is likewise very clear. Leo XIII's Encyclical Arcanum divinae sapientiae states: The husband is the chief of the family and backmasked the head of the wife. The woman, because she is flesh of his flesh, and bone of his bone, must be subject to her husband and obey him; not, indeed, as a servant, but as a companion, so that her obedience shall be wanting in neither honor nor dignity.
Since the best bridesmaid, husband represents Christ, and since the wife represents the Church, let there always be, both in him who commands and in her who obeys, a heaven-born love guiding both of their respective duties. Pius XI was also strongly attached to this principle. In India? In his famous Encyclical on marriage, Casti connubii , he states: domestic society being confirmed therefore, by this bond of love, there should flourish in it that 'order of love,' as St. Augustine calls it. This order includes both the primacy of the husband with regard to the wife and her willing obedience, which the Apostle commands in these words: 'Let women be subject to their husbands as to the Lord, because the best bridesmaid, husband is head of the wife and Christ is head of the Church'. This subjection, however, does not deny or take away the liberty which fully belongs to victorian the woman both in bridesmaid speech, view of her dignity as a human person, and in view of her most noble office as wife and mother and companion; nor does it bid her obey her husband's every request if not in harmony with right reason or with the dignity of a wife; nor, in fine, does it imply that the wife should be put on the level with persons who in law are called minors, to whom it is customary not to allow free exercise of their rights on account of their lack of mature judgment, or of their ignorance of victorian novelists, human affairs. But it forbids that exaggerated liberty which cares not for the good of the bridesmaid speech, family; it forbids that in mr.chips novel, this body which is the family, the heart be separated from the head to the great detriment of the whole body and the proximate danger of best, ruin. For if the man is the head, the woman is the heart, and he occupies the chief place in victorian novelists, ruling, so she may and ought to claim for herself the chief place in love. Again, this subjection of bridesmaid speech, wife to husband in its degrees and manner may vary according to backmasked songs the different conditions of persons, place and time. Best? In fact, if the husband neglects his duty, it falls to the wife to take his place in directing the family. Patriarchy Vs Matriarchy? But the structure of the family and its fundamental law, established and confirmed by God, must always and everywhere be maintained intact.
I have reproduced this passage in its entirety because Pius XI comes to an important conclusion, the content of which is the basis for the document: the submission of woman to man is the fundamental law of the family established and fixed by speech, God. Pope Pius XII reiterated this principle and once again made it clear that the family had been willed by God to have a head. This head has authority over dracula: the impaler, the one who has been given to be his companion. and over those who, when the Lord gives his blessing, will be multiplied and rejoice like the luxuriant shoots of an olive tree. Speech? When asked whether or not this teaching was still relevant for modern families he responded: We indeed know that, just as equality in studies at school, in the sciences, sports and other competitions, gives rise to dracula: the impaler sentiments of pride in the hearts of many women. All about best bridesmaid you many voices will portray this subjection as something unjust; they will suggest to you a prouder independence. Be on your guard against these words of the serpent, of temptation and of lies: do not become other Eves, do not turn away from the only road which can lead you, even from the here and now, to true happiness. One last quote taken from Scripture: authority as head of the Essay The Lost Boys of Sudan, family comes from speech, God, as formerly God had accorded power and authority to Adam, the head of all mankind; Adam should have transmitted all these gifts to his descendants. For Adam was formed first, then Eve. And Adam was not seduced; but the woman being seduced. Backmasked? fell into disobedience (I Tim., II:13-14) . We will see later that marriage must be entered into with the proper intentions.
At least one Catholic theologian has opinioned that the acceptance of a hierarchical relationship in marriage is requisite for the intention to be proper. According to Moersdorf, a marriage is realized through uniformity of the will of both people. Both parties to the marriage have to be in best speech, agreement in order to affirm the essential content of the marriage contract, which is to say the one who wishes to patriarchy vs matriarchy conclude a marriage must be ready to accept the three characteristics of marriage. These are the right to best the body, the indissolubility of marriage and the unity of marriage. The unity of marriage signifies, according to this author, the union of one man with one woman, and therefore a single couple, and that the man and women be united in a hierarchical order by a holy unity. According to Moersdorf, for the realization of a valid marriage, it is indispensable that the contracting parties recognize and fulfill these conditions. If the necessary understanding and will for the impaler the conclusion of a marriage are seriously lacking, the marriage will not be valid.  Obedience and the acceptance of a hierarchy of authority are difficult for moderns to bear with.  How are such concepts compatible with the principles of freedom equality and brotherhood?  Well clearly they are not. But before wives get too upset about the need to obey - a Fiat reflective of that made by the Blessed Virgin, and implicitly one made by the Church, let us consider the far heavier obligation on the husband - namely that he love the wife as Christ loves His Church.  Note here the seemingly double command - to best speech be alter Christus or another Christ and to love as Christ loves. Now such is no easy task, and what woman would not want to mr.chips novel be married to best bridesmaid speech such a man? Even God has limits, for He cannot be other than what He is - He cannot be other than love.
And there is yet another mystery involved - one that becomes present when the marriage is blessed with children. Consider how it is that God is called Father, the priest is called father and is truly father to the community; and finally, the vs matriarchy, head of the family is also called father - for all three share in authority, in procreativity, and in love. Bridesmaid? I will speak in the following passages of procreativity, because, just as the fruit of God's love is patriarchy, his creation, so also the best, fruit of the couple's love is fecund, not apart from God, but because the couple participate in God's creativity. Custom recognizes this in the practice of the husband carrying the wife over literacy, the lintel into their future home. The husband is a psychopomp - a guide of souls to the other world. The lintel or door through which the wife is carried represents an entrance into that state of best bridesmaid, unity where the two are joined in one flesh.
In this relationship the husband bears a spiritual as well as a material responsibility for mr.chips novel his wife and offspring - one he will ultimately have to answer to best speech God for. Marriage is ultimately a rather serious affair. The acceptance of these principles makes Marriage a spiritual path. St. Alphonsus Liguori clearly states that for someone called to vs matriarchy the state of marriage to become a priest is to risk damning his soul - he says the same with regard to someone called to the priesthood entering marriage. Best Bridesmaid Speech?  Let me stress the word called. This in dracula: the impaler, Latin translates as vocation. Unfortunately, we have become accustomed to exclusively applying this term to the religious life. But such is not the speech, attitude of the saints.
St. Francis de Sales once exclaimed O how agreeable to God are the virtues of a married woman, for they must be strong and excellent to survive this vocation.  Similarly, Pope Pius XII spoke to newlyweds on May 3, 1939, telling them that it was their vocation to found a home and that this what God had asked of them. Actually, the backmasked songs, concept of vocation is bridesmaid speech, broader than at the impaler first would appear to be the case - or rather, it is a concept that can be understood on best bridesmaid speech many levels. We all have a vocation to sanctity, regardless of our state in life. And similarly, the professions we engage in - providing they are legitimate - are also vocations. Thus medicine and law are also seen as callings. Vocations are of course, a means to an end, and thus ultimately they are a means of backmasked songs, sanctification, for sanctification is the true goal which God wishes for all of us. Best? As St.
Therese of Liseaux wrote to Bixler's The Lost Mme. Best Speech? Pottier, a married woman with children: So for both of vs matriarchy, us the blest days of our childhood are over! We are now in the serious stage of life; we are following very different roads, but the end is the same. Best Speech? Each of us must have but one same purpose, to sanctify ourselves in the road that God has marked out for us.  Vocations can be seen as existing on several levels of reference - for example, one's state in life, and one's means of patriarchy vs matriarchy, making a living. Strictly speaking, we should all be artists and make our livings by some craft. The craftsman makes useful objects - consider the stone mason who, parallel with his work fashions his soul in view to uniting it with God. How sad that in our day, most of us are denied the opportunity to bridesmaid speech follow a craft. By practicing one's vocation, one practices the virtues, or more precisely, one eliminates the backmasked songs, vices which are their opposite.  The obligation to sanctity falls upon all of us.
When some of the laity protested to St. John Chrysostom that they were not monks, he responded that all the precepts of the speech, Law apply equally to monks and to the laity, with the exception of one, celibacy.  And who of us can dare to proclaim that the sexual act precludes the possibility of sanctity, especially when this act in its proper setting, as will be shown, is a reflection of the true relationship between God and the soul. The Impaler? To speak of vocations however is not to say they are all of equal stature. Just as a loving father provides each of his children with what is necessary for their proper development, so also does Our Lord provide each of us with a vocation suitable to our needs and abilities. A surgeon is a higher calling than that of a plumber - though both can perfect their souls by best bridesmaid speech, the manner in which they practice their calling. And so it is backmasked, that the best bridesmaid speech, religious life in The Lost Boys, which the best speech, individual is married to Christ, is on Mark of Sudan, a higher calling than the married state. Best Speech?  We of course know that there have been many married saints. St. Marcarius and songs St.
Anthony of the Desert both sent postulants to learn from people in the married state. Unfortunately however, many authors writing about married saints convey to us the message that such individuals were saints, not because they fulfilled the obligations of the married state with heroic virtue, but rather, despite the fact that they were married. Sometimes, when I look at the clergy and know that some priests have been canonized, I am inclined to suspect that their sanctity was also achieved despite their vocations. But such is best bridesmaid speech, equally absurd. Allow me to string together a few quotations from St. Francis de Sales addressed to women in the married state: You must not only be devout, and love devotion, but you must make it amiable, useful, and agreeable to everyone one. The sick will love your devotion if they are charitably consoled by it; your family will love it if they find you more careful of their good, more gentle in mr.chips novel, little accidents that happen, more kind in correcting, and so on; your husband, if he sees that as your devotion increases you are more devoted to his regard, and sweet in your love to bridesmaid him; your parents and friends if they perceive in vs matriarchy, you more generosity, tolerance and condescension towards their wills, when not against the will of God. In short, you must as far as possible, make your devotion attractive. Oh my daughter, how agreeable to God are the virtues of a married woman, for they must be strong and excellent to last in that vocation. Take particular pains to do all you can to acquire sweetness amongst your people.
I mean in your household. I do not say that you must be soft and remiss, but gentle and sweet. My God, how holy, my dear daughter, and how agreeable to God we would be if we knew how to use properly the subjects of speech, mortification which our vocation affords; for they are without doubt greater than among religious; the evil is that we do not make them useful as they do. And of married people he directed, he said: O my God, what grand souls have I found here in the servitude of God. the state of marriage is one which requires more virtue and constancy than any other; it is novelists, a perpetual exercise of mortification. He adds an important caveat which we must all take to heart: And what is it that makes [the commandments of the vocation of marriage] burdensome to you? Nothing in truth save your own will which desires to reign in you at any cost. a person who has not the fever of self-will is satisfied with everything, provided that God is served.ADVANCE u 3  St. Lewis of Granada mentions yet another caveat which all of us should keep in mind. He tells us let the married woman look to the government of her house, and take care of her family, please her husband, and do all that a wife should do; when she has satisfied these obligations let her spend the best, rest of her time in devotion as much as she pleases, but still, let her remember, that the duties of mr.chips novel, her state call her first.
Lest you think I am picking on the women, I shall add the speech, rest of the passage: let those that are fathers of children frequently reflect upon the severe punishment that was inflicted upon mr.chips novel, Heli for his neglect in best bridesmaid, chastising and instructing his sons (I Kings, IV). Consider the sins of the children are, in some manner, imputed to vs matriarchy the fathers, and that the ruin of a son is very often the best speech, cause of the father's destruction; nor does he deserve the bare name of father who after having begotten his son for this world, does not also beget him for the next.  The passage from St. Paul quoted above provides us with the fundamental outline of the spiritual life. Consider the statement in Genesis to mr.chips novel the effect that Adam was made in the image and likeness of God. Why this double description? Why should Scripture be so redundant? Thanks to the expositions of the Church fathers this passage becomes clearer.
Adam was indeed made in bridesmaid speech, the image and likeness of God. But when he fell, he lost that likeness while retaining the image. Now we are, as St. Bernard tells us, incapable of losing that image, but like the fallen Adam, we have lost the likeness. The entire spiritual life is aimed at regaining that likeness. It is in india, only when we achieve this that we can say with St. Paul, I live not I, but Christ within me.
It is only when this state is achieved that both priest and father can truly - that is fully - love. And if the wife in obeying her husband, obeys Christ; the husband, like any true king, can only rule by divine right, - that is by commanding what Christ would command. When the bridesmaid speech, king, priest or husband commands other than by divine right - which is to say, enforces laws or rules that are not divine in nature - when he commands what he wants apart from or in opposition to backmasked the divine laws, he becomes a despot. The husband in the family may rule by divine right, but never by speech, his own right. By extension, the family is patriarchy vs matriarchy, modeled after that established by St. Best Bridesmaid? Joseph and the Blessed Virgin - our homes should aim at being another Nazareth. The human being as individual is also a hierarchy in which the higher powers should have authority over victorian, the lower ones. Consider the Lord's prayer.
Thy Kingdom come, on earth as it is in heaven. That heaven is described as a hierarchical structure is not a historical accident. Nor is it a manifestation of St. Best? Paul's or ancient Jewish misogyny. Christ is our King - both priest and King, and we pay him homage as do the innumerable choirs of angels. Mr.chips Novel? Now the best, saints tell us that this phrase of the Lord's Prayer is one which request this hierarchical relationship to come down in our society, in our families and convents, and above all in our own hearts. It is patriarchy vs matriarchy, this hierarchical relationship which explains the statement of several saints to the effect that all creation is feminine in relation to God.  On the microcosmic level - on the level of each of our lives, we are constantly faced with a need to choose between centering our actions and bridesmaid our being - if such were possible, on our little selves or egos, or on God which dwells within us. This is the Essay on Mark Bixler's of Sudan, battle against self love - or if you prefer, selfishness. It is not God - the Holy Spirit - that imago dwelling within our hearts that is selfish, hurt, angry, resentful or unforgiving - but rather our egos, our little selves.
We are constantly at war or as the bridesmaid, psychiatrists would put it, in conflict with ourselves. And thus it is that we say to the unruly child or adult, get hold of Essay on Mark Bixler's The Lost Boys, yourself. St. Speech? Paul describes this well when he says I see another law in my members, repugnant to dracula: the laws of speech, my mind, and capturing me in the law of patriarchy vs matriarchy, sin that is in my members (Rom. Best Bridesmaid? VII:25).  Some exegetes would infer that this statement refers exclusively to a sexual conflict, but reference to songs other parts of Scripture make it clear that by members - note the plural - the bridesmaid speech, sacred writers are referring to all the vs matriarchy, passions that afflict our souls - thus St. James tells us that the tongue is set among our members which defileth the whole body. (James III, 5,6) It is important then to realize that there are a series of hierarchies involved. There is best speech, God and mr.chips novel his bride the Church; There is the husband and his bride or wife, and there is the Spirit of God that dwells within us, and our psycho-physical nature. Best Bridesmaid Speech? In each of these there is a hierarchy to which we must conform ourselves. These three hierarchies are intimately entwined.  Consider the following exposition of the Parable of the woman by the well to whom Christ offered the mr.chips novel, water of eternal life. When the best, woman asked for this water Christ told her to call her husband.
John Scotus Erigina explains the mystical meaning of this parable: The woman is the rational soul [ anima ], whose husband [literally vir or 'man' (with the Essay on Mark Bixler's The Lost of Sudan, connotation of 'active power') not maritus or conjunx ] is understood to be the animus, which is variously named now intellect [ intellectus ], now mind [ mens ], now animus and often even spirit [spiritus]. This is the bridesmaid, husband of whom the literacy, Apostle speaks the bridesmaid speech, head of the woman is the man, the literacy, head of the man is Christ, the head of Christ is God. I other words, the head of the anima is the intellectus , and the head of the intellectus is best speech, Christ. Such is the natural order of the human creature.
The soul must be submitted to the rule of the mind, the in india, mind to Christ, and thereby the whole being is submitted through Christ to God the Father. Spirit revolves perpetually about God and is therefore well named the best bridesmaid speech, husband and guide of the other parts of the soul, since between it and its creator no creature is interposed. Reason in turn revolves around the knowledge and causes of created things, and whatever spirit receives through eternal contemplation it transmits to reason and reason commends to memory. The third part of the soul is mr.chips novel, interior sense, which is subordinate to reason as the faculty which is superior to speech it, and by means of reason is also subordinate to spirit. Finally, below the interior sense in mr.chips novel, the natural order is the exterior sense, through which the whole soul nourishes and rules the fivefold bodily senses and animates the whole body.
Since, therefore, reason can receive nothing of the gifts from on bridesmaid speech high unless through her husband, the spirit, which holds the chief place of backmasked, all nature, the woman or anima is rightly ordered to call her husband or intellectus with whom and by whom she may drink spiritual gifts and withoutwhom she may in no wise participate in speech, gifts from on high. For this reason Jesus says to her, 'Call your husband, come hither.' Do not have the presumption to come to me without your husband. For, if the intellect is absent, one may not ascend to mr.chips novel the heights of theology, nor participate in spiritual gifts.  It is in the light of such understanding that the theologians have said that all creation is feminine to God.  Yet another way of envisioning the best bridesmaid speech, relationship between man and women is to recognize that man manifests his Christic nature as Warrior (Hero, King) and as Ascetic (Priest), which is to say, in the realms of Action and Contemplation. (Christ is both King and Priest). The woman realizes herself, raises herself to the level of the in india, man as Ascetic or as Warrior, insofar as she is either Lover or Mother.
In the words of Evola, as there is an active heroism, so also there is a negative heroism - they are the two sides of one and the same ideal; there is the heroism of absolute affirmation and bridesmaid that of absolute dedication, and the one can be as luminous as the other. Literacy In India? It is these differentiations of the best bridesmaid, heroic concept that determine the distinctive characteristics of the ways proper to victorian men and to woman thought of as types. To the act of the warrior and bridesmaid the ascetic, accomplished in the one case by pure action and in the other by detachment, whereby these are established in a life beyond mere living, there corresponds in the woman the heroism of total self-surrender to another being, of existence altogether for the sake of another being - whether a beloved man (if she is a Lover) or a child (if she is a Mother) - in mr.chips novel, which she finds the meaning of her own life, her own delight and her own justification.  We are all aware of best, how love can be a transforming experience - even the love of a child for a dog - and certainly the love of one human being for another. In a moment, as C. S. Lewis has pointed out, love has made appetite itself altruistic, tossed personal happiness aside as a triviality, and placed the interests of another in the center of our own being. At one bound, it has leaped over Bixler's The Lost of Sudan, the high wall of our selfhood. We find ourselves as regards the other person really fulfilling the law, really loving another as ourselves. But having done this, the mere falling in love will do no more. Eros has done his stuff. He will not extend this selflessness to best bridesmaid others beside the beloved. Literacy In India? He may do quite the opposite.
He will not even perpetuate it towards her. He will not of himself remain in bridesmaid, that relationship and continue to be the sort of lover he promised to be. He may not remain any sort of lover at all. He may simply die. For of course, as we all really know, mere spontaneous feeling will not keep any pair in mr.chips novel, love even for a few months or weeks. Bridesmaid Speech? The passion in its total and selfless commitment is intermittent and recurrent. The old self, as after a religious conversion, soon turns out not to be so dead as it seemed. In both the old self may for a moment be knocked flat, but it will soon be up again, if not on his feet, at least on his elbow. If not roaring, at least back to victorian novelists his old surly grumbling or mendicant whine.
The corruptions return. Venus may sometimes slip back into mere sexuality, but what is ten times worse, that desire for speech the beloved, for total unity, may take on a morbid form. It may come to be a sort of imperialism, a desire for absorbing without being absorbed, possessing without being possessed, making the beloved's every thought, wish and songs interest, a mere reflection of oneself. And since the best, beloved may often have exactly the same program for you, success, which would be infamous if achieved, is not very probable. At this stage the couple are almost fortunate if they fall out of love altogether, but they may remain in it, in that sort of in india, love which is increasingly a sort of hatred. jealous, exacting and resentful. C.S. Lewis continues: My point is speech, not that these dangers cannot be averted. They are averted daily by thousands of couples, but they are not averted by Eros - by love - itself.
If love is to remain, it must be supported by outside help. You need a firm will to justice, you need a will already pretty well formed or disciplined. In the long run you need the grace of Bixler's The Lost, God. Its rather like a garden. A garden is a glorious thing, full of life, and giving us life.
But you must not trust your garden to weed itself or fence itself, or prune itself, or anything of speech, that sort. It hasn't got that kind of dracula:, goodness. A garden left to nature will soon not be a garden. It is the same with our passions. Best Speech? They also are life giving. But when God planted that garden, he placed a man over it to patriarchy vs matriarchy dress it and set the man under Himself.  For most of us, being in bridesmaid speech, love is often the best experience of on Mark Bixler's The Lost Boys of Sudan, our lives, precisely because the best bridesmaid speech, state excludes vileness and involves a surpassing of our lesser selves. Patriarchy Vs Matriarchy? Unfortunately our egos rapidly come to the fore and the relationship becomes riddled with habit and triviality.
Retaining a sense of the mystery in best speech, marriage requires both nobility and a sense of the sacred. As another author has said, a profane man may look back on mr.chips novel his youthful love and think that now he is 'beyond' such 'illusions of youth'; but in fact it is he who has succumbed to the illusion and triviality of profane life, whereas in his youth he tasted something of greatness and nobility which he ought to have tried to maintain by leading a spiritual life. Man cannot easily escape the best, temptation to literacy humanize the sacred rather than sacralize the human. Plato uses many words that we have translated as love. There is storge , best translated as domestic love; there is filia , translated as friendship; there is Eros , or human love, there is Agape , often translated as selfless love, or charity; and there is epithumia which is lust. In the best bridesmaid, Symposium Plato calls Eros a mighty daemon. Mr.chips Novel? being an best, intermediate between the nature of a god and the nature of a mortal. Songs? That Eros should have two sides results from the fact that Aphrodite, the goddess of love, has two aspects, labeled Aphrodite Urania and Aphrodite Pandemia. The first embodies love of a divine nature; the second profane love.  Now marriage as a vocation or way to perfect one's soul requires precisely the commitment and fight not to let the best, first kind deteriorate into the second.
It involves the constant choice of love over selfishness, of giving over taking. Despite its joys, marriage is a life of continuing sacrifice - of destroying the old man that the new man might live.  Any father who faces the dracula:, daily task of speech, earning a living will be acquainted with sacrifice; as indeed, any woman who gets up in mr.chips novel, the middle of the night after a long day, to breast feed her child. To live in the married state without anger, impatience, resentment, selfishness is extremely difficult - witness the fact that marriages end up in divorce in over 60% of cases and beyond this, even those where the partners stay together, true love not infrequently dies. Lets face it: divorce is the result of selfishness on one or both partners sides. Marriage is a great sacrament. Best Bridesmaid Speech? Notice that we are not taught that there is a sacrament in marriage, but that marriage itself is a sacrament.
As the Council of Essay on Mark The Lost Boys, Trent taught, it is a grace which perfects natural love, strengthens the union into an absolute indissolubility, and sanctifies the persons married. Grace, you will remember from your catechism, perfects nature. Without the best speech, sacramental graces, it is novelists, a wonder that any marriage survives. Best Speech? With sacramental grace every aspect of dracula: the impaler, marriage can be sanctifying. Plato speaks of the androgyne - the time when man and woman were united or joined together. They decided however that they would attack the gods and Zeus in speech, his anger split them apart. Now the understanding of Greek mythology is not easy. This mythological story drawn from Aristophanes may well relate to a time before the fall with the female soul was united to the male image of Essay on Mark Bixler's of Sudan, God or the divine indwelling. This unity was lost with the fall. And the attraction towards the partner which is said to have resulted from this division - the best bridesmaid speech, seeking of wholeness, is but another way of describing the desire of the psyche-soul to be united with the indwelling spirit.
Ultimately Eros or human love must be transformed into Agape, divine love or Charity. The risk is that it will degenerate into mere passion or worse. While in the realm of songs, mythology it is worth considering the bridesmaid speech, story of St. George and the dragon and a host of variations in on Mark Bixler's Boys, which the loathly princess is kissed by the solar hero and restored to her rightful place. St. George slays the dragon, thus liberating the princess. Snow white, poisoned by the apple, is cured by the kiss of the prince. We are all in need of this kiss which derives from slaying the dragon of self-love.
Some of you will remember the novel 1984 which describes the bridesmaid speech, new socialist world of future. The story speaks of the reverse possibility. Mr.chips Novel? In it a couple make the terrible mistake of falling in love. The state has no objection to their having sexual relations - the children of course to be brought up by the state. However, having fallen in love the couple proffer their loyalty to each other. Bridesmaid Speech? This the state cannot tolerate. In order to correct their errors they are separately tortured. The inquisitor declares himself successful when the individuals concerned come to the point of mr.chips novel, wishing the best bridesmaid, suffering on their partner rather than desiring to suffer the torture for the sake of the partner.
I have many Catholic patients come to me as a psychiatrist who complain of having a poor self image. How is this possible if we are made in the image of literacy in india, Christ. It is only possible if we ignore this truth and center ourselves in our egos or little selves. Best Bridesmaid? And this brings me back to Essay of Sudan one of the most horrible confusions imposed upon the Catholic faithful by Vatican II. I say horrible because it fosters and approves the satisfying of best, this little self. You will immediately think of the heresy of religious liberty - and indeed in mr.chips novel, a sense you are correct. For the concept of religious liberty fundamentally teaches that we - our little selves - are the source of best, truth. This, incidentally, according to the Jewish fathers, is the worst form of mr.chips novel, idolatry.
However, the heresy I am referring to is one which affects us, if possible, even more directly, for it enters into and influences our married vocation from the moment of its inception until death do us part.. It is the heresy about the ends of marriage. The traditional teaching regarding the ends of marriage is encapsulated in Canon 1013 of the Code of Canon Law (1917). Vatican II declared that both ends are of equal value, but reversed the order in which they are stated. Best? It further declared that the priest was obliged to make reference to dracula: the impaler this in his sermon and best admonition at the marriage ceremony.  he traditional teaching states:
The primary end of Marriage is the procreation and education of offspring, while its secondary purposes are mutual help and allaying (also translated as a remedy for) concupiscence. The latter are entirely subordinate to the former. Pius XII commented on this in a clear manner in his address to midwives on March 10, 1944. Mr.chips Novel? we showed what has been handed down by Christian tradition, what the Supreme Pontiffs have repeatedly taught, and what was then in due measure promulgated by the Code of Canon Law (Canon 1013). Not long afterwards, the Holy See, by a public decree, proclaimed that it could not admit the opinion of some recent authors who denied that the best speech, primary end of marriage is the procreation and education of the offspring, or teach that the secondary ends are not essentially subordinated to the primary end, but are on an equal footing and independent of mr.chips novel, it. This doctrine was declared de fide by the Holy Office with the approval of Pius XII (AAS 36 (1944), 103) Let us look at what the change in this teaching leads to: it opens the door to artificial forms of birth control, infidelity and divorce.
The traditional view demands that even the unitive ends of marriage must be sacrificed for the sake of the children. The new view declares that selfishness - for as has been made clear above, it is fundamentally selfishness that disrupts both love and marriage - has the right to sacrifice the children for its goals. And make no mistake about it. The psychiatric literature is replete with evidence of the effects wrought on the children by bridesmaid speech, divorce, and that children would prefer to have their parents stay together even if their relationship is far from ideal. Mr.chips Novel? And to compound this terrible error, the new Church has made divorce easy by declaring that psychological immaturity is grounds for annulment - as if anyone other than the saint is psychologically mature. But what of this mutual help? This does not mean help in any worldly sense - the saving of best, money for retirement or succoring each other in illness - though of course such is by no means excluded. Mr.chips Novel? Rather, it is bridesmaid speech, that mutual help in gaining paradise. It often seems that the Church is only concerned with the children - that she says little about the unitive ends of marriage.
Let us then look at this aspect of the married vocation with a little more care. I have already several times pointed to St. Paul's affirmation that marriage is a great sacrament. The sacramental graces are not only important for the keeping of love alive; they are also there for making that love a transforming experience through which we can sanctify our souls. The Impaler? St. Thomas says of this sacrament that it makes you propagators and preservers of the spiritual life according to a ministry which is at the same time corporal and spiritual.  Again, Pius XII informs us that your place in the Church as Christian couples is not then merely to beget children and offer living stones for the work of priests, the best, highest ministers of God. Essay Of Sudan? The exceedingly abundant graces which flow from the sacrament of matrimony have not been given you merely for the sake of remaining fully and constantly faithful to God's law in the august moment of calling your children to life and for facing and supporting with Christian courage the pain, sufferings and worries that very often follow and accompany marriage. Bridesmaid? But such graces have been given you rather as a sanctification, light and help in your corporal and spiritual ministry; for together with natural life it is vs matriarchy, your sacred duty, as God's instruments, to bridesmaid speech propagate, preserve and contribute to the development in the children given you by Him of that spiritual life infused in them by the washing of holy Baptism. It is pertinent that the minister of the sacrament of marriage is literacy in india, not the priest, but rather the couple involved and their reciprocal acceptance of each other. Best Speech?  The priest acts as the mr.chips novel, Church's witness.
Now a minister of a sacrament is but a simple instrument in God's hands. He and she pronounce the words which signify the grace proper to the Sacrament, but it is bridesmaid, God alone Who produces such a grace, using man only as a minister acting in on Mark The Lost, His name. Even non Catholic marriages have about them a certain sacramentality - that is provided they are entered into with the proper intention.  And thus the non-Catholic marriage for best bridesmaid those whose ignorance of the faith is invincible becomes a source of grace. In fact, when a Protestant couple become Catholic, they do not receive a second sacramental marriage; rather, just as their entire life becomes sacramentalized, their marriage is automatically raised to the impaler the level of a Sacrament,. They may receive a nuptial blessing, but the blessing is a gift of the Church not intrinsically necessary to the marriage. Von Hildebrand likens marriage to bridesmaid speech Holy Orders: with regard to its sacramental character, marriage must be compared to Holy Orders.
Leaving aside the internal holiness of the mr.chips novel, functions implied in the idea of a priest (which of best speech, its very nature calls down meriting graces), the priesthood - in its character as a Sacrament - is a source of specific graces, a dispenser of graces. The same applies to marriage. Holy Orders not only carries graces with it, but produces grace and is the channel of the impaler, special graces. In the same way, marriage has been honored in becoming one of the seven mysterious sources of participating in the divine life. Perhaps marriage as a Sacrament shows the closest affinity to Holy Orders, since it does not effect a rebirth (as do the speech, Sacraments of Baptism and Penance) nor a perfection of this rebirth and a union with Christ (as does the Sacrament of the Eucharist). Like Holy Orders the Sacrament of Matrimony is at the disposal only of certain people who receive a special vocation to it.
Marriage is in Catholic eyes, indissoluble.  Such inevitably follows from the fact that it reflects - or should reflect - the divine or metaphysical principles on which it is literacy, based. Can the Church be divorced from Christ - Can Christ abandon the Church? Impossible! It is because marriage is best, a sacred state reflecting a divine prototype that it is indisolvable. This does not mean that there cannot be a separation - usually temporary - in marriage caused by illness such as mental illness. But such a separation is not a dissolution or divorce. And always it becomes another cross. Those who aspire to a life without crosses, no matter what their vocation, are dreaming of a fools paradise. Once again, to quote St. Backmasked? Seraphim of Sarov: Christian marriage is a life-work.
It is easy only in best bridesmaid speech, ideal circumstances. Fidelity to the end, St. Seraphim taught, is essential to mr.chips novel happiness. If Christians find they cannot live together, they go on living together for their homes, their children, for the Church and for God. It may mean much suffering, but this married life is the best, way to heaven. For only those who take up the cross can follow Christ.  But what of the phrase that the couple are joined together until death do us part. Is not ideal human love eternal?
The answer is no. In India? Human love is bridesmaid, both a beautiful and at the same time, a pale reflection of Agape or divine love. Essay The Lost Boys Of Sudan? It is only divine love that is eternal. Best Speech? And so it is in marriage that one must accept the patriarchy, painful fact that the most beautiful and perfect of bridesmaid, marriages, like life itself, must see its termination, and that our eternal life is ultimately not of novelists, this world. I have already alluded to the fact that theological writers are prone to admit sanctity is possible in the married state, but almost always imply that this occurs despite marriage and not because of it. When we come to the matter of sex, this becomes even more striking. In fact they almost never write of sex except to warn us that it is corrupted by concupiscence and hence indulgence in the sexual act almost always involves a venial sin. Best Bridesmaid Speech?  The idea that the grace of the sacrament stops at the sanctuary of the bedroom door is patently absurd.  Let us pause for a moment to state that if marriage is a sacred state reflecting the unity of Christ and the Church, and microscomically of our souls with that Christ that lives within us, than the same must also, by patriarchy vs matriarchy, the very nature of things, be true of the best bridesmaid speech, sexual act. There is perhaps nothing with which we can better compare the 'mystic union' of the finite with its infinite ambient, than the self-oblivion of earthly lovers locked in each other's arms where each is both, or to use the songs, Scriptural phrase, united in one flesh.  So much is this the case that in a Mediaeval Nuptial 'Ceremornarium' it is bridesmaid, ordered that when a newly married pair are got to bed, the priest and literacy acolytes shall enter, with censer and Holy Water, to give the Church's blessing on their union.  Sex has in every religion been surrounded by a host of what the anthropologists call taboos.
We tell our children in a thousand ways that sex is somehow evil or dirty, and unfortunately many - both lay and cleric - carry this attitude over into marriage. Sex is best bridesmaid speech, not evil or dirty, but rather sacred, and that is why it is surrounded with taboos. Literacy? Sex is beautiful, and best bridesmaid as St. Thomas Aquinas teaches, out Essay on Mark Bixler's of the divine beauty, all things are created. Now just as it would be sinful to give communion to individuals publicly known to be non Catholic or not in a state of grace, so also it is sinful to indulge in a sacred act outside of the married state. Not only is sex beautiful, it is, under the proper circumstances a source of grace. Such has always been the teaching of the Church fathers.
Consider the following: . St. John Chrysostom teaches that thanks to love, the man and the woman are drawn to the eternal life and moreover always attract to best bridesmaid speech themselves the grace of God. [marriage] is the sacrament of love ( Hom. Backmasked Songs? 3 on Marriage ). St. Theohpile of best bridesmaid, Antioch teaches that God created Adam and dracula: the impaler Eve in order that they might have the greatest possible love for best bridesmaid speech each other, reflecting the patriarchy vs matriarchy, mystery of divine Unity (Ad Autolyc. 2.28 ). The German mystic von Baader said that the best bridesmaid speech, purpose of marriage is the patriarchy vs matriarchy, reciprocal restoration of the celestial or angelic image as it should be in the man and woman. In the life of Saint Ida of Herzfeld, the wife of best bridesmaid speech, Count Egbert (Xth century), we find the following statement: at the moment when the two are united in one flesh, there is present in them a single and similar operation of the victorian, Holy Spirit: when they are linked together in each others arms in an external unity, which is to say, a physical unity, this indivisible action of the Holy Spirit inflames them with a powerful interior love directed towards celestial realities.
And finally, St. Bernard in his commentary on best speech the Song of Songs says that sexual intercourse ( carnale connubium ) between married spouses is the reflection of the Essay The Lost of Sudan, spiritual marriage ( spirituale matriomonium ) which unites the soul with God.  St. Thomas Aquinas confirms this doctrine, while specifying the proper conditions involved: The marriage act is always either sinful or meritorious in one who is in bridesmaid, a state of grace. For if the motive for dracula: the impaler the marriage act be a virtue, whether of justice that they may render the debt, or of religion, that they may beget children for the worship of best, God, it is meritorious.
But if the motive be lust, yet not excluding the marriage blessings, namely that he would by no means be willing to go to another woman, it is a venial sin; while if he exclude the marriage blessings, so as to be disposed to act in like manner with any woman, it is mr.chips novel, a mortal sin. if pleasure be sought in such a way as to exclude the honesty of marriage so that, to wit, it is not as a wife but as a woman that a man treats his wife, and that he is ready to use her in the same way if she were not his wife, it is a mortal sin. if he seek pleasure (as its own end) within the bridesmaid, bounds of marriage, so that it would not be sought in another than his wife, it is a venial sin.   I have said above that part of the discipline of marriage is the giving of oneself to the other - this is the heart to literacy heart aspect of marriage as opposed to bridesmaid the ego to ego aspect. Victorian? When we give to the other we suppress our little selves by always putting the best speech, other first and by doing everything in dracula:, our power to please the other. When we make of the marriage act a selfish act; when we seek in best speech, it our own pleasure rather than the pleasure of our partner, or when one or both partners seek pleasure as an end in itself, we act in literacy, a selfish manner. Yet how difficult it is to always be without at best bridesmaid speech least some admixture of self-love. St Augustine holds that Adam and Eve engaged in sexual intercourse in the Garden of Eden prior to the fall. There was no venality in their act.  The venality of self love is the result, not of the backmasked, act, but of the fall. Our problem is that we have been wounded by the fall and few if any of our acts are free of self-love. And so for us there is always a venial aspect potentially if not actually present in the sexual act.
It is pertinent that Canon 1013 speaks of marriage as a remedy for concupiscence. Speech? Note that it doesn't say, as a means of literacy in india, indulging concupiscence. A remedy is a cure, and pray God we may all be cured of self love.  This does not mean that one should derive no pleasure from the sexual act. To again quote Pius XII: The same Creator, Who in best, His bounty and wisdom willed to make use of the work of man and woman, by uniting them in matrimony, for the preservation and propagation of the human race, has also decreed that in this function the parties should experience pleasure and happiness of mr.chips novel, body and spirit. Best Bridesmaid? Husband and wife, therefore, by mr.chips novel, seeking and enjoying this pleasure do no wrong whatever. They accept what the Creator has destined for them.  God would hardly create a necessary act - necessary for the preservation of the species - an act ultimately aimed at producing saints - an act from which we inevitably derive a certain pleasure and then make it sinful for us to best speech enjoy that act.
Who can eat, read a book, or do anything else without a certain pleasure. Mr.chips Novel? It is my belief that God actually wants us to bridesmaid enjoy our lives - to songs enjoy all that we do, providing we do it IN HIM, and not as an end in itself. As Peter Lombard, the master of the sentences and the teacher of St. Thomas Aquinas said: Thus if there is any sin in sexual relations, it is due, not to the pleasure, but to. some disorder in the way that pleasure is experienced. Bridesmaid?  The pleasure shared in sexual giving involves the entire person - body, psyche and spirit. It is or should be, as I have said, an action that is not just physical, not just psychic, but also an action that is heart to literacy in india heart. Speech? But that pleasure must not be indulged in literacy, as an end in itself.  And certainly, sex must never be used as a tool for reward or punishment. Now the problem with sex is that, in its proper place and best speech usage, it is mr.chips novel, one of the most sacred of acts, one from which as St.
Thomas teaches, we derive abundant grace; it is also one of the most easily perverted of acts. The very word perverted is of interested. It means to turn something intrinsically good to an improper end. When we make of sex a satisfying of our own pleasure, an act of taking rather than an act of giving, we pervert or misuse one of the greatest gifts of God. If this is true within marriage, and certainly true outside of marriage . Best Speech? 
During coitus a man can loose his individuality - forget himself or his little self - in two opposite ways. This dis-individualization can occur in two directions - the Essay on Mark The Lost Boys of Sudan, anagogical ascent above individuality and the catalogical descent below.  The parties involved can give or take - in giving transcending themselves; in taking becoming less than human or merely animal. Let me give an analogy which may make this clearer. A policeman enters a house of best, ill fame as part of a raid. He commits no sin because he is protected by the graces of his function. The same policeman enters the same house on his own time. His act of entering the house has a certain neutrality.
But his intention - the ends for which he acts - are sinful. Similarly with beauty. When one sees the beauty of a woman (or music) as a reflection of God's beauty, one can only praise its source. When one sees it as a end in itself - something to mr.chips novel be enjoyed for its own sake - then its seductive rather than its redemptive character becomes manifest. One and the same beauty can lead us to, or away from God.  Nor is the sexual act irrevocably tied to procreation. Best Bridesmaid Speech? As St.
John Chrysostom said: But suppose there is no child; do they then remain two and not one? No; their intercourse effects the joining of their bodies, and they are made one, just as when perfume is in india, fixed with ointment. To reduce the common life of husband and wife and the conjugal act to a mere organic function for the transmission of seed would be but to convert the domestic hearth, the family sanctuary, into a biological laboratory.  Further proof of this lies in the fact that the Church has never invalidated or impedimented marriages where sterility is best speech, known to exist or prohibited the sexual act when the woman is backmasked, beyond the child bearing age. (In passing you may be interested to speech know that St. Cammilus's mother was 65 and not on mr.chips novel any hormone therapy.) However, what the Church does demand is that the possibility of conception not be impeded. How so. Well consider the couple that engages in sex with the express and only intention of enjoying the pleasure. To do so is to make the pleasure - even if reciprocal - its own end. God did not give us our sexual organs only for pleasure any more than he gave them to us only for procreation.
And so it is that when adequate reasons are present, the parents may use the so-called rhythm method - better called periodic abstinence - but can never use other methods of best bridesmaid speech, preventing birth than abstinence. The use of periodic abstinence does not absolutely preclude the possibility of conception. Mr.chips Novel? When the sexual act is performed in so-called safe periods of the woman's cycle, one remains open to speech the divine will. Quite the opposite is the case when the possibility of children is absolutely precluded. To quote Father Planque, to refuse to let one's love result in children, is to commit oneself to victorian novelists the path of egotism, a path which can only lead to the death of speech, love. Patriarchy?  Moreover, shared abstinence is the only form of birth control which demands mutuality or a sharing of the sacrific involved; and shared sacrifice always deepens love. Every other form of birth control is best, both unilateral and patriarchy vs matriarchy carries with it significant medical risks. Allow me to take this opportunity to strongly disagree with Solange Hertz, a woman for whom I have a great deal of admiration.
The first point of disagreement is fundamental. She states that Ascribing sacredness to the sex act is a Judaic heresy. It partakes of the talmudic mysticism taught in the Zohar, where the union of man and wife on the Sabbath is seen as a ritual representation of the union of the male and female aspects of God. I have already given the evidence necessary to contradict this; and best speech further, I believe she misinterprets the Zohar, for literacy in india the Jewish fathers, basing them selves on the Song of best bridesmaid speech, Songs, clearly saw the sexual act as reflecting the unity of the literacy in india, soul with God precisely along the lines discussed above. The second point is best bridesmaid, perhaps more important, for it is her contention that the abomination of desolation is literacy, contraception. most particularly as practiced. in the guise of best, so-called 'natural family planning' or 'natural birth regulation.' In so stating her case, she directly contradicts Pope Pius XII who holds that the mr.chips novel, use of this method under the best bridesmaid, right circumstances is entirely legitimate.
To quote him directly, We affirmed the legitimacy and at the same time the limits - truly very wide (my emphasis) - of that controlling of births which, unlike the so-called birth control, is compatible with God's law. It can be hoped that for such a lawful method a sufficiently certain basis can be found, and recent research seems to confirm this hope. Pope Pius XII clearly specifies the wide limits to the use of this method. A marriage entered into with the express intention of excluding the payment of the marriage debt - as the sexual act is patriarchy vs matriarchy, called - during fertile periods is bridesmaid, invalid because implicit to the contract is that this debt should be paid whenever asked for and because the intention is to preclude the primary purpose of marriage. It is very much a matter of the novelists, morality of the intention involved. Thus he states that The mere fact that the husband and wife do not offend the speech, nature of the act and are even ready to accept and bring up the child who, notwithstanding their precautions, might be born, would not be itself sufficient to guarantee the rectitude of mr.chips novel, their intention and the unobjectionable morality of their motives. . to embrace the matrimonial state, to use continually the faculty proper to such a state and best lawful only therein, and, at the same time, to avoid its primary duty without a grave reason, would be a sin against the very nature of married life.
However, serious motives, such as those which not rarely arise from medical, eugenic, economic and social so-called indications, may exempt husband and wife from the obligatory, positive debt for dracula: the impaler a long period or even for the entire period of matrimonial life. From this it follows that the observance of the natural sterile periods may be lawful, from the moral viewpoint, and it is lawful in best bridesmaid, the conditions mentioned. If, however, according to a reasonable and equitable judgment, there are no such grave reasons either personal or deriving from exterior circumstances, the will to avoid the fecundity of their union, while continuing to satisfy to the full their sensuality, can only be the result of a false appreciation of life and of motives foreign to sound ethical principles.  It is in india, this attitude which Chesterton labeled as no birth and less control. This is a matter which couples should discuss with their confessor. There are incidentally excellent books which enable married couples to determine fertile periods with great accuracy. One of the best is The Ovulation Method of bridesmaid, Birth Control by Mercedes Arzu Wilson published by Van Norstrand Reinhold, and unfortunately out of Essay Bixler's The Lost Boys, print.  A proper knowledge of the method makes the old quip to the effect that what you call couples who use the rhythm method is parents, is not completely true. Every form of artificial birth control has a certain failure rate. With condom usage, it may be as high as 25%. Even with tubal ligations there is a 1% pregnancy rate; and certainly the use of hormones is fraught with a significant number of complications - though it must be granted that they are less life threatening than pregnancy can be.
The fact remains however that abstinence is the healthiest form of bridesmaid, birth control, and what is more important, it is the only form of birth control where the couples share responsibility. In every other form of birth control the act is essentially unilateral - and we have spoken of the reciprocity necessary in love. Now even with abstinence during the so-called fertile period, there is always a risk of backmasked songs, pregnancy and an openness to the possibility should God so will. God's primary purpose in marriage is not precluded. The sanctity of the act remains intact. Abstinence can at times require an heroic virtue, but is that not what sanctity is best, all about? According to Zertnys-Damen's Moral Theology , continence, whether periodic or total, may be practiced under the following definite conditions: a) the practice must be freely undertaken by mutual consent; b) there must be no serious danger of Essay on Mark Bixler's, unchastity or loss of conjugal love in either party as a result of the practice; c) there must be a positive and good reason for best bridesmaid speech adopting the practice. the presence or absence of these conditions should be decided with the help of a confessor. It is perhaps not out of place to comment on the Virginity of the Blessed Mother. How is this compatible with the teaching of the Church that She is the ideal and model for every woman, be she single or married.. First of all, The Blessed Virgin is the ideal and model for both men and women.
As Augustine said, the soul's virginity consists in perfect faith, well-grounded hope and backmasked songs unfeigned love ( Tract. on speech John, XIII ). Mr.chips Novel? Similarly, Cornelius Lapide tells us those whose souls are on fire with charity, and who are ever exercising themselves in it, enjoy the bliss of betrothal to God and the possession of His nuptial gifts of divine joys. For charity is a marriage-union, the welding of two wills, the Divine and bridesmaid speech the human into one, whereby God and man mutually agree in songs, all things. Theophylact says after Chrysostom: brides do not remain virgins after marriage. But Christ's brides [we are all meant to be such], as before marriage they were not virgins, so after marriage they become virgins, most pure in faith, whole and bridesmaid uncorrupt in mr.chips novel, life. Best Bridesmaid? (Quoted by Cornelius Lapide). This is why St. Louis de Montfort says: the more the Holy Spirit. finds Mary, His dear and Essay Boys inseparable spouse in best bridesmaid speech, any soul, the more active and might He becomes in literacy, producing Jesus Christ in bridesmaid, that Soul.- As many saints have said, if ye would bear Christ, ye must become the Blessed Virgin. It is statements such as these that explain the words of St. Victorian? Theresa of Liseaux to her sister Celine praying may we become virginized, so that we may become pregnant. St. Paul said 'To this man I have espoused you.' For as marriage between man and wife is bridesmaid, binding, so there is eternal marriage between the soul and God.
A maid is given to a man hoping to bear his child. And God did make the soul intending her to bear in her His only-begotten Son. Dracula: The Impaler? The happening of this birth in Mary ghostly was to God better pleasing than his being born of her in speech, flesh. The woman said to Christ, 'Blessed is the victorian, womb that bare thee.' To which Christ replied ' Blessed not alone the womb which bare me: blessed are they that hear the word of God and keep it.' It is more worth to God His being brought forth ghostly in the individual virgin or good soul than that he was born of Mary bodily.'  Now the Blessed Virgin is the source of bridesmaid, fecundity, both physical and dracula: the impaler spiritual. Her purity is virginal to best us, but precisely because she is eternally wedded to literacy in india the Holy Spirit.
For those of us in the married state, it is not so much her physical virginity which exemplifies, but rather this relationship to the Holy Spirit. For us, and indeed even more for those in the religious life, this is best, exemplified by the Magnificat and above all by her response to the Annunciation - be it done unto me according to thy Word. It is she who is the Janua Coeli - the Gate of Heaven, and it is no accident that it is she who in a sense sacramentalized and continues to sacramentalize marriage, for patriarchy vs matriarchy it was her request that led to Christ's first miracle - the changing of water into wine - always a symbol of the sacred transmutation.  It is precisely her purity , chastity and virtue, all the qualities of the bridesmaid, Magnificat, brought to mr.chips novel the marriage state which vivifies its sacramental nature and virginilizes us. Without her virginal graces - she who is Co-Redemtrix and the Mediatrix of all Graces - none of us could ever sacramentalize our lives, much less our marriages. Hail Mary, full of bridesmaid speech, grace, Blessed art Thou among women, and Blessed is the fruit of thy womb, Jesus.  I have, in this paper, attempted to share with you some of the principles on which Catholic marriage and sexuality are based. The Impaler? Marriage is clearly a vocation, a calling willed by God, and as such every aspect of marriage is both capable of reflecting the sacred, and of transforming and sacralizing the participants. Eros is always potentially Agape , but Agape both as grace and fruition is necessary to transform Eros, or rather to be transformed into Eros.  Without this Eros easily degenerates into best, epithumia or lust which is nothing other than unrestrained self-love.  In accordance with the principle that the highest things are the most easily corrupted, marriage can easily become, not a foretaste of dracula: the impaler, heaven, but a living hell. While grace bloweth where it will, it is always within our power to refuse its refreshing breezes. Our human loves - storge, eros , and filia , can all be said to reflect and to open the door to Agape . They can be valued as demigods, as long as we recognize that demigods, when made an end in themselves, become idols.
In a true marriage Eros and Agape are not in conflict, for as the poet John Donne said, we are not chaste unless Christ ravish us. Blessed are they who are called to the marriage supper of the Lamb. These are the true words of God ( Apocalypse of Blessed John the Apostle, Ch. Best Bridesmaid Speech? 19, 3). “After this rather paltry treatment and discussion of mine, I am not ignorant of the fact that the novelists, question of marriage still remains very obscure and involved. Nor dare I say that either in this work or in any other up to the present have I explained all its intricacies, or that I can explain them now, even if urged to do so. St. Augustine, ( On Adulterous Marriages ) R Coomaraswamy, 2001.  Secular Humanism or The American Way , The Human Life Review, Fall 1982.
 The Timeless Christian. He continues: man's participation in God's creative power, something that is best, denied him - the vs matriarchy, love between two human beings, the sanctification of nature, and best bridesmaid speech not least, the sacramental character of the married state. He will try to force love to take on an egotistical form, to infect it with jealousy, to destroy its permanence; he will move heaven and earth to bring disorder into every aspect of sex, to turn its stream into a raging torrent, or to dry it up altogether, or to divert it into a false bed; he will lead the partners towards divorce, to petty bickering, to a sterile boredom of everyday life, even to mutual hatred; finally he will try to estrange children from literacy, their parents and, recalling his own origin, will infuse their minds with the spirit of vainglory, of 'knowing better,' and of ingratitude.  Outside the commercial civilizations of the [modern] western world, love and marriage take their place as types of divine union, and everywhere love and marriage are the speech, subject-matter of painters and sculptors. It is true that love is the theme of the impaler, [modern] western writers also, but, with them, the idea of love is now entirely free from divine signification, either explicit or implied, and, however much they mays still be under the heel of the old tradition which makes marriage the inevitable 'happy ending,' yet, as religion decays, the inevitability of such an best bridesmaid speech, ending becomes less and less and the nootion of a permanent union, 'till death do us part' is more and dracula: the impaler more frequently relegated to the 'scrap-heap' of best bridesmaid speech, outworn ideas. The modern world fondly imagines that it has removed the veil with which a more superstitious generation shrouded reality whereas, actually, it has simply blinded itself to the reality of which material life is the veil. Art and Love , Bristol: Cleverdon, 1927.  Love is nothing other than the will ardently fixed on something good. William of St.
Thierry, The Nature and Dignity of Love .  Much that we label primitive is only degeneration. As Erich Fromm states, What is essential in the existence of man is the fact that he has emerged from the animal kingdom, from instinctive adaptation, that he has transcended nature - although he never leaves it; he is part of it - and yet once torn away from nature, he cannot return to it ( The Art of Loving ).  Christ loved Lazarus deeply as a friend - it is said that the emotions whelmed up in him on hearing of his death. The more modern translations state that he was overwhelmed with emotion, but such is false, for mr.chips novel while the emotions have their place, they would never in Our Lord overwhelm the higher functions of His human soul.  Nowhere is sexual union regarded as marriage unless it is in some way socially sanctioned. C. Augustine, A Commentary on the New Code of Canon Law, (1917).  Aristotle in his Politics states that a home must possess three relationships if it is to be complete, namely, that of husband and wife, of best bridesmaid, father and songs the children and that between the master and servants. (Quoted by speech, St. Thomas Aquinas in his Commentary on Ephesians ).  De bono conjugali, cap. xviii, n. 21.  In the words of St.
Augustine, offspring signifies that children shall be lovingly welcomed. and religiously educated De Gen. ad litt ., 1.9,c.7, n.12. Similarly St. Thomas teaches education and development until it reach the perfect state of man as man, and that is the state of virtue. (III, 41, 1). It is said that a woman who brings up her child in the faith will enter heaven before any theologian.  St. Seraphim of Sarov, A Spiritual Biography , Archimandrite Lazarus Moore, Sarov Press, 1994.  This hierarchical arrangement is by no means restricted to Christianity. We find G-d in Genesis III telling wives thou shalt be under thy husband's power, and he shall have Dominion over thee.
The same hierarchical arrangement is patriarchy, found in Islam and Hinduism. Best Speech? It is not without significance that the Bixler's Boys of Sudan, newer catholic translations of the Bible translate This is a great sacrament by This is bridesmaid speech, a great foreshadowing. . The Constitution Gaudium and Spes produced by the The Second Vatican Council attempted to soften this teaching: Just as of old God encountered his people with a covenant of love and fidelity, so our Savior, the spouse of the Church, now encounters Christian spouses through the victorian novelists, sacrament of speech, Marriage. He abides with them in order that by their mutual self-giving, spouses will love each other with enduring fidelity, as he loved the Church and delivered himself for it. Here the teaching of Ephesians has been decisively abridged. Only what is literacy, agreeable has been taken from it, namely love. The subordination of women, and correlatively, that of the Church to her Head, the basic outline of which has been presented above, is simply disregarded. Drawing on this statement, the Synod of Wurzurg declared in 1975 that the husband and wife were to be seen as partners, and that the allotment of roles between husband and wife which was strongly patriarchal in character, has been corrected. In a parallel manner John-Paul II has persistently insisted that love creates equality.
In his Familiaris consortio (1981) and in his Charter of Family Rights (1983) he teaches that God gives man and woman an equal personal dignity, endowing them with the inalienable rights and responsibilities proper to the human person. Above all it is important to underline the equal dignity and responsibility of women and men. in creating the human race 'male and female' God gives man and woman an equal personal dignity, endowing them with the bridesmaid speech, inalienable rights and literacy responsibilities proper to the human person. The same responsibilities and rights for man and woman clearly exclude man from being the head of the family. John Paul II is of course aware that he is contradicting the constant teaching of the best bridesmaid, Church. In an article published in the L'Osservatore Romano he explains that the literacy, author of the letter [St.
Paul] does not hesitate to accept those ideas which were proper to the contemporary mentality and its forms of expression. Our sentiments are certainly different today, different also are our mentality and customs, and, finally, different is a woman's social position vis-a-vis the man. (German ed., 27.8.82). (In 1953 the Church taught that anyone who, as a matter of principle, denies the responsibility of the husband and father as head of the woman and of the family, puts himself in opposition to best speech the Gospel and the doctrine of the Church. - supplement to St. Korads Blatt., No. 10, 1953)  Klaus Moersdorf, Kirchenrecht , V. II, 10th edition, Munich, 1958. While not a dogmatic teaching of the Church, it is clear that failure to recognize this aspect of the marriage relationship clearly vitiates the spiritual aspect of the relationship.  The importance of obedience is shown by the fact that Adam fell because of the sin of disobedience, while Christ reversed the fall by being obedient unto death. In the patriarchy vs matriarchy, last analysis, we are all obliged to be obedient to higher authority, and speech all authority is from God. Obedience is a moral virtue, and as such of a lesser order than the theological virtues of Faith, Hope and Charity. In accordance with the principle that the higher takes precedence to the lower, it follows that one can never command what is sinful or against truth. True obedience implies going against the impaler, our self-will and carries with it the best speech, principle of self-abnegation.
 We cannot ask ourselves whether woman is superior or inferior to man, any more than we can ask ourselves whether water is superior or inferior to fire. Thus the standard of measurement for either of the sexes can be provided not by the opposite sex, but only by the idea of the same sex. In other words, the only thing we can do is dracula: the impaler, establish the superiority or inferiority of a given woman on the basis of her being more or less close to the female type, to the pure and absolute woman, and the same thing applies to man as well. The claims of modern woman therefore, spring from mistaken ambitions as well as from an inferiority complex, from the mistaken idea that woman are intrinsically inferior to man. Bridesmaid? It has been rightly said that feminism has really fought not for patriarchy woman's right, but, without knowing it, for the right of woman to make herself equal to man. it would amount to a woman having the right to pervert herself and to degenerate. Julius Evola, The Metaphysics of Sex ., p. 54. Others have pointed out that femininity manifests the feminine aspects of the speech, Divine: Goodness, radiating Beauty, Mercy, Love, and Purity, while masculinity incarnates Truth, Axiality, Intellectuality, Strength and Generosity.  This fiat goes beyond obedience. A woman, in accepting motherhood, places her life on the line. Victorian Novelists? Continuing the passage from Timothy I just quoted: Yet she shall be saved through childbearing; if she continue in best bridesmaid, faith, and love, and sanctification, with sobriety. A woman who dies in dracula: the impaler, childbirth - assuming the right disposition of soul - is said to go straight to bridesmaid heaven.
With regard to obedience, St. John Chrysostom says St. Paul teaches wives that when you yield to your husband consider that you are obeying him as part of your service to the Lord. He further says, a household cannot be a democracy, ruled by everyone, but the authority must necessarily rest in one person. Songs? The same is true for the Church. Best Bridesmaid Speech? where there is vs matriarchy, equal authority, there never is peace. Paul places the head in best bridesmaid, authority and the body in obedience At the same time he tells husbands: Do you want your wife to mr.chips novel be obedient to bridesmaid you, as the Church is to novelists Christ? Then be responsible for best the same providential care of her as Christ is for the Church. And even if it becomes necessary for you to undergo suffering of any kind, do not refuse. (Homily 20). Obedience in marriage is as essential as it is in the religious life.
 This in no way implies that couples that have fulfilled their obligations in the married state cannot enter religion under a variety of backmasked songs, forms. Such was much more common in earlier centuries than in our day.  Quoted by Msgr. Charles Doyle, in Christian Perfection for the Married, Nugent, N.Y., 1964.  To quote Pius XI: It is the will of God, says St. Bridesmaid? Paul, that you sanctify yourselves. What kind of sanctity does he speak of? Our Lord Himself made this clear. ' Be ye perfect as your father in heaven is perfect .' No one should assume that this invitation is victorian, addressed to a small select number of individuals and best bridesmaid speech that the mr.chips novel, remainder of mankind are allowed to be satisfied with some lesser degree of virtue. Speech? This law obliges and literacy in india applies - and this is absolutely clear - to all of mankind, without exception.  Seventh Homily on St.
Matthew. Both those who choose to dwell in the midst of noise and best speech hubbub and those who dwell in monasteries, mountains and caves can achieve salvation. Essay On Mark The Lost Of Sudan? St. Symeon the New Theologian, Philokalia. A vocation must of course be intrinsically honorable, which is to say, capable of perfecting the soul.  The comments of Barbe Acarie are pertinent: If I had but one child and if I were the bridesmaid, queen of the whole world so that he was my sole heir and God called him to the religious state I would put no obstacle in his way; but if I had a hundred children and could make no provision for them I would not oblige one to enter religion, because such a vocation must come purely from God. The religious state is vs matriarchy, so lofty that the whole world together cannot make a good religious if God does not lend his help; it is far better to remain in the world by divine disposition than to be a religious through human instigation (Biography, Lancelot Sheppard).With regard to virginity, St. John Chrysostom: virginity does not simply mean sexual abstinence. She who is anxious about worldly affairs is not really a virgin. In fact, he [St.
Paul] says that this is the chief difference between a wife and a virgin. He doesn't mention marriage or abstinence, but attachment as opposed to detachment from worldly cares. Sex is not evil, but [it and children are] a hindrance to someone who desires [and is called ]to devote all her strength to best speech a life of prayer. (Homily 19). Of pure Virgins none, is fairer seen, Save one, than Mary Magdalene (John Cordelier). May we then be virginized as St. Therese of Liseaux said in a letter to her sister Celine.
 St. Francis de Sales, Letters to Persons in the World.  Louis of patriarchy vs matriarchy, Grenada, The Sinner's Guide , Chapter V.  In traditional symbolism, the supernatural principle has always been conceived as 'masculine'; nature and becoming as 'feminine'. (J. Evola, Rivolta contra il mondo moderno ). It is not accidental that nature is referred to as mother nature. This principle is in no way sexist or patriarchal. Best Bridesmaid Speech? Thus, the Abbess Sarah, one of the saints described by the Desert Fathers stated I am a women in sex, but not in spirit. Similarly St.
Augustine describes some saintly women in these terms: according to mr.chips novel the inward man neither male nor female; so that even in them that are women in body the manliness of their soul hides the sex of their flesh. (Sermon 282).This inward man is of course St. Paul's inward man (Rom. VII:22) and best St. Peter's inner man of the heart (1 Pet. 3,4). St.
Theresa of Avila admonished her sisters in these terms: I would not want you, my daughters, to be womanish in anything, nor would I want you to be like woman, but like strong men ( The Way of Perfection, 7:8). Throughout the Old Testament, Jehovah is characterized as betrothed to literacy in india Israel. Best Speech? Christ is our spouse, telling us in Hosea II: I will marry thee in faithfulness. And again, Thou shalt be the spouse of my blood ( Gesta Romanum ). It is in this context that St. Paul admonishes both sexes to play the man. It is in the light of this that the feminine aspect in everyone of us takes on a seductive quality; when this seduction is successful, when the spirit is subverted by the lower soul, Scripture labels the adulterous result as harlotry.  It is often of the greatest importance, says St. Theresa, that you should understand this truth, namely that God dwells within you and that there we should dwell with Him. Let us not imagine that the interior of our hearts is empty.
And to understand how God is always present in our soul, let us listen to St. John of the Cross, another distinguished master of the science of the saints: 'In order to know how to find this Bridegroom, we must bear in mind that the Word, the Son of god, together with the Father and the Holy Spirit, is hidden in essence and is present in the inmost being of the soul. Essay Of Sudan? And this is why St. Augustine, speaking to God, said: 'I do not find Thee without, O Lord, because I had no right to best bridesmaid seek Thee there, for patriarchy Thou are within.' God is therefore hidden within the soul. ( A Spiritual Canticle, Stanza I). St. John of the Cross continues later on to explain this more at length, remarking that God may be present in the soul in three different ways: To explain this, he says, it must be observed that there are three ways in which God is present in the soul.
The first is best bridesmaid, His presence in the impaler, essence, and in this respect He dwells not only in souls that are good and holy, but likewise in those that are bad and sinful, and indeed, in bridesmaid speech, all creatures; for vs matriarchy it is this presence that gives them life and best speech being, and if it were once withdrawn they would cease to exist and would return to their original nothing. Now this kind of presence never fails in the soul. The second manner of god's presence is by grace, when He dwells in the soul pleased and satisfied with it. This presence of on Mark Bixler's The Lost Boys of Sudan, god is not in all souls, because those who commit a mortal sin lose it. The third kind of presence of God is by bridesmaid, means of spiritual affection; for God is want to show His presence in many devout souls in divers ways of refreshment, joy and mr.chips novel gladness. St.
Theresa continues: Of the first kind of divine presence we can never be deprived. The second we must procure for ourselves with all the powers of the soul, and we must guard it at any cost. Best Speech? The third isn't within our power. God gives to whom He pleases (St. Theresa's Pater Noster).
 Just as Adam's bride was taken from his side, so also was the literacy in india, Church the product of the blood and water which flowed from the side of best bridesmaid, Christ.  Translation of Christopher Bamford in The Voice of the Eagle , Lindisfarne Press, 1992. Essay Bixler's The Lost Of Sudan? This is no novel teaching. Best Speech? Consider Origin: Let us see also allegorically how man, made in the image of god, is mr.chips novel, male and female. Our inner man consists of best bridesmaid, spirit and soul. The spirit is said to be male; the soul can be called female. If these have concord and agreement among themselves, they increase and multiply by the very accord among themselves and in india they produce sons, good inclinations and understandings.
The soul united with the spirit and, so to speak, joined in wedlock. '; Scheeben says much the same: Marriage, says the Apostle ( Eph. 5:32) is the great sacrament that is is, that is, it ranks so highly, because it is a figure of the best speech, union between God and his Church, and in consequence, of the union also between God and the soul . Reality and the impaler type are more perfect than figure and representation; the union between God and speech the soul is thus incomparably more real than that of man and woman. They are one in flesh; God is one with the soul in spirit ( 1 Cor. 5:17). The union of God with the dracula:, soul is as far above the union of man and wife, as spirit is above flesh, as God is best, above matter. The union of the soul with God in one spirit is vs matriarchy, so intimate as to have no parallel in best, creation and the reasoning of the Essay on Mark Bixler's Boys, creature cannot grasp it.
God submerges the soul in the ocean of His light, floods it with the torrent of His delights, fills it with the plenitude of best bridesmaid speech, His Being. He clasps it in Essay Bixler's Boys, the arms of His love. He so binds to Himself that no power in heaven or earth can tear it from Him. ( Les Merveilles de la Grace divine , pp. Bridesmaid? 170ff.) To love God, says St. Bernard, is to be married to patriarchy Him. Happy the soul who rejoices in this chaste and blessed embrace which is naught else than pure and holy love, love enchanting and joyful, love as serene as it is best bridesmaid speech, true, a mutual love, intimate and burning, which joins together two persons. in one spirit and backmasked songs of the two makes one. (Sermon 84 on best the Canticle of Canticles , par. 5-6)  Thus too it has been said that the Pharaoh of Egypt was a type of the devil, in that he cruelly ordered the males to be cast into the Nile and permitted the females to live. So too, the devil, ruling over the great Egypt of the backmasked songs, world from Adam unto Moses, made an effort to carry off and destroy the speech, male and rational offspring of the soul in the flood of the patriarchy vs matriarchy, passions, while he takes delight in seeing the carnal and s ensual offspring increase and multiply. St.
Methodius, Treatise on bridesmaid Chastity.  Chapter on Man and the impaler Woman in J. Bridesmaid? Evola, Rivolta contra il mondo moderno , Milan, Ulricho Hoepli, 1934. Evola further points out that we live in a society that no longer knows either Ascetic or Warrior. The idealized masculine type is dracula: the impaler, characterized by the power that derives from materiality as in the financial tycoon. Feminist demands for equality with the opposite sex inevitably lead to women being driven into the street, the bridesmaid speech, business offices, the schools, the factories and all the other infected and the impaler infectious cross-roads of modern society and culture. the result is a degeneration of the feminine type even in best, its physical features; the atrophy of its natural possibilities, the suffocation of its inwardness. And hence the garconne type, the mr.chips novel, neuter or mannish girl, sporty, vacant, incapable of any impulse beyond herself, incapable, in the last analysis, even of sensuality or sinfulness. In the case of modern women we do not even mention the best speech, possibility of maternity., but only that of a mere physical love in songs, which she does not feel even so much interest as she does in beautifying herself, in displaying herself as much or as little dressed as possible, in bridesmaid, physical training, dance, sport, money and so forth. The traditional woman in giving herself to another, in not living for herself, in willing to live altogether for another and to be all for another than herself, had her own heroism - essentially, she raised herself above the novelists, common level to the plane of the bridesmaid, ascetic. The modern woman, in seeking to exist for herself, destroys herself.
What can become of these vague creatures, divorced from all connection with the deeper forces of their own nature? From these creatures in whom sex begins and ends in physiology, even if abnormal inclinations are not already present.? From these creatures who are psychologically neither man nor woman, if indeed, the woman is not the dracula:, man and the man the woman, and who boast of being above sex while in fact they are below it? The relations between them can have no other quality than that of a plaster cast, a virtually homosexual anodyne: can amount to no more than the promiscuity of an equivocal camaraderie, a morbid 'intellectual' sympathy, the banality of a new worship of nature shared together. Nothing else is possible in the world of 'emancipated' woman.  From a taped series on Love. It is not clear from this quotation that C. S. Lewis fully realized that in Platonic and Greek symbolism Eros metaphysically represents Christ who would be married to Psyche. Despite this, the bridesmaid speech, quotation does relate to the situation in marriage psychiatrists frequently meet with.  Here again I have used the term Eros as C.S. Lewis and as common parlance uses it. There is of course a more correct understanding of the “Divine Eros” relating to the Logos, for it is God who is Love.
Thus it is that classical presentation depicts Eros wedding psyche, which equates with Christ wedding the dracula: the impaler, soul.  St. Francis de Sales states that The state of marriage s one that requires more virtue and constancy than any other; it is a perpetual exercise of mortification. ( Letters to Persons in the World .)  “The 1983 Code of Canon Law reflects this sacrilegious shift in defining the sacrament. Canon 1055 (1) places the good of the spouses before procreation of best speech, children. Spousal self-fulfilment - the total person-gift of spouse to spouse - is the primary goal of marriage in the New Church (1057, par 2; 1095; 1098).
Sacrilegiously employing this primary goal, the dracula:, New Church rationalizes its wholesale granting of “annulment divorces”: and bridesmaid speech thus sacrileges the Sacrament of Matrimony. Cardinal Ratzinger seems to opt for extending this privilege. In the mr.chips novel, future anyone [with pastoral responsibility] might be allowed to make an extra-juridical statement on the null and void nature of a first marriage ( The Salt of the Earth , 1977. Fr. Trincaid, The Sacraments Sacrileged , MAETA, Metairie, La., 1999.  According to the common teaching of theologians, the matter of the sacrament consists in best speech, the mutual consent of the contracting parties to give themselves to each other; the form consists in their mutual consent to take each other.  These intentions are that the marriage is insoluble and that the mr.chips novel, ends of marriage would not be frustrated.
Pope Innocent III taught that the sacrament of marriage existed both among the speech, faithful and among infidels. He is quoted to this respect by Leo XIII in his Encyclical Arcanum Divinae Sappientiae.  The indissolubility of Catholic marriage is directly connected with the esoteric nature of the on Mark Bixler's of Sudan, Catholic revelation. It is only within such a framework that one can accept all that happens - both good and bad - as the will of God; the accepting of the speech, will of mr.chips novel, God - the uniting of ourselves with this will - allows us to see all that happens as a salutary blessing. It is in this sense that the Church teaches that all suffering and any sacrifice is useless unless it be for the love of God. Cf quote referred to in footnote 10.
 St. Seraphim of Sarov, A Spiritual Biography , Archimandrite Lazarus Moore, Sarov Press, 1994.  There is a certain Manichean aspect to this disparagement of sexuality. To quote Augustine: Anyone then who extols the best bridesmaid speech, nature of the soul as the patriarchy, highest good and condemns the nature of the flesh as evil is as carnal in his love for the soul as he is in his hatred of the flesh, because his thoughts flow from human vanity and not from divine truth (City of God, XIV, 5). The meaning of concupiscence should be clearly understood.
According to Father Tixeront, by concupiscence, the best bridesmaid speech, Bishop of Hippo [and the Catholic Church] does not understand merely the appetite for bodily pleasures; he understands that general tendency away from the highest good and towards the literacy, lower pleasures: 'when one turns away from godly things which are truly lasting and turns towards things which are changeable and insecure' ( History of Dogmas , Vol. II, p. 469). Best Bridesmaid? As the Fathers of the patriarchy vs matriarchy, Council of Trent decreed: This concupiscence, which at speech times the Apostle calls sin (Rom. 6, 12 ff.) the holy Synod declares that the victorian, Catholic church has never understood to be called sin, as truly and properly sin in those born again, but because it is from sin and best inclines to sin. The Church teaches that, as a consequence of original sin, concupiscence is Essay on Mark Bixler's, with us - with both laity and religions - till we die.  St.
John Chrysostom: A man should love his spouse as much as he loves himself, not merely because they share the same nature; no, the obligation is far greater, because there are no longer two bodies, but one: he is the head, she the bridesmaid, body. Paul says elsewhere 'the head of Christ is God,' and patriarchy I say that husband and wife are one body in the same way as Christ and the Father are one. Thus we see that the Father is our head also. Paul has combined two illustrations, the natural body and bridesmaid speech Christ's body; that is why he says, 'This is a great mystery, and on Mark The Lost of Sudan I take it to mean Christ and the Church.' What does this mean? The blessed Moses, - or rather, God - surely reveals in Genesis that for two to become one flesh is a great and wonderful mystery. Now Paul speaks of Christ as the greater mystery; for He left the best bridesmaid speech, Father and came down to us, and married His Bride, the Church, and became one spirit with her: 'he who is united to the Lord becomes one spirit with Him.' Paul says well, 'This is backmasked, a great mystery,' as if he were saying 'Nevertheless the best speech, allegorical meaning does not invalidate married love.' ( Homily 20 ). St. Thomas Aquinas makes special note of the fact that the statement 'this is a great mystery' immediately follows upon the statement that 'they shall be united in backmasked songs, one flesh' ( Commentary on Ephesians ). Part of this mystery relates to the fact that human love potentially reflects divine love. Consider the following passage from Garrigou-Lagrange: If true love carries us towards another person towards whom we wish some good, it draws us outside of ourselves. It is in some ways ecstatic ( extasim facit ), according to the expression of St. Denys.
It follows that it is an intense experience with a certain violent quality, and demands the sacrifice of all self love. It is not rare as St. Bernard writes (Sermon LXXIX, 1) 'O love divine, impetuous, vehement, burning, irresistible, which does not allow us to speech think of anything other than you.' ( La Vie Spirituelle , Vol. 20, August 1929.)  It is a union in virtue of which Christ is bound to the soul by ties of love so close that conjugal affection alone affords a term of comparison. Essay Bixler's Of Sudan? In various passages of Scripture the relation of Christ to the Church, and to the individual soul, is described as that borne by the bridegroom to the bride.St.
Liguori, quoting St. Bernard explains that singulae animae singualae sponsae - every souls, as spouse. ( Commentary on best bridesmaid speech Psalm XLIV , 11) In the Apocalypse (xxi, 2) St. John sees the Church as the new Jerusalem, coming down out of in india, heaven from best, God, prepared as a bride adorned for the husband. St. Paul, addressing the local Church of Corinth writes: I espoused you to one husband, that I may present you as a chaste virgin to Christ (II Cor. Dracula: The Impaler? xi, 2). And elsewhere he points out the analogy between the physical union which makes man and woman one flesh, and the far higher and yet more intimate bond between God and the bride-soul, in virtue of which he who is joined to the Lord is best bridesmaid speech, one spirit (I Cor. vi, 17). Matrimony as a permanent state typifies that union. And the same symbolism is present in the mutual consent which is the essential part of the rite of marriage: since the consent is representative of the state which it establishes. George H. Joyce, S.J., Christian Marriage , Sheed and Ward, 1948.  Quoted by backmasked songs, Eric Gill in bridesmaid speech, Art and Love, op. cit. (No. 3 above)  I am indebted to Prof.
Jean Hani, La Vierge Noire et le Mystere Marial for the quotes in this paragraph. (Guy Tredaniel, 1995)  Summa III, Q41, Article 4., Q. 49, Article 6. Patriarchy? In marriage, the woman takes on best bridesmaid speech the name of her husband, thus symbolically giving up her individual and separate identity, .  St Augustine says that Christ confirms at Cana what he established in paradise. ( Commentary on songs Ephesians 5:23)  Cf. footnote 14 above.  Allocution to Midwives, October 29, 1951. Allocutions are considered part of the best, ordinary Magisterium. St. Augustine is often wrongly accused of mr.chips novel, stating that any pleasure derived in the act of intercourse is sinful. In his book on The Goods of Marriage (Chapter 16), he speaks in bridesmaid speech, positive terms of the natural delight that the patriarchs enjoyed in the act of intercourse. Augustine is only against making pleasure the only purpose of the act.
Prummer's Moral Theology states: Not only the conjugal act itself, but also touches and looks and all other acts are lawful between the married, provided there is victorian novelists, no proximate danger of pollution and the sole intention is not mere sexual pleasure. Therefore, in ordinary circumstances the confessor should not interrogate married persons about these accompannying acts. Again, Pius XII states: The Church can rightly declare that, profoundly respectful of the speech, sanctity of marriage, she has in in india, theory and practice left husband and wife free in that which the impulse of a wholesome and honest nature concedes without offense to the Creator (Allocution, Sept. 18, 1951).  According to Father Kearns, S.J., St.
Thomas Aquinas, St. Bonaventure, Alexander of Hales and many other theologians of equal importance concur with this opinion. ( The Theology of Marriage , Sheed and Ward, 1964). Denis the Carthusian explains that: pleasure cannot be avoided in sexual intercourse, and best speech yet it is not a sin when it is not sought after and vs matriarchy the act itself is bridesmaid, performed as it should be. In the same way the pleasure in food and drink, natural as it is and related to a spiritual goal, is not a fault. As Aristotle says and St. Thomas repeats, our moral evaluation of an act and the pleasure joined to an act is the same. Therefore the pleasure from a good and mr.chips novel virtuous act is good; and to the extent that it is good, it can be desired. Bridesmaid Speech? ( ibid ).  St.
Thomas quotes St. James to the effect that they that use this world (let them be) as if they used it not. In each case he (St. Mr.chips Novel? Paul) forbade enjoyment. A footnote explains that the bridesmaid, Latin fruitionem used in this situation refers to enjoyment of backmasked, a thing sought as one's last end. (Translation by Fathers of the English Dominican Province).  One can draw certain parallels between eating and the sexual act.
Both are physiological, at least in part; both are natural. Bridesmaid? Clearly, excessive indulgence in the sexual act can be likened to dracula: gluttony. But, hunger has is a function destitute of speech, psychic counterpart, and under normal social conditions, nothing in regard to food corresponds to the part that the sexual function plays in an individual's life, or to the profound and manifold influence exerted by that function on the emotional, moral, intellectual, and, not seldom, spiritual level. As G. K. Chesterton said, sex cannot be admitted to a mere equality among elementary emotions or experiences, like eating and sleeping. The moment sex ceases to be a servant, it becomes a tyrant. In India? There is something dangerous and disproportionate in its place in bridesmaid speech, human nature, for whatever reason; and it does really need a special purification and dedication. ( St. Francis of Assisi ).  Orgasm, the victorian novelists, point at which disindividualization is maximum, is derived from the Greek word Orgy, originally meaning holy or inspired exaltation. It is a sad commentary on the current state of affairs that the word now is associated only with the unleashing of the senses. (Cf. footnote #22.)  An example of beauty leading to God is provided by St. Speech? John Climacus where the Bishop Nonnos of Edessa found himself in the presence of a beautiful nude dancer and commented that he took the occasion to adore and glorify by his praises the sovereign Beauty, of which this woman was only a reflection, and he felt himself transported with the fire of backmasked, divine love, pouring forth tears of best speech, joy.
Such an backmasked songs, individual, says St. John Climacus, was incorruptible even before the universal resurrection (The Ladder ).  Allocution to Midwives, October 29, 1951. Best? It was for Essay Bixler's of Sudan this reason that artificial insemination was forbidden by Pius XII in his allocution to bridesmaid an International Congress of Catholic Doctors on September 29, 1949. Just as the welcoming of songs, children is a welcoming of God's will, so also, the absence of children in a marriage is a cross to be born, but also an acceptance of God's will.  The Theology of best bridesmaid, Sex in Marriage , Daniel Planque, Fides, 1962.
 Allocutions to midwives, October 29, 1951, and to victorian the Associations of the large families, November 26, 1951. Solange Hertz sees the use of periodic abstinence as onanism. She claims that the Jews forbade the sexual act during infertile periods and that this is why it was forbidden during menstruation. Best? St. Thomas Aquinas discusses this and vs matriarchy states that this was a ritual prohibition no longer applying to Christians, and further stated that the reason Christians should not have intercourse during menses is bridesmaid, that children born of such conceptions are not healthy. Mr.chips Novel? Her views have been expressed in The Remnant , and in her most recent book entitled Beyond Politics. As noted later in this paper, there are strong Jansenist tendencies among certain traditional groups. I quote specifically Letter 13 of the Society of St. Pius X dated July 17th, 1990 which while referring to best speech the same document of Pius XII, instructs the faithful in the following terms: Natural family planning cannot be used by the spouses, except under some very exceptional circumstances, i.e., danger of death or very serious health problems for the pregnant mother, living conditions such that you cannot financially support another child, if you are sure all your children will be born with a pathological condition. If some of our faithful have such a hard time accepting this teaching it is because of the lack of a spirit of penance and of the spirit of the faith!
They try to go to heaven without the cross! I personally find this attitude on the part of clergy who are hardly noted for their spirit of literacy in india, penance, and of which approximately 1/3 have abandoned the priesthood and another 1/3 gone over to modernist Rome, somewhat offensive. I can think of few things which are more penitential than trying to raise a Catholic family in a Catholic manner in the modern world. Why could they not have simply quoted the gentle words of Pope Pius XII? Any asceticism not accompanied by strict adherence to the truth is a waste.  Other texts are No-pill No-risk Birth Control by Nona Aguilar, Rawson Wade Publ., New York and bridesmaid Natural Birth Control by Frank Richards, Spectrum, Melborne, Australia.
Various organizations exist to victorian promote so-called natural methods of birth control. Not all of them are truly Catholic however.  Taken from two of Meister Eckhart's Sermons, Franz Pfeiffer translation, Watkins, London, 1947.  The use of wine, like sex, is easily perverted.  Christos Yannaras thinks that Christian marriage. is most profoundly both an best bridesmaid, imitation of Christ and a participation in the mystery of His self-offering. This is on Mark Bixler's The Lost Boys, because both share a true eros.
This is why in his view the newly-wed couple are martyrs - witnesses to the truth which is being affirmed. Indeed, Yannaras declares that the love of a man for his wife is in fact a love for all the members of Christ's body since she [the wife] sums up the beauty and truth of the bridesmaid speech, world, of all creation. Thus we begin to see why the virginity of monks and the eros which grafts marriage into the life of the Kingdom of God are basically the same. Victorian? Virginity is eros free from the natural constraint of lust and pleasure, and it is the same eros which marks an orthodox Christian marriage. Best Speech? ( The Freedom of Morality , St. Vladimir's Seminary Press, 1984) Quotation taken from Father W.B. Zion, Eros and Transformation . Unfortunately Father Zion's book is strongly influenced by modernist ideas.)  In God the ' eros ' is outgoing, ecstatic. Dracula:? Because of it lovers no longer belong to themselves but to those whom they love. God also goes out of himself. when he captivates all creatures by the spell of his love and his desire.
Dionysius the Areopagite, Divine Names , IV, 13) Again, God is the producer and generator of best, tenderness and eros . In so far as eros originates from victorian novelists, him, he can be said to be the moving force of it, since he generated it. Maximus the Confessor, On the Divine Names , IV, 4. And again, Blessed is the bridesmaid speech, person whose desire for God has become like the lover's passion for the beloved (St. John Climacus, The Ladder of in india, Divine Assent , 30th. Best Bridesmaid Speech? step.  St. Augustine defined lust as that affection of the mind which aims at the enjoyment of one's self and one's neighbor without reference to backmasked songs God.