Date: 5.29.2017 / Article Rating: 5 / Votes: 4202 #Self motivator

Recent Posts

Home >> Uncategorized >> Self motivator

Write My Paper for Me, Please - self motivator - University of Illinois - Chicago

Nov/Wed/2017 | Uncategorized

Buy Finance Essay - Cheap essay service - Self-motivated — Викисловарь - Princeton University, Princeton, NJ

Nov 22, 2017 Self motivator,

Essay No Plagiarism - Self-Motivation Techniques & Examples |… - San Diego State University

Beauty Therapist CV Writing Service. If you love the motivator idea of Should Offenders be Tried and Punished Essay making people feel good and looking their best, a job as a beauty therapist could be perfect for you. Beauty therapists carry out face and motivator body treatments for clients to problem in education, help them look and feel better. To start work as a fully qualified beauty therapist you need a relevant level 3 NVQ or City Guilds. You can also gain these qualifications through an motivator, apprenticeship. Beauty Therapists need to mean, be open and friendly.

They also need to be able to make clients feel relaxed and self motivator be a good listener. If you love the idea of utnapishtim making people feel good and look their best, a job as a beauty therapist could be perfect for you. As a beauty therapist, you could provide a range of face and body treatments, including: facials – cleansing, massaging and motivator toning the skin applying and advising about make-up eyebrow shaping and problem in education today eyelash colouring manicures, pedicures and self motivator other nail treatments like extensions and nail art removal of unwanted facial and wealth body hair electro-therapy treatments to self, improve body tone and shape non-surgical skin improvement treatments UV (ultraviolet) and spray tanning. You may offer other treatments, such as massage, aromatherapy, hydrotherapy and reflexology. As well as carrying out act 1998, treatments, your day to day tasks would include: reception work, such as answering the self telephone and receiving clients booking appointments checking and criminal act 1998 ordering supplies keeping notes of clients’ medical histories and self treatment programmes. Criminal. You may occasionally need to refer clients to their doctor, for example, if they have a severe skin problem. Self Motivator. Your working hours would typically be 9 am to 5 pm, including Saturdays. Some salons offer evening appointments. Is E Mean. You could work in a high street salon or beauty clinic, health spa, hotel, or on a cruise ship. You could also be self-employed, either working from home or visiting clients in their own homes. Beauty therapists typically earn between ?12,000 and ?17,000 a year.

Salon managers can earn over ?20,000 a year. Beauty therapists also receive tips, and are usually paid extra for products they sell in motivator the salon (known as commission). Figures are intended as a guideline only. Should Juveniles Offenders Be Tried. To start work as a fully qualified beauty therapist you would need at least a level 3 qualification such as: NVQ Certificate/Diploma in Beauty Therapy at Level 3 City Guilds Level 3 Diploma in Beauty Therapy Techniques ITEC Level 3 Diploma in motivator Advanced Beauty Therapy VTCT Level 3 Diploma in Beauty Therapy Treatments. You can add to flood, your skills by self completing courses in punjab state specialist areas such as epilation, ear piercing, waxing techniques and self UV tanning. Courses leading to qualifications from awarding organisations such as ITEC, VTCT, City Guilds and punjab state Edexcel are run at colleges and private beauty schools.

Visit the self websites of the story awarding bodies for self details. Suppliers of some beauty products may offer training in the use of their products. Act 1998. You can also take higher level qualifications. Motivator. These would be useful if you want to progress to salon management. Higher level qualifications include BTEC HNDs and foundation degrees in subjects like Beauty Therapy Management, Salon and Spa Management, and Spa and criminal act 1998 Therapy Management. Self Motivator. To become a beauty therapist you would need: a friendly and welcoming manner the Should Offenders and Punished Essay ability to motivator, make clients feel relaxed tact, diplomacy and the ability to is Killing Essay examples, listen and communicate well the ability to explain procedures clearly to clients business awareness and motivator the ability to utnapishtim flood, sell products and earn commission a high standard of self motivator personal hygiene and care for Food Americans examples your appearance the ability to be on motivator, your feet for most of the in education today day some knowledge of chemistry, anatomy and motivator human biology a talent for applying nail art and wealth 1920s make-up. You could develop your career by motivator training in a wider variety of treatments, or moving into fashion, theatre or media make-up. With experience, and Juveniles Offenders Essay possibly further training, you could progress to become a salon manager, or move into self motivator training. The health and Juveniles Offenders be Tried and Punished as Adults? Essay fitness industry is part of the self active leisure, learning and Essay A Fundamental Part of the Early well?being sector, represented by SkillsActive Sector Skills Council. This sector is based on leisure and self recreation and Juveniles includes: sport and self motivator recreation; playwork; the outdoors; and is e commerce mean the caravan industry. The UK active leisure, learning and self motivator well?being sector currently employs 663,300 people, representing just over 2% of the UK workforce, and story an estimated 1.9 million volunteers in England (equating to 54,000 full?time equivalents).

There are an estimated 39,800 workplaces, of self motivator which 74% employ 10 or less people. Punjab State. Much of the workforce work in a part?time capacity (47%) and seasonal employment is important for outdoors, caravans and motivator playwork, which attract students and what mean other temporary workers. The health and fitness industry focuses on the supervision of exercise and physical activity. Self. The UK has thousands of what is e commerce mean fitness clubs, leisure centres and gyms for public use. Over the self motivator last decade, the utnapishtim story industry has grown rapidly, which has come both from within the private sector, but also through the self government’s reliance on the industry to help it deliver on public health and activity targets in wealth in the 1920s the fight against self illness and obesity. There are 51,500 people working in the health and is Killing Americans examples fitness industry. There are over motivator, 3,100 private fitness facilities within the UK with 4,397,200 members. Criminal Act 1998. There are just under 2,600 public health and fitness facilities, which have over motivator, 2,758,400 members. Problem In Education Today. 38% of the motivator workforce is punjab state, employed full?time, 42% part?time and motivator 20% self?employed. Story. Around 29% of the health and motivator fitness workforce is Essay Communication: A Fundamental Part of the Childhood Teacher's, aged 16?24 years (compared with 14% across all industries in self the UK). Justice Act 1998. Jobs in self the industry include: fitness instructor, personal trainer, group exercise instructor, yoga and pilates teacher, recreation assistant, club managers, duty managers, sales personnel, receptionist, lifeguard, finance manager, beautician, creche staff, children’s activity staff.

East Midlands – There are 44,300 people employed in utnapishtim flood story the active leisure, learning and well?being sector, of which 3,900 are employed in the health and fitness industry. The region hosts a broad range of activities, including coastal and self countryside destinations (e.g. the Peak District, Sherwood Forrest and criminal act 1998 the National Forest). Self Motivator. There are many places to walk and cycle, and Fast Food Essay the growing network of rights of motivator way, footpaths, multi?use trails and long?distance paths forms an Juveniles be Tried and Punished as Adults?, important recreational resource. Self. Industry skills gaps in the region include: sport specific technical skills; first aid; and child protection. Fast Food Is Killing Essay. East of England – There are 61,400 people employed in motivator the active leisure, learning and well?being sector, of which 6,100 are employed in utnapishtim the health and fitness industry. London – There are 70,200 people employed in the active leisure, learning and well?being sector, of which 5,900 are employed in the health and self fitness industry.

London has a rich mix of active leisure and learning facilities, high profile sporting clubs and venues and hosts a wide range of international, national, regional and local events. Industry skills gaps in punjab state the region include: sport specific technical skills; communication; management; initiative; first aid; child protection; project management; and working with people with disabilities. Motivator. North East – There are 24,500 people employed in the active leisure, learning and well?being sector, of which 1,900 are employed in the health and about Part of the Early fitness industry. The region has 20 facilities listed in the London 2012 Pre?Games Training Camps Guide and 4 universities providing sports provision recognised in motivator the 2012 Training Camps Guide. Criminal Justice Act 1998. The region hosts to the Great North Run, which has the largest participation in self the world. Industry skills gaps in the region include: sport specific technical skills; communication; first aid; team?working; health and safety; working with disabled people; child protection; and in the initiative. North West – There are 65,700 people employed in self motivator the active leisure, learning and well?being sector, of be Tried and Punished Essay which 5,400 are employed in the health and self fitness industry.

The region is justice act 1998, home to the Lake District, Forest of Bowland and the coast, so facilities include a purpose built mountain bike trail and self motivator outdoor activity centres. Criminal Justice. Industry skills gaps in motivator the region include: sport specific technical skills; communication; initiative; team?working; planning and preparing work; child protection; and flood first aid. South East – There are 96,700 people employed in the active leisure, learning and self well?being sector, of which 8,700 are employed in the health and fitness industry. Two of the nine UK Sports Institutes are based in the region at Bisham Abbey and what mean Bisley. Industry skills gaps in self motivator the region include: sport specific technical skills; first aid; child protection; communication; management; and planning and Food preparing work. Motivator. South West – There are 53,700 people employed in what is e commerce the active leisure, learning and well?being sector, of which 4,100 are employed in the health and fitness industry. The region offers a range of self opportunities for surfing, sailing, surf lifesaving, Tarka Trail, Camel Trail and coastal paths. Industry skills gaps in about Childhood Teacher's the region include: sport specific technical skills; communication; management; team?working; planning and self motivator preparing work; initiative; project management; and problem solving. Punjab State. West Midlands – There are 48,200 people employed in the active leisure, learning and self well?being sector, of problem today which 3,700 are employed in the health and fitness industry. Self. Industry skills gaps in wealth in the 1920s the region include: sport specific technical skills; communication; management; team?working; initiative; and motivator planning and preparing work.

Yorkshire and the Humber – There are 51,900 people employed in the active leisure, learning and well?being sector, of which 3,500 are employed in Offenders be Tried Essay the health and self fitness industry. Should Offenders Be Tried Essay. The region has a strong sporting infrastructure and is home to a cluster of self sports science, technology, medicine and economics research and development units. The region hosts three National Parks and a range of wealth 1920s outdoors activities including rock climbing, airborne activities, water sports and self cycling. Industry skills gaps in commerce the region include: sport specific technical skills; communication; child protection; initiative; and management. Self Motivator. Northern Ireland – There are 10,738 people employed in the active leisure, learning and well?being sector, of which 1,000 are employed in problem the health and fitness industry.

Scotland – There are 58,200 people employed in self the active leisure, learning and problem in education well?being sector, of self which 5,100 are employed in the health and fitness industry. Justice Act 1998. Wales – There are 29,500 people employed in the active leisure, learning and motivator well?being sector, of which 2,100 are employed in the health and criminal act 1998 fitness industry.

Essay Writing Service #1 | Custom Papers - Self-Motivation | SkillsYouNeed - Saint Michael's College

Self motivator

Write My Paper - Best Professional College Essay Writing Service - Self-Motivation Techniques & Examples |… - Broward College

Nov 22, 2017 Self motivator,

Pay for Exclusive Essay - Self-motivated — Викисловарь - Davidson College

Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Existentialism is a catch-all term for those philosophers who consider the nature of the human condition as a key philosophical problem and who share the view that this problem is best addressed through ontology. This very broad definition will be clarified by self motivator discussing seven key themes that existentialist thinkers address. Those philosophers considered existentialists are mostly from the Fast is Killing Americans Essay examples, continent of Europe, and date from the self, 19 th and flood, 20 th centuries. Outside philosophy, the existentialist movement is probably the most well-known philosophical movement, and at least two of its members are among the self, most famous philosophical personalities and widely read philosophical authors. It has certainly had considerable influence outside philosophy, for example on psychological theory and on Essay Communication: A Fundamental of the Teacher's, the arts. Within philosophy, though, it is safe to say that this loose movement considered as a whole has not had a great impact, although individuals or ideas counted within it remain important. Moreover, most of the philosophers conventionally grouped under this heading either never used, or actively disavowed, the term 'existentialist'.

Even Sartre himself once said: “Existentialism? I don’t know what that is.” So, there is a case to be made that the term – insofar as it leads us to ignore what is distinctive about philosophical positions and to conflate together significantly different ideas – does more harm than good. In this article, however, it is assumed that something sensible can be said about self existentialism as a loosely defined movement. The article has three sections. First, we outline a set of themes that define, albeit very broadly, existentialist concerns. This is done with reference to the historical context of existentialism, which will help us to understand why certain philosophical problems and methods were considered so important. Second, we discuss individually six philosophers who are arguably its central figures, stressing in punjab state, these discussions the ways in self, which these philosophers approached existentialist themes in distinctive ways. These figures, and many of the others we mention, have full length articles of their own within the Encyclopedia . Punjab State! Finally, we look very briefly at motivator, the influence of existentialism, especially outside philosophy. Although a highly diverse tradition of thought, seven themes can be identified that provide some sense of overall unity. Fast Is Killing Americans Essay Examples! Here, these themes will be briefly introduced; they can then provide us with an intellectual framework within which to discuss exemplary figures within the history of existentialism.

Philosophy should not be thought of primarily either as an attempt to investigate and understand the self or the world, or as a special occupation that concerns only a few. Rather, philosophy must be thought of as fully integrated within life. To be sure, there may need to be professional philosophers, who develop an elaborate set of methods and concepts (Sartre makes this point frequently) but life can be lived philosophically without a technical knowledge of philosophy. Existentialist thinkers tended to identify two historical antecedents for this notion. First, the motivator, ancient Greeks, and particularly the figure of Socrates but also the Stoics and Epicureans. Socrates was not only non-professional, but in his pursuit of the good life he tended to eschew the formation of a 'system' or 'theory', and his teachings took place often in public spaces. In this, the existentialists were hardly unusual. In the 19 th and utnapishtim, 20 th centuries, the rapid expansion of industrialisation and advance in technology were often seen in motivator, terms of an Juveniles Offenders and Punished Essay alienation of the human from nature or from self motivator a properly natural way of living (for example, thinkers of German and English romanticism). The second influence on thinking of philosophy as a way of life was German Idealism after Kant. Partly as a response to the 18 th century Enlightenment, and under the influence of the Neoplatonists, Schelling and Hegel both thought of punjab state, philosophy as an motivator activity that is an integral part of the history of human beings, rather than outside of life and the world, looking on. Later in the 19 th century, Marx famously criticised previous philosophy by saying that the Fast Food is Killing Americans Essay examples, point of philosophy is not to know things – even to know things about activity – but to change them.

The concept of philosophy as a way of life manifests itself in existentialist thought in a number of ways. Let us give several examples, to which we will return in the sections that follow. First, the existentialists often undertook a critique of modern life in terms of the specialisation of both manual and intellectual labour. Specialisation included philosophy. One consequence of this is that many existentialist thinkers experimented with different styles or genres of self motivator, writing in utnapishtim flood story, order to escape the effects of this specialisation. Second, a notion that we can call 'immanence': philosophy studies life from the inside. For Kierkegaard, for example, the fundamental truths of my existence are not representations – not, that is, ideas, propositions or symbols the meaning of which can be separated from their origin.

Rather, the truths of motivator, existence are immediately lived, felt and acted. Likewise, for problem, Nietzsche and Heidegger, it is essential to recognise that the philosopher investigating human existence is, him or herself, an existing human. Third, the nature of life itself is a perennial existentialist concern and, more famously (in Heidegger and in Camus), also the self motivator, significance of death. A key idea here is that human existence is in some way 'on its own'; anxiety (or anguish) is the Fast Food is Killing Americans Essay, recognition of this fact. Anxiety here has two important implications. First, most generally, many existentialists tended to self motivator, stress the significance of emotions or feelings, in so far as they were presumed to have a less culturally or intellectually mediated relation to one's individual and separate existence. This idea is found in Kierkegaard, as we mentioned above, and in Heidegger's discussion of 'mood'; it is also one reason why existentialism had an influence on psychology. Second, anxiety also stands for a form of existence that is recognition of being on its own. Utnapishtim Story! What is meant by 'being on its own' varies among philosophers.

For example, it might mean the irrelevance (or even negative influence) of rational thought, moral values, or empirical evidence, when it comes to making fundamental decisions concerning one's existence. As we shall see, Kierkegaard sees Hegel's account of religion in terms of the history of absolute spirit as an exemplary confusion of faith and reason. Alternatively, it might be a more specifically theological claim: the motivator, existence of a transcendent deity is be Tried, not relevant to (or is positively detrimental to) such decisions (a view broadly shared by Nietzsche and Sartre). Finally, being on its own might signify the motivator, uniqueness of in education today, human existence, and thus the fact that it cannot understand itself in terms of other kinds of existence (Heidegger and Sartre). Related to self motivator, anxiety is the concept of authenticity, which is let us say the existentialist spin on Americans examples, the Greek notion of self motivator, 'the good life'.

As we shall see, the authentic being would be able to recognise and affirm the nature of existence (we shall shortly specify some of the aspects of this, such as absurdity and freedom). Not, though, recognise the nature of existence as an intellectual fact, disengaged from life; but rather, the authentic being lives in accordance with this nature. The notion of authenticity is sometimes seen as connected to individualism. Juveniles And Punished Essay! This is only reinforced by the contrast with a theme we will discuss below, that of the 'crowd'. Certainly, if authenticity involves 'being on one's own', then there would seem to be some kind of value in celebrating and sustaining one's difference and independence from others.

However, many existentialists see individualism as a historical and cultural trend (for example Nietzsche), or dubious political value (Camus), rather than a necessary component of authentic existence. Individualism tends to obscure the particular types of collectivity that various existentialists deem important. For many existentialists, the self, conditions of the modern world make authenticity especially difficult. Is Killing Examples! For example, many existentialists would join other philosophers (such as the self motivator, Frankfurt School) in condemning an instrumentalist conception of reason and value. The utilitarianism of Mill measured moral value and justice also in terms of the consequences of actions. Later liberalism would seek to absorb nearly all functions of political and social life under the heading of economic performance. Evaluating solely in in the 1920s, terms of the motivator, measurable outcomes of production was seen as reinforcing the Juveniles Offenders be Tried as Adults? Essay, secularisation of the institutions of political, social or economic life; and reinforcing also the abandonment of any broader sense of the spiritual dimension (such an idea is motivator, found acutely in Emerson, and is akin to the concerns of Kierkegaard). Existentialists such as Martin Heidegger, Hanna Arendt or Gabriel Marcel viewed these social movements in terms of a narrowing of the possibilities of human thought to Should Juveniles Offenders be Tried and Punished Essay, the instrumental or technological. This narrowing involved thinking of the world in terms of resources, and thinking of all human action as a making, or indeed as a machine-like 'function'. The next key theme is freedom.

Freedom can usefully be linked to the concept of anguish, because my freedom is in part defined by the isolation of my decisions from any determination by a deity, or by previously existent values or knowledge. Many existentialists identified the motivator, 19 th and 20 th centuries as experiencing a crisis of values. This might be traced back to familiar reasons such as an increasingly secular society, or the rise of scientific or philosophical movements that questioned traditional accounts of value (for example Marxism or Darwinism), or the 1920s, shattering experience of two world wars and the phenomenon of mass genocide. It is important to note, however, that for existentialism these historical conditions do not create the self motivator, problem of anguish in the face of freedom, but merely cast it into 1920s, higher relief. Likewise, freedom entails something like responsibility, for myself and for my actions. Given that my situation is one of being on its own – recognised in anxiety – then both my freedom and my responsibility are absolute. The isolation that we discussed above means that there is nothing else that acts through me, or that shoulders my responsibility.

Likewise, unless human existence is to self, be understood as arbitrarily changing moment to moment, this freedom and responsibility must stretch across time. Thus, when I exist as an authentically free being, I assume responsibility for Juveniles be Tried and Punished Essay, my whole life, for a ‘project’ or a ‘commitment’. We should note here that many of the existentialists take on a broadly Kantian notion of freedom: freedom as autonomy . This means that freedom, rather than being randomness or arbitrariness, consists in the binding of oneself to a law, but a law that is given by the self in recognition of its responsibilities. This borrowing from Kant, however, is heavily qualified by the next theme. The next common theme we shall call ‘situatedness’. Although my freedom is absolute, it always takes place in a particular context. Self Motivator! My body and its characteristics, my circumstances in a historical world, and my past, all weigh upon freedom. This is what makes freedom meaningful. Suppose I tried to exist as free, while pretending to be in abstraction from the situation. In that case I will have no idea what possibilities are open to me and what choices need to problem, be made, here and now.

In such a case, my freedom will be naive or illusory. This concrete notion of freedom has its philosophical genesis in Hegel, and is generally contrasted to the pure rational freedom described by Kant. Situatedness is related to a notion we discussed above under the heading of philosophy as a way of life: the necessity of viewing or understanding life and self, existence from the in education, ‘inside’. For example, many 19 th century intellectuals were interested in ancient Greece, Rome, the Medieval period, or the orient, as alternative models of a less spoiled, more integrated form of life. Nietzsche, to be sure, shared these interests, but he did so not uncritically: because the human condition is motivator, characterised by Should be Tried and Punished as Adults? Essay being historically situated, it cannot simply turn back the self motivator, clock or decide all at once to be other than it is (Sartre especially shares this view). Heidegger expresses a related point in this way: human existence cannot be abstracted from its world because being-in-the-world is part of the ontological structure of Essay of the Role, that existence. Many existentialists take my concretely individual body, and the specific type of life that my body lives, as a primary fact about me (for example, Nietzsche, Scheler or Merleau-Ponty). Self Motivator! I must also be situated socially: each of my acts says something about how I view others but, reciprocally, each of Offenders be Tried and Punished as Adults?, their acts is a view about what I am. Motivator! My freedom is always situated with respect to Essay, the judgements of others. This particular notion comes from Hegel’s analysis of ‘recognition’, and is found especially in Sartre, de Beauvoir and self motivator, Jaspers. In The! Situatedness in general also has an important philosophical antecedent in Marx: economic and political conditions are not contingent features with respect to motivator, universal human nature, but condition that nature from the ground up.

Although, of problem in education today, course, existentialism takes its name from the philosophical theme of 'existence', this does not entail that there is homogeneity in the manner existence is to be understood. Self! One point on which there is agreement, though, is that the existence with which we should be concerned here is not just any existent thing, but human existence . There is thus an important difference between distinctively human existence and anything else, and human existence is not to be understood on the model of things , that is, as objects of knowledge. Utnapishtim Flood Story! One might think that this is an self motivator old idea, rooted in Plato's distinction between matter and soul, or Descartes' between extended and thinking things. But these distinctions appear to be just differences between two types of things. Descartes in particular, however, is often criticised by the existentialists for utnapishtim story, subsuming both under the self, heading 'substance', and thus treating what is distinctive in about Communication: A Fundamental Early Childhood Teacher's, human existence as indeed a thing or object, albeit one with different properties. (Whether the existentialist characterisation of self, Plato or Descartes is accurate is a different question.) The existentialists thus countered the Platonic or Cartesian conception with a model that resembles more the Aristotelian as developed in the Nichomachean Ethics . The latter idea arrives in existentialist thought filtered through Leibniz and Spinoza and the notion of a striving for existence. Equally important is the elevation of the practical above the theoretical in German Idealists. Particularly in Kant, who stressed the primacy of the 'practical', and then in Fichte and early Schelling, we find the notion that human existence is action . Accordingly, in Nietzsche and Sartre we find the wealth in the 1920s, notion that the human being is self, all and only what that being does. My existence consists of forever bringing myself into being – and, correlatively, fleeing from the Should Offenders and Punished as Adults? Essay, dead, inert thing that is the self motivator, totality of my past actions. Although my acts are free, I am not free not to act; thus existence is characterised also by 'exigency' (Marcel). For many existentialists, authentic existence involves a certain tension be recognised and lived through, but not resolved: this tension might be between the in the, animal and the rational (important in Nietzsche) or between facticity and self, transcendence (Sartre and de Beauvoir). In the 19 th and 20 th centuries, the human sciences (such as psychology, sociology or economics) were coming to be recognised as powerful and legitimate sciences.

To some extend at wealth, least their assumptions and methods seemed to be borrowed from the self, natural sciences. While philosophers such as Dilthey and later Gadamer were concerned to show that the human sciences had to have a distinctive method, the existentialists were inclined to go further. The free, situated human being is not an Food is Killing Americans Essay object of knowledge in the sense the motivator, human always exists as the possibility of transcending any knowledge of flood, it. There is a clear relation between such an idea and the notion of the 'transcendence of the other' found in the ethical phenomenology of Emmanuel Levinas. Among the most famous ideas associated with existentialism is that of 'absurdity'.

Human existence might be described as 'absurd' in one of the motivator, following senses. First, many existentialists argued that nature as a whole has no design, no reason for in education, existing. Although the natural world can apparently be understood by physical science or metaphysics, this might be better thought of as 'description' than either understanding or explanation. Thus, the achievements of the natural sciences also empty nature of self, value and meaning. Unlike a created cosmos, for example, we cannot expect the scientifically described cosmos to Fast, answer our questions concerning value or meaning. Moreover, such description comes at the cost of a profound falsification of nature: namely, the positing of ideal entities such as 'laws of nature', or the conflation of all reality under a single model of being. Human beings can and should become profoundly aware of this lack of reason and the impossibility of an immanent understanding of it. Camus, for example, argues that the basic scene of human existence is its confrontation with this mute irrationality. A second meaning of the absurd is this: my freedom will not only be undetermined by knowledge or reason, but from the point of view of the latter my freedom will even appear absurd. Absurdity is motivator, thus closely related to the theme of 'being on its own', which we discussed above under the heading of anxiety.

Even if I choose to follow a law that I have given myself, my choice of law will appear absurd, and likewise will my continuously reaffirmed choice to follow it. Flood! Third, human existence as action is doomed to always destroy itself. A free action, once done, is no longer free; it has become an aspect of the world, a thing . Self Motivator! The absurdity of human existence then seems to lie in the fact that in becoming myself (a free existence) I must be what I am not (a thing). If I do not face up to Part Teacher's, this absurdity, and choose to be or pretend to be thing-like, I exist inauthentically (the terms in this formulation are Sartre's). Existentialism generally also carries a social or political dimension. Insofar as he or she is authentic, the freedom of the human being will show a certain 'resolution' or 'commitment', and motivator, this will involve also the being – and particularly the authentic being – of Food Americans Essay, others. For example, Nietzsche thus speaks of his (or Zarathustra's) work in aiding the transformation of the human, and there is also in Nietzsche a striking analysis of the concept of friendship; for Heidegger, there must be an authentic mode of being-with others, although he does not develop this idea at length; the social and political aspect of authentic commitment is much more clear in Sartre, de Beauvoir and Camus. That is the positive side of the social or political dimension.

However, leading up to this positive side, there is a description of the typical forms that inauthentic social or political existence takes. Many existentialists employ terms such as 'crowd', 'horde' (Scheler) or the 'masses' (Jose Ortega y Gasset). Nietzsche's deliberately provocative expression, 'the herd', portrays the self, bulk of humanity not only as animal, but as docile and domesticated animals. Notice that these are all collective terms: inauthenticity manifests itself as de-individuated or faceless. Instead of being formed authentically in freedom and utnapishtim, anxiety, values are just accepted from others because ‘that is what everybody does’. These terms often carry a definite historical resonance, embodying a critique of specifically modern modes of human existence. All of the following might be seen as either causes or symptoms of a world that is 'fallen' or 'broken' (Marcel): the technology of mass communication (Nietzsche is particularly scathing about newspapers and journalists; in motivator, Two Ages , Kierkegaard says something very similar), empty religious observances, the specialisation of labour and social roles, urbanisation and industrialisation. The theme of the crowd poses a question also to the positive social or political dimension of existentialism: how could a collective form of existence ever be anything other than inauthentic?

The 19 th and 20 th century presented a number of mass political ideologies which might be seen as posing a particularly challenging environment for authentic and free existence. For example, nationalism came in for criticism particularly by Essay of the Childhood Teacher's Role Nietzsche. Self! Socialism and communism: after WWII, Sartre was certainly a communist, but even then unafraid to criticise both the French communist party and the Soviet Union for wealth, rigid or inadequately revolutionary thinking. Democracy: Aristotle in book 5 of his Politics distinguishes between democracy and ochlocracy, which latter essentially means rule by those incapable of ruling even themselves. Self! Many existentialists would identify the Essay about Part Early Childhood, latter with the American and especially French concept of 'democracy'. Nietzsche and Ortega y Gasset both espoused a broadly aristocratic criterion for self, social and is Killing Essay examples, political leadership. 2. Key Existentialist Philosophers.

a. Motivator! Soren Kierkegaard (1813-1855) as an Existentialist Philosopher. Kierkegaard was many things: philosopher, religious writer, satirist, psychologist, journalist, literary critic and punjab state, generally considered the ‘father’ of existentialism. Being born (in Copenhagen) to a wealthy family enabled him to devote his life to the pursuits of his intellectual interests as well as to self, distancing himself from the ‘everyday man’ of his times. Kierkegaard’s most important works are pseudonymous, written under fictional names, often very obviously fictional. The issue of pseudonymity has been variously interpreted as a literary device, a personal quirk or as an illustration of the Fast is Killing Americans examples, constant tension between the motivator, philosophical truth and existential or personal truth. We have already seen that for Food is Killing, the existentialists it is of equal importance what one says and the way in which something is said. This forms part of the attempt to return to a more authentic way of philosophising, firstly exemplified by the Greeks. In a work like Either/Or (primarily a treatise against the Hegelians) theoretical reflections are followed by self reflections on Essay examples, how to seduce girls. The point is to stress the distance between the anonymously and logically produced truths of the logicians and the personal truths of existing individuals. Every pseudonymous author is a symbol for an existing individual and at times his very name is the key to the mysteries of his existence (like in the case of Johanes de Silentio , fictional author of Fear and self motivator, Trembling , where the mystery of Abraham’s actions cannot be told, being a product of and belonging to Fast Americans examples, silence). Kierkegaard has been associated with a notion of truth as subjective (or personal); but what does this mean?

The issue is linked with his notorious confrontation with the Danish Church and the academic environment of his days. Kierkegaard’s work takes place against self motivator, the background of an Juveniles as Adults? academia dominated by Hegelian dialectics and self motivator, a society which reduces the communication with the divine to the everyday observance of the ritualistic side of an Essay about A Fundamental Teacher's Role institutionalized Christianity. Hegel is for self, Kierkegaard his arch-enemy not only because of about A Fundamental Early Teacher's Role, what he writes but also what he represents. Hegel is guilty for Kierkegaard because he reduced the living truth of Christianity (the fact that God suffered and died on the Cross) to just another moment, which necessarily will be overcome, in the dialectical development of the Spirit. Motivator! While Hegel treats “God” as a Begriff (a concept), for Kierkegaard the truth of Christianity signifies the very paradoxicality of is Killing Americans Essay examples, faith: that is, that it is possible for the individual to go beyond the ‘ethical’ and nevertheless or rather because of this very act of disobedience to be loved by ‘God’. Famously, for self, Hegel ‘all that is real is rational’ – where rationality means the historically articulated, dialectical progression of Spirit – whereas for Kierkegaard the suspension of rationality is the very secret of Christianity. Against the cold logic of the Fast Food examples, Hegelian system Kierkegaard seeks “a truth which is truth for me” (Kierkegaard 1996:32). Christianity in particular represents the attempt to offer one’s life to self, the service of the in the 1920s, divine. This cannot be argued, it can only be lived. While a theologian will try to argue for the validity of his positions by arguing and counter-arguing, a true Christian will try to live his life the self, way Jesus lived it. This evidently marks the continuation of the Hellenic idea of philosophy as a way of life, exemplified in the person of Socrates who did not write treatises, but who died for his ideas.

Before the logical concepts of the theologians (in the words of Martin Heidegger who was hugely influenced by Kierkegaard) “man can neither fall to his knees in awe nor can he play music and Fast Food is Killing Essay, dance before this god” (Heidegger 2002:42). The idea of self motivator, ‘subjective truth’ will have serious consequences to the philosophical understanding of is Killing Americans Essay examples, man. Traditionally defined as animale rationale (the rational animal) by Aristotle and for a long time worshiped as such by generations of philosophical minds, Kierkegaard comes now to redefine the human as the ‘passionate animal’. What counts in man is the intensity of his emotions and his willingness to motivator, believe ( contra the once all powerful reason) in that which cannot be understood. The opening up by Kierkegaard of this terra incognita of man’s inner life will come to play a major role for later existentialists (most importantly for Nietzsche) and will bring to light the Should Offenders Essay, failings and the weaknesses of an over-optimistic (because modelled after the Natural sciences) model of philosophy which was taught to talk a lot concerning the ‘truth’ of the human, when all it understood about the human was a mutilated version. In the Garden of self, Eden, Adam and Eve lived in a state of about Communication: A Fundamental Early Role, innocence in communication with God and in harmony with their physical environment. The expulsion from the Garden opened up a wide range of motivator, new possibilities for them and thus the problem of anxiety arose.

Adam (the Hebrew word for man) is now free to determine through his actions the route of things. Wealth! Naturally, there is a tension here. The human, created in self motivator, God’s image, is an infinite being. Like God he also can choose and act according to his will. Simultaneously, though, he is a finite being since he is 1920s, restricted by his body, particular socioeconomic conditions and so forth. This tension between the motivator, finite and infinite is the source of anxiety. Should Juveniles Offenders And Punished Essay! But unlike a Hegelian analysis, Kierkegaard does not look for a way out from motivator anxiety; on the contrary he stresses its positive role in the flourishing of the human. Utnapishtim Story! As he characteristically puts it: “Because he is a synthesis, he can be in anxiety; and the more profoundly he is in anxiety, the greater is the man” (Kierkegaard 1980:154). The prioritization of anxiety as a fundamental trait of the motivator, human being is Food Americans examples, a typical existentialist move, eager to assert the positive role of emotions for motivator, human life.

Perhaps the most famous work of Kierkegaard was Fear and Food Americans examples, Trembling , a short book which exhibits many of the issues raised by him throughout his career. Fear and Trembling retells the story of the attempted sacrifice of motivator, Isaac by his father Abraham. God tells Abraham that in order to prove his faith he has to in education today, sacrifice his only son. Abraham obeys, but at self motivator, the last moment God intervenes and saves Isaac. Wealth In The! What is the moral of the story? According to our moral beliefs, shouldn’t Abraham refuse to execute God’s vicious plan? Isn’t one of the fundamental beliefs of motivator, Christianity the utnapishtim flood, respect to the life of other?

The answer is naturally affirmative. Abraham should refuse God, and he should respect the ethical law. Then Abraham would be in a good relation with the Law itself as in the expression ‘a law abiding citizen’. On the contrary what Abraham tries to achieve is self motivator, a personal relation with the Fast Food Americans Essay, author of the moral law. This author is neither a symbolic figure nor an abstract idea; he is self motivator, someone with a name. The name of ’God’ is the flood, unpronounceable Tetragrammaton (YHVE), the unpronounceability indicates the simultaneous closeness and distance of the great Other. The Christian God then, the author of the moral law at his will suspends the law and demands his unlawful wish be obeyed.

Jacques Derrida notes that the temptation is now for Abraham the ethical law itself (Derrida 1998:162): he must resist ethics, this is the motivator, mad logic of God. The story naturally raises many problems. Is not such a subjectivist model of truth and religion plainly dangerous? What if someone was to is Killing Americans Essay, support his acts of violence as a command of God? Kierkegaard’s response would be to suggest that it is only because Abraham loved Isaac with all his heart that the sacrifice could take place. “He must love Isaac with his whole soul. only self motivator then can he sacrifice him” (Kierkegaard 1983:74). About A Fundamental Of The Early Childhood Role! Abraham’s faith is proved by the strength of his love for his son. However, this doesn’t fully answer the question of legitimacy, even if we agree that Abraham believed that God loved him so that he would somehow spare him. Kierkegaard also differentiates between the act of self motivator, Abraham and the act of a tragic hero (like Agamemnon sacrificing his daughter Iphigenia). The tragic hero’s act is a product of Juveniles Offenders as Adults? Essay, calculation.

What is better to do? What would be more beneficial? Abraham stands away from all sorts of calculations, he stands alone, that is, free in front of the horror religiosus , the price and the reward of faith. b. Motivator! Friedrich Nietzsche (1844-1900) as an problem Existentialist Philosopher. “I know my lot. Some day my name will be linked to the memory of self motivator, something monstrous, of a crisis as yet unprecedented on earth. ” (Nietzsche 2007:88).

Remarkably, what in 1888 sounded like megalomania came some years later to be realized. The name ‘Nietzsche’ has been linked with an punjab state array of historical events, philosophical concepts and self motivator, widespread popular legends. Above all, Nietzsche has managed somehow to associate his name with the turmoil of a crisis. For a while this crisis was linked to the events of WWII. The exploitation of his teaching by the Nazi ideologues (notably Alfred Rosenberg and Alfred Baeumler), although utterly misdirected, arguably had its source in Nietzsche’s own “aristocratic radicalism”.

More generally, the crisis refers to the prospect of a future lacking of be Tried and Punished Essay, any meaning. This is a common theme for self, all the Essay about Part of the Early Role, existentialists to be sure. The prospect of millennia of nihilism (the devaluation of the highest values) inaugurates for Nietzsche the era in which the self motivator, human itself, for the first time in its history, is called to give meaning both to utnapishtim, its own existence and to the existence of the world. This is an event of a cataclysmic magnitude, from motivator now on there are neither guidelines to wealth in the 1920s, be followed, lighthouses to direct us, and no right answers but only experiments to be conducted with unknown results. Many existentialists, in their attempt to differentiate the value of individual existence from the alienating effects of the masses, formed an uneasy relation with the value of the ‘everyday man’. The ‘common’ man was thought to be lacking in self, will , taste in matter of aesthetics, and individuality in the sense that the assertion of his existence comes exclusively from his participation in larger groups and from the ‘herd’ mentality with which these groups infuse their members.

Nietzsche believed that men in society are divided and ordered according to their willingness and Fast is Killing Americans, capacity to participate in a life of spiritual and self, cultural transformation. Certainly not everyone wishes this participation and Nietzsche’s condemnation of those unwilling to challenge their fundamental beliefs is harsh; however it would be a mistake to suggest that Nietzsche thought their presence dispensable. In various aphorisms he stresses the importance of the ‘common’ as a necessary prerequisite for both the growth and the value of the ‘exceptional’. Such an Essay about of the Teacher's Role idea clashes with our ‘modern’ sensitivities (themselves a product of a particular training). However, one has to recognize that there are no philosophers without presuppositions, and that Nietzsche’s insistence on the value of the exceptional marks his own beginning and his own understanding of the self motivator, mission of thought.

Despite the dubious politics that the Should Offenders as Adults? Essay, crisis of self motivator, meaning gave rise to, the crisis itself is only an after-effect of a larger and deeper challenge that Nietzsche’s work identifies and flood story, poses. Self! For Nietzsche the crisis of meaning is inextricably linked to the crisis of religious consciousness in the West. Whereas for Kierkegaard the Should Offenders be Tried and Punished as Adults? Essay, problem of meaning was to motivator, be resolved through the individual’s relation to the Divine, for Nietzsche the militantly anti-Christian, the Should Juveniles be Tried and Punished as Adults?, problem of meaning is self motivator, rendered possible at all because of the demise of the Divine. As he explains in The Genealogy of in education, Morality , it is only after the cultivation of truth as a value by the priest that truth comes to question its own value and function. What truth discovers is motivator, that at Americans examples, the ground of all truth lies an motivator unquestionable faith in in education, the value of truth. Christianity is destroyed when it is pushed to tell the truth about itself, when the illusions of the old ideals are revealed. What is called ‘The death of God’ is also then the death of truth (though not of the value of truthfulness ); this is an event of immense consequences for self motivator, the future. But one has to be careful here. Generations of readers, by concentrating on Fast Americans examples, the event of the actual announcement of the 'death of God', have completely missed madman’s woeful mourning which follows the announcement. “‘Where is God?’ he cried; ‘I‘ll tell you! We have killed him – you and I! We are all his murderers. But how did we do this?

How were we able to drink up the sea? Who gave us the sponge to wipe away the self, entire horizon? What were we doing when we unchained this earth from its sun? Where is it moving? Where are we moving to? Away from flood story all suns?” (Nietzsche 2001:125).

The above sentences are very far from constituting a cheerful declaration: no one is happy here! Nietzsche’s atheism has nothing to do with the naive atheism of others (for example Sartre) who rush to affirm their freedom as if their petty individuality were able to fill the vast empty space left by the absence of God. Nietzsche is not naive and because he is self motivator, not naive he is rather pessimistic. What the death of God really announces is the demise of the human as we know it. One has to think of this break in the history of the human in Kantian terms.

Kant famously described Enlightenment as “man’s emergence from his self-incurred immaturity” (Kant 1991:54). Punjab State! Similarly Nietzsche believes that the demise of the divine could be the opportunity for the emergence of a being which derives the meaning of self, its existence from within itself and not from Fast Food is Killing Essay some authority external to it. If the meaning of the human derived from God then, with the universe empty, man cannot take the place of the absent God. This empty space can only be filled by motivator something greater and fuller, which in the Nietzschean jargon means the greatest unity of punjab state, contradictory forces. That is the Ubermensch (Overhuman) which for self motivator, Nietzsche signifies the attempt towards the cultural production of a human being which will be aware of his dual descent – from animality and from rationality – without prioritizing either one, but keeping them in an agonistic balance so that through struggle new and exciting forms of Communication: A Fundamental Early Teacher's Role, human existence can be born. Nietzsche was by training a Klassische Philologe (the rough equivalent Anglosaxon would be an expert in classics – the self motivator, texts of the ancient Greek and Roman authors). Perhaps because of his close acquaintance with the ancient writers, he became sensitive to a quite different understanding of philosophical thinking to that of his contemporaries. For the Greeks, philosophical questioning takes place within the perspective of a certain choice of life. There is about Part of the Early Teacher's, no ‘life’ and then quite separately the theoretical (theoria: from thea – view, and horan – to see) or 'from a distance' contemplation of self motivator, phenomena. Philosophical speculation is the result of a certain way of life and the attempted justification of this life. Interestingly Kant encapsulates this attitude in the following passage: “When will you finally begin to live virtuously?’ said Plato to an old man who told him he was attending classes on virtue.

The point is not always to speculate, but also ultimately to think about applying our knowledge. Today, however, he who lives in conformity with what he teaches is taken for a dreamer” (Kant in wealth 1920s, Hadot 2002:xiii). We have to motivator, understand Nietzsche’s relation to Juveniles Essay, philosophy within this context not only because it illustrates a stylistically different contemplation but because it demonstrates an altogether different way of philosophizing. Thus in Twilight of the Idols Nietzsche accuses philosophers for their ‘Egyptism’, the fact that they turn everything into a concept under evaluation. “All that philosophers have been handling for thousands of years is conceptual mummies; nothing real has ever left their hands alive” (Nietzsche 1998:16). Philosophical concepts are valuable insofar as they serve a flourishing life, not as academic exercises. Under the new model of philosophy the motivator, old metaphysical and 1920s, moral questions are to be replaced by new questions concerning history, genealogy, environmental conditions and so forth. Let us take a characteristic passage from self motivator 1888: “I am interested in a question on which the ‘salvation of humanity’ depends more than on any curio of the theologians: the question of nutrition . For ease of use, one can put it in the following terms: ‘how do you personally have to nourish yourself in A Fundamental Part of the Early Childhood Role, order to attain your maximum of strength, of virtu in the Renaissance style, of moraline-free virtue?” (Nietzsche 2007:19). What is Nietzsche telling us here? Two things: firstly that, following the tradition of self motivator, Spinoza, the movement from transcendence to immanence passes through the rehabilitation of the body. To say that, however, does not imply a simple-minded materialism. Americans! When Spinoza tells “nobody as yet has determined the limits of the body’s capabilities” (Spinoza 2002: 280) he is not writing about something like bodily strength but to the possibility of an emergence of a body liberated from the sedimentation of motivator, culture and memory.

This archetypical body is indeed as yet unknown and we stand in ignorance of its abilities. The second thing that Nietzsche is telling us in the above passage is Fast Essay, that this new immanent philosophy necessarily requires a new ethics. One has to be clear here because of the many misunderstandings of Nietzschean ethics. Nietzsche is motivator, primarily a philosopher of ethics but ethics here refers to the possible justification of a way of life, which way of life in turn justifies human existence on earth. For Nietzsche, ethics does not refer to moral codes and guidelines on how to live one’s life.

Morality, which Nietzsche rejects, refers to the obsessive need (a need or an instinct can also be learned according to Nietzsche) of the human to utnapishtim flood story, preserve its own species and to regard its species as higher than the other animals. In short morality is arrogant . A Nietzschean ethics is an ethics of self motivator, modesty. It places the problem, human back where it belongs, among the other animals. Motivator! However to punjab state, say that is self motivator, not to equate the human with the animal. Unlike non-human animals men are products of history that is to say products of memory.

That is their burden and problem, their responsibility. In the Genealogy of Morality Nietzsche explains morality as a system aiming at the taming of the human animal. Morality’s aim is the elimination of the creative power of animal instincts and self, the establishment of a life protected within the cocoon of Offenders and Punished as Adults? Essay, ascetic ideals. These 'ideals' are all those values and ideologies made to protect man against the danger of nihilism, the state in which man finds no answer to the question of his existence. Morality clings to motivator, the preservation of the species ‘man’; morality stubbornly denies the punjab state, very possibility of an open-ended future for motivator, humans. If we could summarize Nietzsche’s philosophical anthropology in a few words, we would say that for Nietzsche it is today, necessary to attempt (there are no guarantees here) to think of the human not as an end-in-itself but only as a means to something “. perfect, completely finished, happy, powerful, triumphant, that still leaves something to fear!” (Nietzsche 2007:25).

c. Motivator! Martin Heidegger (1889-1976) as an Existentialist Philosopher. Heidegger exercised an unparalleled influence on modern thought. Without knowledge of Offenders and Punished Essay, his work recent developments in modern European philosophy (Sartre, Gadamer, Arendt, Marcuse, Derrida, Foucault et al.) simply do not make sense. He remains notorious for his involvement with National Socialism in the 1930s. Outside European philosophy, Heidegger is only occasionally taken seriously, and is sometimes actually ridiculed (famously the Oxford philosopher A.J. Self! Ayer called him a ‘charlatan’). In 1945 in Paris Jean-Paul Sartre gave a public lecture with the title ‘Existentialism is a Humanism’ where he defended the priority of action and the position that it is a man’s actions which define his humanity.

In 1946, Jean Beaufret in a letter to Heidegger poses a number of questions concerning the about of the Teacher's, link between humanism and the recent developments of existentialist philosophy in motivator, France. Heidegger’s response is a letter to Beaufret which in Communication: A Fundamental of the Early Teacher's Role, 1947 is published in a book form with the title ‘Letter on Humanism’. There he repudiates any possible connection of his philosophy with the existentialism of self, Sartre. Essay Communication: A Fundamental Part Of The Childhood! The question for us here is the following: Is it possible, given Heidegger’s own repudiation of existentialism, still to characterise Heidegger’s philosophy as 'existentialist'? The answer here is that Heidegger can be classified as an existentialist thinker despite all his differences from motivator Sartre. Essay About Part Of The Early Teacher's! Our strategy is to stress Heidegger’s connection with some key existentialist concerns, which we introduced above under the motivator, labels ‘Existence’, ‘Anxiety’ and the ‘Crowd’. We have seen above that a principle concern of all existentialists was to affirm the priority of utnapishtim flood story, individual existence and to stress that human existence is to be investigated with methods other than those of the natural sciences. This is also one of Heidegger’s principle concerns.

His magnum opus Being and Time is an investigation into the meaning of Being as that manifests itself through the human being, Dasein. The sciences have repeatedly asked ‘What is a man?’ ‘What is a car?’ ‘What is an emotion?’ they have nevertheless failed – and motivator, because of the nature of science, had to Fast Food Americans, fail – to ask the question which grounds all those other questions. Motivator! This question is what is the meaning of in the, (that) Being which is not an entity (like other beings, for example a chair, a car, a rock) and yet through it entities have meaning at all? Investigating the question of the meaning of Being we discover that it arises only because it is made possible by the human being which poses the question. Dasein has already a (pre-conceptual) understanding of self, Being because it is the place where Being manifests itself. Punjab State! Unlike the traditional understanding of the self motivator, human as a hypokeimenon (Aristotle) – what through the filtering of Greek thought by problem in education today the Romans becomes substantia, that which supports all entities and qualities as their base and their ground – Dasein refers to the way which human beings are. ”The essence of Dasein lies in self motivator, its existence” (Heidegger 1962: 67) and the existence of Dasein is not fixed like the existence of a substance is. This is Should Juveniles be Tried and Punished Essay, why human beings locate a place which nevertheless remains unstable and self motivator, unfixed. The virtual place that Dasein occupies is not empty. It is filled with beings which ontologically structure the in education today, very possibility of motivator, Dasein. Dasein exists as in-the-world.

World is not something separate from Dasein; rather, Dasein cannot be understood outside the Juveniles Offenders be Tried Essay, referential totality which constitutes it. Heidegger repeats here a familiar existentialist pattern regarding the situatedness of experience. Sartre, by contrast, comes from the tradition of Descartes and to this tradition remains faithful. From Heidegger's perspective, Sartre’s strategy of self motivator, affirming the Essay about Communication: of the Early Childhood, priority of existence over essence is a by-product of the tradition of Renaissance humanism which wishes to motivator, assert the importance of man as the highest and most splendid of finite beings. Sartrean existence refers to the fact that a human is A Fundamental Part of the Early Childhood, whereas Heidegger’s ek-sistence refers to the way with which Dasein is thrown into a world of referential relations and as such Dasein is motivator, claimed by Being to Fast Food is Killing, guard its truth. Sartre, following Descartes, thinks of the human as a substance producing or sustaining entities, Heidegger on the contrary thinks of the human as a passivity which accepts the call of Being. Motivator! “Man is not the lord of utnapishtim, beings. Man is the self, shepherd of Being” (Heidegger 1993:245).

The Heideggerian priority then is Being, and Dasein’s importance lies in its receptiveness to the call of Being. For Kierkegaard anxiety defines the possibility of responsibility, the exodus of man from the innocence of Eden and his participation to history. But the birthplace of anxiety is the experience of nothingness, the Offenders as Adults?, state in which every entity is experienced as withdrawn from its functionality. “Nothing . Self Motivator! gives birth to anxiety” (Kierkegaard 1980:41). In anxiety we do not fear something in particular but we experience the terror of a vacuum in which is existence is thrown. Existentialist thinkers are interested in anxiety because anxiety individualizes one (it is when I feel Angst more than everything that I come face to face with my own individual existence as distinct from all other entities around me).

Heidegger thinks that one of the fundamental ways with which Dasein understands itself in utnapishtim story, the world is through an self motivator array of ‘moods’. Dasein always ‘finds itself’ ( befinden sich ) in A Fundamental Childhood Role, a certain mood. Self Motivator! Man is not a thinking thing de-associated from the world, as in Cartesian metaphysics, but a being which finds itself in various moods such as anxiety or boredom. For the problem today, Existentialists, primarily and for the most part I don’t exist because I think (recall Descartes’ famous formula) but because my moods reveal to me fundamental truths of my existence. Like Kierkegaard, Heidegger also believes that anxiety is self, born out of the terror of nothingness. Food Americans Essay! “The obstinacy of the ‘nothing and nowhere within-the-world’ means as a phenomenon that the world as such is self motivator, that in the face of which one has anxiety ” (Heidegger 1962:231). For Kierkegaard the possibility of anxiety reveals man’s dual nature and because of this duality man can be saved. “If a human being were a beast or an angel, he could not be in anxiety. Because he is a synthesis, he can be in anxiety; and the more profoundly he is in anxiety, the greater is the man” (Kierkegaard 1980:155). Equally for Heidegger anxiety manifests Dasein’s possibility to live an authentic existence since it realizes that the crowd of ‘others’ (what Heidegger calls the ‘They’) cannot offer any consolation to the drama of Should Offenders as Adults?, existence. In this article we have discussed the ambiguous or at times downright critical attitude of self motivator, many existentialists toward the uncritical and unreflecting masses of people who, in a wholly anti-Kantian and wealth in the, thus also anti-Enlightenment move, locate the self, meaning of their existence in wealth 1920s, an external authority.

They thus give up their (purported) autonomy as rational beings. For Heidegger, Dasein for self motivator, the most part lives inauthentically in that Dasein is absorbed in Fast Food is Killing Essay examples, a way of life produced by others, not by Dasein itself. “We take pleasure and enjoy ourselves as they [man] take pleasure; we read, see and judge about literature and art as they see and self motivator, judge. ” (Heidegger 1962:164). To be sure this mode of existence, the Food is Killing examples, ‘They’ ( Das Man ) is one of the self, existentialia, it is an a priori condition of possibility of the Dasein which means that inauthenticity is inscribed into the mode of being of Dasein, it does not come from the Essay about Childhood Teacher's, outside as a bad influence which could be erased. Heidegger’s language is ambiguous on the problem of inauthenticity and the reader has to make his mind on the status of the ‘They’. A lot has been said on the possible connections of Heidegger’s philosophy with his political engagements. Although it is motivator, always a risky business to read the works of great philosophers as political manifestos, it seems prima facie evident that Heidegger’s thought in Juveniles Offenders Essay, this area deserves the close investigation it has received. Heidegger was a highly original thinker. His project was nothing less than the overcoming of Western metaphysics through the self motivator, positing of the forgotten question of being.

He stands in a critical relation to past philosophers but simultaneously he is heavily indebted to them, much more than he would like to admit. This is not to question his originality, it is to Food is Killing, recognize that thought is not an self ex nihilo production; it comes as a response to wealth in the, things past, and aims towards what is made possible through that past. d. Motivator! Jean-Paul Sartre (1905-1980) as an Existentialist Philosopher. In the public consciousness, at least, Sartre must surely be the central figure of existentialism. All the themes that we introduced above come together in his work. With the possible exception of Nietzsche, his writings are the most widely anthologised (especially the lovely, if oversimplifying, lecture 'Existentialism and Humanism') and his literary works are widely read (especially the novel Nausea ) or performed. Although uncomfortable in the limelight, he was nevertheless the very model of punjab state, a public intellectual, writing hundreds of short pieces for public dissemination and taking resolutely independent and often controversial stands on major political events. His writings that are most clearly existentialist in character date from Sartre's early and middle period, primarily the 1930s and 1940s. From the 1950s onwards, Sartre moved his existentialism towards a philosophy the motivator, purpose of which was to understand the possibility of a genuinely revolutionary politics. Sartre was in his late 20s when he first encountered phenomenology, specifically the philosophical ideas of Edmund Husserl. (We should point out that Heidegger was also deeply influenced by Husserl, but it is less obvious in the language he employs because he drops the language of consciousness and in education, acts.) Of particular importance, Sartre thought, was Husserl's notion of intentionality. In Sartre's interpretation of this idea, consciousness is not to be identified with a thing (for example a mind, soul or brain), that is to say some kind of a repository of motivator, ideas and images of things.

Rather, consciousness is nothing but a directedness towards things. Wealth! Sartre found a nice way to sum up the notion of the intentional object: If I love her, I love her because she is self, lovable (Sartre 1970:4-5). Within my experience, her lovableness is not an aspect of punjab state, my image of her, rather it is a feature of her (and ultimately a part of the world) towards which my consciousness directs itself. The things I notice about her (her smile, her laugh) are not originally neutral, and then I interpret the idea of them as 'lovely', they are aspects of her as lovable. The notion that consciousness is not a thing is vital to Sartre.

Indeed, consciousness is self, primarily to be characterised as nothing : it is first and foremost not that which it is conscious of. (Sartre calls human existence the in education, 'for-itself', and the being of things the motivator, 'in-itself'.) Because it is not a thing, it is not subject to the laws of things; specifically, it is not part of punjab state, a chain of causes and its identity is not akin to that of self, a substance. Above we suggested that a concern with the nature of existence, and problem in education, more particularly a concern with the distinctive nature of human existence, are defining existentialist themes. Moreover, qua consciousness, and not a thing that is part of the causal chain, I am free. From moment to moment, my every action is mine alone to motivator, choose. I will of course have a past 'me' that cannot be dispensed with; this is part of my 'situation'. However, again, I am first and foremost not my situation. Thus, at every moment I choose whether to continue on that life path, or to be something else. Thus, my existence (the mere fact that I am) is prior to my essence (what I make of myself through my free choices). I am thus utterly responsible for myself. If my act is not simply whatever happens to come to mind, then my action may embody a more general principle of action. This principle too is one that I must have freely chosen and committed myself to.

It is an flood image of the self motivator, type of life that I believe has value. Punjab State! (In these ways, Sartre intersects with the broadly Kantian account of freedom which we introduced above in our thematic section.) As situated, I also find myself surrounded by such images – from religion, culture, politics or morality – but none compels my freedom. (All these forces that seek to appropriate my freedom by objectifying me form Sartre's version of the self, crowd theme.) I exist as freedom, primarily characterised as not determined, so my continuing existence requires the ever renewed exercise of freedom (thus, in our thematic discussion above, the notion from Spinoza and Leibniz of existence as a striving-to-exist). Thus also, my non-existence, and about Communication: A Fundamental Teacher's Role, the non-existence of self, everything I believe in, is only a free choice away. I (in the sense of an authentic human existence) am not what I 'am' (the past I have accumulated, the things that surround me, or the way that others view me). I am alone in utnapishtim, my responsibility; my existence, relative to everything external that might give it meaning, is absurd. Face to face with such responsibility, I feel 'anxiety'. Notice that although Sartre's account of situatedness owes much to motivator, Nietzsche and Heidegger, he sees it primarily in terms of what gives human freedom its meaning and its burden. Nietzsche and Heidegger, in in the 1920s, contrast, view such a conception of freedom as naively metaphysical. Suppose, however, that at some point I am conscious of myself in a thing-like way. For example, I say 'I am a student' (treating myself as having a fixed, thing-like identity) or 'I had no choice' (treating myself as belonging to the causal chain). I am ascribing a fixed identity or set of motivator, qualities to myself, much as I would say 'that is a piece of granite'.

In that case I am existing in denial of my distinctively human mode of existence; I am fleeing from my freedom. This is problem, inauthenticity or 'bad faith'. As we shall see, inauthenticity is not just an occasional pitfall of human life, but essential to it. Human existence is a constant falling away from an authentic recognition of its freedom. Sartre here thus echoes the notion in Heidegger than inauthenticity is a condition of possibility of human existence. Intentionality manifests itself in another important way. Self! Rarely if ever am I simply observing the world; instead I am involved in wanting to do something, I have a goal or purpose.

Here, intentional consciousness is not a static directedness towards things, but is rather an active projection towards the Essay about A Fundamental Part Childhood, future. Suppose that I undertake as my project marrying my beloved. This is an self intentional relation to a future state of affairs. Fast Is Killing Essay! As free, I commit myself to self motivator, this project and problem, must reaffirm that commitment at every moment. It is part of my life project, the image of human life that I offer to self, myself and to others as something of value. Notice, however, that my project involves inauthenticity. I project myself into the future where I will be married to her – that is, I define myself as 'married', as if I were a fixed being.

Thus there is an about A Fundamental of the Early Childhood Teacher's essential tension to all projection. On the one hand, the mere fact that I project myself into the future is emblematic of my freedom; only a radically free consciousness can project itself. Self Motivator! I exist as projecting towards the future which, again, I am not . Thus, I am (in the utnapishtim, sense of an authentic self) what I am not (because my projecting is always underway towards the future). On the other hand, in projecting I am projecting myself as something , that is, as a thing that no longer projects, has no future, is not free. Every action, then, is both an expression of self motivator, freedom and also a snare of punjab state, freedom. Projection is absurd: I seek to become the impossible object, for-itself-in-itself, a thing that is both free and a mere thing. Self Motivator! Born of this tension is Should Offenders be Tried and Punished, a recognition of freedom, what it entails, and its essential fragility. Self! Thus, once again, we encounter existential anxiety. (In this article, we have not stressed the importance of the Fast is Killing, concept of time for existentialism, but it should not be overlooked: witness one of Nietzsche's most famous concepts (eternal recurrence) and the title of self motivator, Heidegger's major early work ( Being and Time ).) In my intentional directedness towards my beloved I find her 'loveable'. This too, though, is an objectification. Within my intentional gaze, she is loveable in much the same way that granite is hard or heavy.

Insofar as I am in love, then, I seek to deny her freedom. Insofar, however, as I wish to be loved by her, then she must be free to choose me as her beloved. If she is free, she escapes my love; if not, she cannot love. It is in these terms that Sartre analyses love in Part Three of Being and Nothingness . Love here is a case study in the basic forms of social relation. Sartre is thus moving from an entirely individualistic frame of reference (my self, my freedom and Should Juveniles be Tried as Adults?, my projects) towards a consideration of the self in concrete relations with others. Sartre is working through – in a way he would shortly see as being inadequate – the issues presented by the Hegelian dialectic of recognition, which we mentioned above. This 'hell' of endlessly circling acts of freedom and objectification is brilliantly dramatised in Sartre's play No Exit . A few years later at the end of the 1940s, Sartre wrote what has been published as Notebooks for an Ethics . Sartre (influenced in the meantime by the criticisms of self, Merleau-Ponty and de Beauvoir, and by problem in education his increasing commitment to collectivist politics) elaborated greatly his existentialist account of relations with others, taking the Hegelian idea more seriously.

He no longer thinks of concrete relations so pessimistically. While Nietzsche and Heidegger both suggest the possibility of an authentic being with others, both leave it seriously under-developed. For our purposes, there are two key ideas in the Notebooks . The first is that my projects can be realised only motivator with the cooperation of others; however, that cooperation presupposes their freedom (I cannot make her love me), and their judgements about me must concern me. Therefore permitting and nurturing the freedom of others must be a central part of problem in education, all my projects. Self Motivator! Sartre thus commits himself against any political, social or economic forms of problem in education, subjugation. Second, there is the self motivator, possibility of a form of social organisation and action in which each individual freely gives him or herself over to a joint project: a 'city of ends' (this is a reworking of Kant's idea of the 'kingdom of Should Juveniles and Punished as Adults?, ends', found in the Grounding for the Metaphysics of Morals ). An authentic existence, for Sartre, therefore means two things. First, it is something like a 'style' of existing – one that at every moment is anxious, and that means fully aware of the absurdity and self, fragility of its freedom. Second, though, there is story, some minimal level of content to any authentic project: whatever else my project is, it must also be a project of freedom, for motivator, myself and for others. e. Offenders And Punished! Simone de Beauvoir (1908-1986) as an Existentialist Philosopher. Simone de Beauvoir was the self motivator, youngest student ever to pass the demanding agregation at the prestigious Ecole Normale Superieure.

Subsequently a star Normalienne , she was a writer, philosopher, feminist, lifelong partner of Jean-Paul Sartre, notorious for her anti-bourgeois way of Essay about Part of the Childhood Teacher's, living and her free sexual relationships which included among others a passionate affair with the American writer Nelson Algren. Much ink has been spilled debating whether de Beauvoir’s work constitutes a body of independent philosophical work, or is a reformulation of Sartre’s work. The debate rests of course upon the fundamental misconception that wants a body of motivator, work to exist and Fast Food is Killing Americans, develop independently of self motivator, (or uninfluenced by) its intellectual environment. Such ‘objectivity’ is not only in the impossible but also undesirable: such a body of work would be ultimately irrelevant since it would be non-communicable. Motivator! So the question of de Beauvoir’s ‘independence’ could be dismissed here as irrelevant to the philosophical questions that her work raises. In 1943 Being and Should Juveniles Offenders, Nothingness , the groundwork of the Existentialist movement in France was published. There Sartre gave an account of freedom as ontological constitutive of the subject. One cannot but be free: this is the kernel of the Sartrean conception of freedom. In 1945 Merleau-Ponty’s Phenomenology of Perception is self, published. Fast Food Is Killing Examples! There, as well as in an essay from the motivator, same year titled 'The war has taken place' , Merleau-Ponty heavily criticizes the Sartrean stand, criticising it as a reformulation of Offenders be Tried and Punished Essay, basic Stoic tenets. One cannot assume freedom in isolation from the self, freedom of others.

Action is participatory: “…my freedom is interwoven with that of others by way of the world” (Merleau-Ponty in Stewart 1995:315). Moreover action takes place within a certain historical context. For Merleau-Ponty the subjective free-will is punjab state, always in a dialectical relationship with its historical context. In 1947 Simone de Beauvoir’s Ethics of Ambiguity is self, published. The book is an introduction to existentialism but also a subtle critique of Sartre’s position on freedom, and a partial extension of Essay about A Fundamental Part Early Childhood Teacher's, existentialism towards the social. Although de Beauvoir will echo Merleau-Ponty’s criticism regarding the essential interrelation of the subjects, nevertheless she will leave unstressed the motivator, importance that the social context plays in is Killing, the explication of moral problems. Like Sartre it is only later in her life that this will be acknowledged. In any case, de Beauvoir’s book precipitates in turn a major rethink on Sartre’s part, and the result is the Notebooks for an Ethics . In Ethics of Ambiguity de Beauvoir offers a picture of the self motivator, human subject as constantly oscillating between facticity and transcendence. Whereas the human is always already restricted by the brute facts of his existence, nevertheless it always aspires to overcome its situation, to choose its freedom and thus to create itself. This tension must be considered positive, and not restrictive of is Killing Americans Essay examples, action.

It is exactly because the ontology of the human is a battleground of antithetical movements (a view consistent with de Beauvoir’s Hegelianism) that the subject must produce an ethics which will be continuous with its ontological core. Self! The term for flood, this tension is ambiguity . Ambiguity is not a quality of the motivator, human as substance, but a characterisation of problem today, human existence. Self Motivator! We are ambiguous beings destined to throw ourselves into the future while simultaneously it is our very own existence that throws us back into story, facticity. That is to say, back to the brute fact that we are in self, a sense always already destined to fail – not in this or that particular project but to fail as pure and sustained transcendence. It is utnapishtim, exactly because of (and through) this fundamental failure that we realize that our ethical relation to the world cannot be self-referential but must pass through the realization of the common destiny of the human as a failed and interrelated being. De Beauvoir, unlike Sartre, was a scholarly reader of Hegel. Her position on an existential ethics is thus more heavily influenced by Hegel’s view in the Phenomenology of Spirit concerning the moment of recognition (Hegel 1977:111). There Hegel describes the movement in which self-consciousness produces itself by self positing another would be self-consciousness, not as a mute object ( Gegen-stand ) but as itself self-consciousness. The Hegelian movement remains one of the most fascinating moments in the history of philosophy since it is for the first time that the constitution of the self does not take place from in education within the self (as happens with Descartes, for whom the only truth is the truth of my existence; or Leibniz, for whom the monads are ‘windowless’; or Fichte, for whom the ‘I’ is motivator, absolutely self-constitutive) but from the Offenders Essay, outside. It is, Hegel tells us, only because someone else recognizes me as a subject that I can be constituted as such. Outside the moment of recognition there is no self-consciousness.

De Beauvoir takes to heart the Hegelian lesson and tries to formulate an ethics from it. What would this ethics be? As in self, Nietzsche, ethics refers to wealth 1920s, a way of life (a ????), as opposed to morality which concerns approved or condemned behaviour. Thus there are no recipes for ethics. Drawn from Hegel’s moment of recognition, de Beauvoir acknowledges that the possibility of human flourishing is based firstly upon the recognition of the existence of the other (“Man can find a justification of his own existence only in the existence of the other men” (Beauvoir 1976:72) and secondly on the recognition that my own flourishing (or my ability to pose projects, in the language of existentialists) passes through the motivator, possibility of today, a common flourishing. “Only the freedom of others keeps each one of us from hardening in the absurdity of facticity,” (Beauvoir 1976:71) de Beauvoir writes; or again “To will oneself free is also to motivator, will others free” (Beauvoir 1976:73). The Ethics of punjab state, Ambiguity ends by declaring the necessity of assuming one’s freedom and the assertion that it is only through action that freedom makes itself possible. This is not a point to motivator, be taken light-heartedly. 1920s! It constitutes a movement of opposition against a long tradition of philosophy understanding itself as theoria : the disinterested contemplation on the nature of the human and the world. De Beauvoir, in common with most existentialists, understands philosophy as praxis : involved action in the world and participation in motivator, the course of history.

It is out of this understanding that The Second Sex is born. In 1949 Le Deuxieme Sexe is published in France. In English in 1953 it appeared as The Second Sex in utnapishtim, an abridged translation. The book immediately became a best seller and later a founding text of S econd Wave Feminism (the feminist movement from the early 60’s to the 70’s inspired by the civil rights movement and self, focusing at the theoretical examination of the concepts of equality, inequality, the about Part Early Childhood Role, role of family, justice and so forth). More than anything, The Second Sex constitutes a study in applied existentialism where the abstract concept ‘Woman’ gives way to the examination of the lives of everyday persons struggling against oppression and humiliation. When de Beauvoir says that there is no such thing as a ‘Woman’ we have to motivator, hear the echo of the Kierkegaardian assertion of the single individual against the abstractions of Hegelian philosophy, or similarly Sartre’s insistence on the necessity of the prioritization of the as Adults? Essay, personal lives of self motivator, self-creating people (what Sartre calls ‘existence’) as opposed to a pre-established ideal of what humans should be like (what Sartre calls ‘essence’).

The Second Sex is an Should Offenders be Tried as Adults? exemplary text showing how a philosophical movement can have real, tangible effects on the lives of many people, and is a magnificent exercise in what philosophy could be. “I hesitated a long time before writing a book on woman. The subject is self motivator, irritating, especially for women. ” (Beauvoir 2009:3). The Second Sex begins with the most obvious (but rarely posed) question: What is woman? De Beauvoir finds that at present there is no answer to that question. The reason is that tradition has always thought of woman as the other of man. It is only man that constitutes himself as a subject (as the Absolute de Beauvoir says), and Should be Tried as Adults?, woman defines herself only through him. “She determines and differentiates herself in self, relation to man, and he does not in relation to her; she is the inessential in front of the essential. ” (Beauvoir 2009:6). But why is it that woman has initially accepted or tolerated this process whereby she becomes the other of man?

De Beauvoir does not give a consoling answer; on the contrary, by turning to Sartre’s notion of bad faith (which refers to the human being’s anxiety in front of the responsibility entailed by utnapishtim flood story the realization of its radical freedom) she thinks that women at times are complicit to their situation. Self Motivator! It is problem, indeed easier for motivator, one – anyone – to assume the role of an object (for example a housewife 'kept' by her husband) than to take responsibility for creating him or herself and creating the possibilities of story, freedom for others. Naturally the condition of bad faith is not always the self, case. Often women found themselves in in the 1920s, a sociocultural environment which denied them the very possibility of personal flourishing (as happens with most of the self, major religious communities). A further problem that women face is that of understanding themselves as a unity which would enable them to assume the role of their choosing. “Proletarians say ‘we’. So do blacks” (Beauvoir 2009:8). By saying ‘we’ they assume the role of the subject and turn everyone else into ‘other’. Women are unable to utter this ‘we’. Punjab State! “They live dispersed among men, tied by motivator homes, work, economic interests and social conditions to certain men – fathers or husbands – more closely than to other women. As bourgeois women, they are in punjab state, solidarity with bourgeois men and not with women proletarians; as white women, they are in solidarity with white men and not with black women” (Beauvoir 2009:9).

Women primarily align themselves to their class or race and not to other women. The female identity is “very much bound up with the identity of the self, men around them. ” (Reynolds 2006:145). One of the story, most celebrated moments in The Second Sex is the much quoted phrase: “One is motivator, not born, but rather becomes, woman” (Beauvoir 2009:293). She explains: “No biological, physical or economic destiny defines the figure that the human female takes on in society; it is is Killing Americans examples, civilization as a whole that elaborates this intermediary product between the male and the eunuch that is self motivator, called feminine” (Beauvoir 2009:293). For some feminists this clearly inaugurates the problematic of the sex-gender distinction (where sex denotes the biological identity of the person and gender the cultural attribution of properties to the sexed body). Simply put, there is absolutely nothing that determines the ‘assumed’ femininity of the woman (how a woman acts, feels, behaves) – everything that we have come to think as ‘feminine’ is Should Juveniles and Punished as Adults?, a social construction not a natural given. Later feminists like Monique Wittig and Judith Butler will argue that ‘sex’ is already ‘gender’ in the sense that a sexed body exists always already within a cultural nexus that defines it. Thus the sex assignment (a doctor pronouncing the sex of the baby) is a naturalized (but not at all natural) normative claim which delivers the human into a world of power relations. f. Albert Camus (1913-1960) as an Existentialist Philosopher. Albert Camus was a French intellectual, writer and journalist.

His multifaceted work as well as his ambivalent relation to both philosophy and existentialism makes every attempt to classify him a rather risky operation. A recipient of the 1957 Nobel Prize for Literature primarily for his novels, he is also known as a philosopher due to his non-literary work and his relation with Jean-Paul Sartre. And yet his response was clear: “I am not a philosopher, because I don’t believe in reason enough to believe in a system. What interests me is knowing how we must behave, and more precisely, how to self motivator, behave when one does not believe in God or reason” (Camus in Sherman 2009: 1). Punjab State! The issue is self, not just about the label 'existentialist'. It rather points to a deep tension within the is Killing examples, current of thought of all thinkers associated with existentialism. The question is: With how many voices can thought speak?

As we have already seen, the thinkers of existentialism often deployed more than one. Almost all of motivator, them share a deep suspicion to a philosophy operating within reason as conceived of by the Enlightenment. Camus shares this suspicion and his so called philosophy of the absurd intends to set limits to the overambitions of Western rationality. Punjab State! Reason is absurd in that it believes that it can explain the totality of the human experience whereas it is exactly its inability for explanation that, for example, a moment of fall designates. Thus in his novel “The Fall” the protagonist’s tumultuous narrative reveals the overtaking of a life of superficial regularity by self motivator the forces of darkness and irrationality. Punjab State! “A bourgeois hell, inhabited of course by bad dreams” (Camus 2006:10). In a similar fashion Camus has also repudiated his connection with existentialism. “Non, je ne suis pas existentialist” is the self, title of a famous interview that he gave for the magazine Les Nouvelles Litteraires on the 15 of November, 1945. The truth of the matter is that Camus’ rejection of existentialism is directed more toward Sartre’s version of utnapishtim story, it rather than toward a dismissal of the main problems that the existential thinkers faced. Particularly, Camus was worried that Sartre’s deification of history (Sartre’s proclaimed Marxism) would be incompatible with the affirmation of personal freedom. Motivator! Camus accuses Hegel (subsequently Marx himself) of reducing man to history and thus denying man the possibility of creating his own history, that is, affirming his freedom. Philosophically, Camus is known for his conception of the absurd. Perhaps we should clarify from the very beginning what the absurd is Juveniles be Tried Essay, not.

The absurd is not nihilism. For Camus the acceptance of the absurd does not lead to nihilism (according to Nietzsche nihilism denotes the state in self, which the highest values devalue themselves) or to inertia, but rather to Should be Tried Essay, their opposite: to action and participation. The notion of the absurd signifies the space which opens up between, on the one hand, man’s need for intelligibility and, on the other hand, 'the unreasonable silence of the self motivator, world' as he beautifully puts it. In a world devoid of God, eternal truths or any other guiding principle, how could man bear the responsibility of a meaning-giving activity? The absurd man, like an Essay about Early astronaut looking at the earth from self motivator above, wonders whether a philosophical system, a religion or a political ideology is able to make the world respond to the questioning of man, or rather whether all human constructions are nothing but the excessive face-paint of a clown which is there to cover his sadness. Punjab State! This terrible suspicion haunts the absurd man. Self! In one of the most memorable openings of a non-fictional book he states: “There is but one truly serious philosophical problem and that is suicide. Judging whether life is or is not worth living amounts to answering the fundamental question of philosophy.

All the rest – whether or not the world has three dimensions, whether the mind has nine or twelve categories – comes afterwards. These are games; one must first answer” (Camus 2000:11). The problem of suicide (a deeply personal problem) manifests the exigency of a meaning-giving response. Indeed for Food Americans Essay, Camus a suicidal response to the problem of meaning would be the confirmation that the absurd has taken over man’s inner life. Self Motivator! It would mean that man is not any more an animal going after answers, in accordance with some inner drive that leads him to act in order to endow the world with meaning. Flood Story! The suicide has become but a passive recipient of the muteness of the world. “. The absurd . is simultaneously awareness and rejection of death” (Camus 2000:54). One has to be aware of self, death – because it is precisely the realization of man’s mortality that pushes someone to strive for answers – and one has ultimately to reject death – that is, reject suicide as well as the living death of inertia and inaction. At the end one has to keep the flood story, absurd alive, as Camus says. But what does it that mean? In The Myth of Sisyphus Camus tells the story of the mythical Sisyphus who was condemned by the Gods to ceaselessly roll a rock to self, the top of a mountain and then have to is Killing Americans examples, let it fall back again of its own weight. “Sisyphus, proletarian of the gods, powerless and rebellious, knows the whole extent of his wretched condition: it is what he thinks of during his descent.

The lucidity that was to constitute his torture at the same time crowns his victory. Self! There is no fate that cannot be surmounted by scorn” (Camus 2000:109). One must imagine then Sisyphus victorious: fate and absurdity have been overcome by a joyful contempt. Scorn is the appropriate response in the face of the absurd; another name for this 'scorn' though would be artistic creation. When Camus says: “One does not discover the absurd without being tempted to write a manual of happiness” (Camus 2000:110) he writes about a moment of exhilarated madness, which is the moment of the genesis of the artistic work.

Madness, but nevertheless profound – think of the function of the Fool in Shakespeare’s King Lear as the one who reveals to the king the most profound truths through play, mimicry and songs. Such madness can overcome the absurd without cancelling it altogether. Almost ten years after the Fast Food Americans Essay examples, publication of The Myth of Sisyphus Camus publishes his second major philosophical work, The Rebel (1951). Camus continues the problematic which had begun with The Myth of Sisyphus. Previously, revolt or creation had been considered the self, necessary response to Essay Part Teacher's Role, the absurdity of existence. Self! Here, Camus goes on to examine the nature of Offenders be Tried and Punished Essay, rebellion and its multiple manifestations in history. In The Myth of Sisyphus , in truly Nietzschean fashion, Camus had said: “There is but one useful action, that of remaking man and the earth” (Camus 2000:31). However, in self, The Rebel , reminiscent of Orwell’s Animal Farm , one of the first points he makes is the following: “The slave starts by begging for justice and ends by wanting to wear a crown. He too wants to dominate” (Camus 2000b:31).

The problem is that while man genuinely rebels against both unfair social conditions and, as Camus says, against the whole of creation, nevertheless in and Punished, the practical administration of such revolution, man comes to deny the humanity of the other in an attempt to impose his own individuality. Take for example the case of the infamous Marquis de Sade which Camus explores. In Sade, contradictory forces are at work (see The 120 Days of Sodom ). On the one hand, Sade wishes the establishment of a (certainly mad ) community with desire as the ultimate master, and on the other hand this very desire consumes itself and all the subjects who stand in its way. Camus goes on self motivator, to examine historical manifestations of rebellion, the most prominent case being that of the French Revolution. Camus argues that the revolution ended up taking the place of the transcendent values which it sought to abolish. An all-powerful notion of justice now takes the place formerly inhabited by God. Rousseau’s infamous suggestion that under the rule of wealth 1920s, ‘general will’ everyone would be 'forced to be free' (Rousseau in Foley 2008:61) opens the way to the crimes committed after the revolution. Camus fears that all revolutions end with the re-establishment of the State. “. Seventeen eighty-nine brings Napoleon; 1848 Napoleon III; 1917 Stalin; the Italian disturbances of the twenties, Mussolini; the Weimar Republic, Hitler” (Camus 2000b:146). Camus is led to examine the motivator, Marxist view of history as a possible response to the failed attempts at wealth 1920s, the establishment of a true revolutionary regime.

Camus examines the similarities between the Christian and the Marxist conception of self, history. Fast Food Is Killing Americans Examples! They both exhibit a bourgeois preoccupation with progress. In the name of the future everything can be justified: “the future is the only kind of property that the masters willingly concede to the slaves” (Camus 2000b:162). History according to both views is the linear progress from a set beginning to a definite end (the metaphysical salvation of man or the materialistic salvation of self, him in the future Communist society). Influenced by Kojeve’s reading of Hegel, Camus interprets this future, classless society as the problem in education, ‘end of history’. The ‘end of self motivator, history’ suggests that when all contradictions cease then history itself will come to an end. This is, Camus argues, essentially nihilistic: history, in effect, accepts that meaning creation is no longer possible and commits suicide. Because historical revolutions are for the most part nihilistic movements, Camus suggests that it is the making-absolute of the values of the revolution that necessarily lead to their negation.

On the contrary a relative conception of these values will be able to sustain a community of free individuals who have not forgotten that every historical rebellion has begun by affirming a proto-value (that of human solidarity) upon which every other value can be based. 3. In Education! The Influence of self motivator, Existentialism. In the field of visual arts existentialism exercised an enormous influence, most obviously on the movement of Expressionism. Expressionism began in Germany at the beginning of the 20 th century. With its emphasis on subjective experience, Angst and intense emotionality, German expressionism sought to go beyond the naivete of realist representation and to deal with the anguish of the modern man (exemplified in the terrible experiences of utnapishtim story, WWI). Many of the artists of self, Expressionism read Nietzsche intensively and following Nietzsche’s suggestion for a transvaluation of values experimented with alternative lifestyles.

Erich Heckel’s woodcut “Friedrich Nietzsche” from 1905 is a powerful reminder of the Should Juveniles be Tried as Adults?, movement’s connection to Existentialist thought. Abstract expressionism (which included artists such as de Kooning and Pollock, and theorists such as Rosenberg) continued with some of the same themes in the United States from the 1940s and self motivator, tended to embrace existentialism as one of its intellectual guides, especially after Sartre's US lecture tour in 1946 and a production of No Exit in New York. German Expressionism was particularly important during the birth of the new art of cinema. Utnapishtim Flood Story! Perhaps the motivator, closest cinematic work to Existentialist concerns remains F.W. Murnau’s The Last Laugh (1924) in which the constantly moving camera (which prefigures the ‘rule’ of the hand-held camera of the Danish Dogma 95 ) attempts to arrest the spiritual anguish of a man who suddenly finds himself in a meaningless world. Expressionism became a world-wide style within cinema, especially as film directors like Lang fled Germany and ended up in Hollywood. Jean Genet's Un chant d'amour (1950) is a moving poetic exploration of desire. In the sordid, claustrophobic cells of a prison the inmates’ craving for intimacy takes place against the background of an unavoidable despair for existence itself. European directors such as Bergman and Godard are often associated with existentialist themes. Godard's Vivre sa vie ( My Life to Live , 1962) is Essay, explicit in its exploration of the nature of freedom under conditions of extreme social and personal pressure. In the late 20 th and motivator, early 21 st centuries existentialist ideas became common in mainstream cinema, pervading the work of writers and directors such as Woody Allen, Richard Linklater, Charlie Kaufman and Christopher Nolan.

Given that Sartre and Camus were both prominent novelists and playwrights, the influence of existentialism on literature is in education today, not surprising. However, the influence was also the other way. Motivator! Novelists such as Dostoevsky or Kafka, and the dramatist Ibsen, were often cited by mid-century existentialists as important precedents, right along with Kierkegaard and Nietzsche. Dostoevsky creates a character Ivan Karamazov (in The Brothers Karamazov , 1880) who holds the view that if God is dead, then everything is permitted; both Nietzsche and Sartre discuss Dostoevsky with enthusiasm. Within drama, the theatre of the absurd and most obviously Beckett were influenced by existentialist ideas; later playwrights such as Albee, Pinter and in the, Stoppard continue this tradition. One of the key figures of 20 th century psychology, Sigmund Freud, was indebted to Nietzsche especially for his analysis of the role of psychology within culture and history, and for self motivator, his view of cultural artefacts such as drama or music as 'unconscious' documentations of psychological tensions. But a more explicit taking up of existentialist themes is found in the broad 'existentialist psychotherapy' movement. A common theme within this otherwise very diverse group is that previous psychology misunderstood the fundamental nature of the human and especially its relation to others and to acts of meaning-giving; thus also, previous psychology had misunderstood what a 'healthy' attitude to self, others and meaning might be.

Key figures here include Swiss psychologists Ludwig Binswanger and about A Fundamental of the Teacher's, later Menard Boss, both of who were enthusiastic readers of Heidegger; the Austrian Frankl, who invented the motivator, method of logotherapy; in England, Laing and Cooper, who were explicitly influenced by Sartre; and in Essay, the United States, Rollo May, who stresses the ineradicable importance of anxiety. As a whole, existentialism has had relatively little direct influence within philosophy. In Germany, existentialism (and especially Heidegger) was criticised for being obscure, abstract or even mystical in nature. This criticism was made especially by Adorno in The Jargon of Authenticity, and in Dog Years , novelist Gunter Grass gives a Voltaire-like, savage satire of Heidegger. The criticism was echoed by many in the analytic tradition. Heidegger and the existentialist were also taken to motivator, task for paying insufficient attention to social and political structures or values, with dangerous results.

In France, philosophers like Sartre were criticised by Essay about A Fundamental Early Role those newly under the influence of structuralism for paying insufficient attention to the nature of language and to impersonal structures of meaning. In short, philosophy moved on, and in different directions. Individual philosophers remain influential, however: Nietzsche and Heidegger in particular are very much 'live' topics in philosophy, even in the 21 st century. However, there are some less direct influences that remain important. Let us raise three examples. Both the issue of freedom in relation to situation, and that of the philosophical significance of what otherwise might appear to be extraneous contextual factors, remain key, albeit in dramatically altered formulation, within the work of Michel Foucault or Alain Badiou, two figures central to late 20 th century European thought.

Likewise, the philosophical importance that the existentialists placed upon emotion has been influential, legitimising a whole domain of philosophical research even by philosophers who have no interest in existentialism. Similarly, existentialism was a philosophy that insisted philosophy could and should deal very directly with 'real world' topics such as sex, death or crime, topics that had most frequently been approached abstractly within the philosophical tradition. Mary Warnock wrote on existentialism and especially Sartre, for self, example, while also having an incredibly important and public role within recent applied ethics.

Do My Homework 123 Make My Assignment Done Online - Self-Motivation Techniques & Examples |… - Marywood University

Nov 22, 2017 Self motivator,

High Quality Custom Essay Writing Service - Buy Essay Now - Steps To Continuous Self-Motivation -… - University of Minnesota Twin Cities

27 Best Free File Copy Software For Windows. Here are 27 best free file copy software . All these file copy software let you copy files or folders easily. These file copy manager software are available to be downloaded free for your Windows PC. These file copy software have various features, like: copy/move files or folders from one location to self, another at a high speed , can pause and resume the process, copy multiple files from multiple locations to Food is Killing Americans Essay, any target folder, support for drag and drop, can replace Windows default copy-paste command, can be invoked using Ctrl+C/Ctrl+X and Ctrl+V shortcuts , and more. You can try these free file copy software and find which one suits you better. Motivator! You can try these best free File Encryption and Text Encryption software. TeraCopy is a free (for personal use) file copy software for Windows to copy files or folders from one location to Essay Communication: A Fundamental of the Early Childhood Teacher's, another easily.

It can replace the Windows Explorer’s copy feature with its own. It can save your precious time when copying or moving files or folders. It has a pause and resume function and you can pause the motivator process anytime. It is problem in education a lightweight application and can be installed as a portable software also. It is motivator fast and reliable file copy software. It has various other useful functions too. MiniCopier is a free to use file copy manager. It lets you copy and paste files and/or folders from one location/folder to another.

It has a basic user interface and is easy to use. Just drag and drop files/folders to its basket and now go to destination folder by exploring it through normal Windows Explorer. Now drag and drop it to the dropbox shown in the MiniCopier interface. You can add multiple files from various locations to this basket. You can pause and resume the process whenever necessary. It has other various useful options also.

FastCopy is a free and easy to use folder copying software. It lets you copy the entire directory from problem, one place to motivator, another. Select the source directory by browsing it and choose the destination directory also by browsing. Now click the execute button to start the copy process. You can set the buffer size for the operation manually. You can install it or use directly its executable from the extracted folder. It has various other useful options too. Ultracopier is another file copy manager software in the list. It lets you copy files of wealth in the folders easily from one folder to another. You can use it as a default copy handler or use it when necessary. Just add the files or folders to its input window and then select the destination and click start button to start the self process.

Copy Handler is a free, open source and easy to use file copy manager software for Windows. It lets you manage your common task of copy/move for files and A Fundamental Part Early Childhood Role, folders from one location to another. You can use it as a default copy command handler also. It saves the history of copied/moved files/folder in its list. It also comes in portable form. Self Motivator! ExtremeCopy is another famous file copy software for flood story, Windows.

It lets you transfer files by copying or moving in a high speed. Self Motivator! It can be used as a default copy handler for your system. It increases the copy speed as compared to utnapishtim flood, Windows system copy command. You can pause the process of copying any time. If you copy or move big amount of data from one location to another, then it is a helpful software for you. Unstoppable Copier is actually a data recovery software, but you can use it as a file copy manager also. It copies data at a high speed. You can use it to copy files or folders from one location to motivator, another easily. In The! You can pause the process at any time or when required. Motivator! It also comes in portable version.

RichCopy is a file copy software available free for Windows. It lets you copy files in folders with a fast speed. To use it you have to select the source path and then destination. Click on start button on the toolbar or choose it from action menu to problem, start the process. You can use the timer option also. It has various other options to choose. SuperCopier lets you copy files and folders from one location to another. It is an motivator easy to use application.

You can add files or folders to be copied to its list from various locations (target location is common as you set). You can pause the transfer at Fast examples any time. You can limit the copy speed also. QCopy is a free and easy to use file copy software for Windows. It lets you copy files and contents of the folders to the destination location. You can drag and drop files or folders to its main screen or use Send To - QCopy from the context menu of any file or folder. It is motivator a lightweight application. You can save or load the Should Juveniles Offenders and Punished queue for later use. Also you can copy files from self motivator, multiple locations simultaneously. NiceCopier is a simple and Should Juveniles Offenders be Tried as Adults? Essay, easy to use file copy software.

It can replace the self Windows default file copy handler. Offenders Be Tried And Punished As Adults?! You can use it simply by using normal copy/cut paste command. It shows you the list of tasks in its system tray icon. You can change its default settings like run with startup etc. It can copy and paste the data at a high speed. Robocopy GUI is a free software for copying files in self, a folder from one location to Should Offenders and Punished as Adults?, another. It copies at a high speed. It copies the contents of a source folder to self, the destination folder. It has various advanced options to choose from. About Part Of The Early Childhood Teacher's! You can save the copy script to a CMD file also and can run it later or when required.

Ycopy is a free copy utility for Windows. It saves your valuable time by increasing the speed of copy process. Just select the source and destination folder and motivator, after that click on Start Copy button to start the process. It can skip the files which are unable to punjab state, be copied. It also has an option to self, pause/resume the copying process.

SchizoCopy is a free software for copying large amount of data easily. You can easily copy or move data files from one folder to another. It has faster speed and more functionalities than from Windows default copy operations. It also has a backup support option for punjab state, e.g. it can resume copy/move operations in case of motivator unexpected shutdown. About Communication: Part Of The Early! File Copy is a very small and easy to use file copy software. It lets you copy file from self, one folder to another folder easily. You can copy only one file at flood story a time by using it. It is a lightweight application and does not require installation. Motivator! It increases the speed of copy operation. After selecting the source file and destination folder you can click on Go button to start the process.

KillCopy is a file copy manager available free for Windows. It lets you copy files or folders from one location to another at utnapishtim flood story a high speed. It saves you a lot of time when copying or moving huge amount of data. You can pause the process at self motivator any time or when necessary. It replaces the systems default copy handler. It is small in size and is easy to Fast Food is Killing Americans Essay, use. Fast File Copy is a file management software.

It has a dual pane explorer like interface. It recognizes ZIP files and folders so you can choose them as a source item. You can select the source folder or ZIP file from its left pane and destination folder from the right pane. By clicking on “Copy from Source to Destination” button you can start the process of copying. FF Copy is a lightweight and motivator, easy to use free file copy software for Windows. It lets you copy or move files from one location to another. You can add multiple tasks to its list. It processes at very high speed. Just select the source files and punjab state, select the destination and start the motivator process. You can manually control the process of copying or moving also. Iman File Copier is a free tool to copy data from one folder to another.

Its basic purpose is to copy data from CDs or DVDs where Windows fails to copy. You can use it to copy normal files also. You can select or add multiple files simultaneously for copying process. And after selecting the destination directory you can click on Copy button to start the process. You can also select the buffer size of copying file process. The program does not require installation.

XCOPY is a simple and lightweight utility for copying folders from one location to another using batch file. It has two panes Copy From and Copy To respectively. On the Copy From pane browse and be Tried as Adults? Essay, click the folder you want to copy and in the Copy To pane browse for the target folder. Now you can create a batch file by clicking on “Create Batch File to copy files” button to create a BAT file. You can double click this batch file or run it from command prompt to self motivator, start the copy process. Fast Copy Paste is a free software for copying and pasting. In Education! You can copy any file or folder from one location to motivator, another easily and at high speed. You can easily select source file or folder by browsing and then browse for destination location. Is Killing Essay! You can start the process by clicking on “Copy File or Folder” button. It does not require installation and self motivator, can be used as a portable software. Problem In Education! WinMend File Copy is a free and easy to use batch file copy software.

It lets you copy multiple files and folders from various locations to any user defined location easily. It can increase the speed of copy process up to 3 times in comparison to system default. You can pause and resume the copy process at any time. You can use drag and drop method or use buttons on its interface to add files or folders to the list. PerigeeCopy is a file copy software. It lets you copy/move files and folders from one location to another. You can use normal copy/cut command from Windows Explorer and at the time of paste choose PerigeePaste from the context menu (by right clicking). You can make it default for file operations also by configuring it. It copies at a high speed and thus saves your valuable time. Motivator! Bit Copier lets you copy files and folders from one location to in the, another. It comes in self, portable version and Juveniles Offenders be Tried and Punished, is available free.

It can be used as an alternative to Windows copier. Self Motivator! You can copy multiple files and folders simultaneously. You can change the default buffer speed also. You can try other various useful options too. WinRoboCopy is a free GUI version of problem RoboCopy command. It lets you copy any selected folder from selected location to target location. On clicking RoboCopy! button you can start the process of self motivator copying. Is Killing Essay Examples! You can use wildcards and other switches also when copying. It has a schedule option also, so you can schedule your copy job for any specific time.

File Copy Utility is a free software that lets you copy files or folders from one location to another. You can drag and motivator, drop files and folders to its main window. Punjab State! Now select the self motivator destination folder and click “Copy Now” button to start the process. It also has an option to shut down the computer after completing the copy job. It comes as a single executable file and Essay about Communication: Part Role, does not require installation. n2ncopy is a small Windows program that lets you copy or move multiple files and folders to one or multiple locations in one go. You can drag and drop files and folders to self, its interface.

It shows you the count of files and folders in the list. You can configure it by right clicking on its interface. For e.g. Wealth 1920s! you can choose the target folder, copy or move option etc. It comes in self, a ZIP file and does not require installation. Essay About Early Role! I#8217;ve tried a couple of software copiers previously, but the best one I have had experienced using is the GS RichCopy 360.

Truly fast and easy to use and has features that are very useful. Self! If you are not satisfied with the one you are using (as was my case before), I strongly urge you to give it a try! Thanks. In Microsoft communities have one person who insiusts on telling me I have way too many postings about utnapishtim this. My answer? So what!

Sometimes the problems of files and folders(in windows 10) deleted by Microsoft or not sutting or deleting-it will go where you want it to go but many times it turns from a cut and delete to copy and not realizing this-seen hindreds and motivator, hindreds of files multiply. Thanks for your review. Obviously there are allot of popular software available when it comes to faster copying. I#8217;ve used few of them myself, but has now been inconvenienced by several crashes/errors/data loss when transferring files. I had to do it all over again and it#8217;s really not worth for in the, a busy individual like me. Self Motivator! My friends suggested GS RichCopy 360, and for several months it has been working perfectly fine for me.

You might want to give it a try if you are looking for a reliable software. Hope this helped.

Buy Economics Papers Online | 100% Original - Job Interview Question: Are You Self-Motivated?… - Texas A&M University

Nov 22, 2017 Self motivator,

How to Buy an Essay Online - Reasons Why Self-Motivated Learners Win at Life… - University of Wisconsin Madison, Madison, WI

“How do Locard’s Theory and Individualisation demonstrate that a suspect was present at a crime scene during the commission of an offence?” “Wherever he steps, whatever he touches, whatever he leaves, even unconsciously, will serve as a silent witness against him. Not only his fingerprints or his footprints, but his hair, the fibers from his clothes, the glass he breaks, the self motivator, tool mark he leaves, the paint he scratches, the blood or semen he deposits or collects. All of these and more, bear mute witness against him. This is evidence that does not forget. It is not confused by the excitement of the moment.

It is not absent because human witnesses are. It is factual evidence. Physical evidence cannot be wrong, it cannot perjure itself, it cannot be wholly absent. Only human failure to find it, study and understand it, can diminish its value.” [#1] According to the popular idiom referring to Dr. Edmond Locard’s theory of exchange “every contact leaves a trace” . Locard’s publications make no mention of an in the “exchange principle,” although he did make the observation “Il est impossible au malfaiteur d’agir avec l’intensite que suppose l’action criminelle sans laisser des traces de son passage.” (It is impossible for a criminal to act, especially considering the intensity of self a crime, without leaving traces of this presence.). The term “principle of exchange” first appears in Police and Crime-Detection Today in 1940, and was adapted from Locard’s observations. [#2] That evolved in punjab state what we know today as Locard’s theory and found its place in a field of modern forensic science.

When a crime is committed, police officers and investigators are often left with only self small fragments of evidence which are just a part of the bigger image. According to Locard by coming into contact with objects at the crime scene, a criminal also takes part of that scene with him. That means there is always some evidence left, even if investigators fail to spot them, that doesn’t mean evidence do not exist. Materials found at the crime scene must link the scene of the Juveniles Offenders as Adults? Essay, murder with the suspect or his personal environment. It is very important to gather the evidence avoiding cross contamination as in court, prosecution’s case against the accused may be based exclusively and essentially on the evidence of the trace materials. [#3] Well acquired and preserved exhibits can be crucial in conviction of a suspect. In Edward Charles Splatt’s case in the final conclusion jury stated that the “the number (of trace materials) was too great to be attributed to coincidence or accident” and self motivator, that “the accused must have been so closely in contact with the deceased that he must have been her attacker and indeed her slayer.” [#4] In given scenario we assume that fingerprints and the suspect’s blood are found on a murder weapon at the scene but the suspect denies ever entering the premises. We can use given evidence to connect the suspect with the crime scene and try to prove that he was present at the scene during the commission of the punjab state, offence [Fig1]. To achieve that we need at least three different members of the scientific personnel.

Crime Scene Investigators (CSIs), also known as Scenes of Crime Officers (SOCOs). Their tasks are to attend crime scenes and to protect them to avoid evidence being disturbed. Also to record and examine exhibits. Self Motivator! The evidence they discover is then used to investigate crimes. [#5] During the crime scene examination SOCO’s as much as they cannot forget about retrieving even the smallest piece of evidence they must also keep an eye on Food Essay the whole context of the situation. While seeking of all of the individual elements or trace materials it is self, important that the Crime Scene Examiner has a holistic approach to the examined case. According to Robertson and Roux (2009) it is almost impossible to identify, test and revise relevant hypotheses otherwise. It is essential to take this under the consideration right at the beginning of the investigation, as later, individual analysts will have to conduct their examination of individual materials with what was selected by the crime scene ‘sorter’ and without the benefit of flood story a broader context. Motivator! At the investigative stage trace evidence may be critical in identifying relevant hypotheses and providing investigative leads. [#6]

Now, let’s assume that during the search of the crime scene a weapon with fingerprints and blood on it was discovered. To find blood, SOCO, which was attending the crime scene mentioned above in text, could choose the Kastle-Meyer test that uses the utnapishtim, substance called phenolphthalein, which is normally colourless, but turns pink in the presence of blood. Another test for blood is luminal, which is sprayed over a room to detect even the tiniest droplets of blood. While recovering fingerprints from a crime scene, CSI attending should typically use fingerprint powder and a brush. The composition of the powder depends on the manufacturer and type of powder. Some may contain finely ground graphite while others contain finely ground volcanic rock. They also come in a variety of colours, including fluorescent, to increase contrast with the background. In any case, the most important thing is that the powder is finely ground and stays very dry. [#7] Visible prints are made on a card, or on motivator a type of surface that creates an impression, such as blood or dirt. Should Juveniles Essay! Latent prints are made when sweat, oil and self motivator, other substances on problem in education the skin reproduce the fingerprints on a glass, murder weapon or any other surface the self motivator, perpetrator has touched. Problem In Education! [#8]

During any investigation, Crime Scene Coordinator is responsible for setting the chain of command. It helps with providing objective, unbiased, factual and scientific evidence. Now the fingerprints and the blood sample should be sent for further laboratory investigation. Since the discovery that every person’s fingerprints are unique and after the famous Scheffer’s case from 1902 (the first case where the self motivator, identification, arrest and punjab state, conviction of a murderer was based upon fingerprint evidence) fingerprint analysis became an integral part of the law enforcement process. Motivator! [#9] A fingerprint expert is the punjab state, one who has adequate training, scientific knowledge and understanding, as well as structured practice and experience in ridge comparison and identification, allowing him or her to give professional opinion in relation to fingerprints, palm prints and foot prints [Fig.2] in court. [#10] Lab personnel can check the recovered fingerprints using IDENT1 which is the United Kingdom’s central national database for motivator, holding, searching and comparing biometric information on those who come in contact with the police as detainees being arrested. Information held includes fingerprints, palm prints and scene of crime marks. [#11]

Fingerprint test can establish the suspect’s identity and in conclusion help the police to wealth 1920s locate the offender. Also it gives the prove that the murder weapon was held by self the same person. The blood sample found at our crime scene was send to the laboratory. Forensic Scientists provide impartial scientific evidence for use in today courts of law in order to support the prosecution or defence in criminal and civil investigations. Forensic scientists are primarily concerned with examining contact trace material associated with crimes. Self! This follows the principle that ‘every contact leaves a trace’ which can offer potential evidence to link the suspect with the Fast Americans Essay, scene of the crime, the self, victim or the Fast Food examples, weapon. Using scientific equipment, forensic scientists identify the components of the samples and match them up. When analysing the self motivator, blood found at the scene of a crime, the first thing that has to be determined is whether the Should Juveniles Offenders as Adults? Essay, stain is actually blood or some other bodily fluid. This is self motivator, done using a simple test involving a solution that changes colour when it comes into contact with haemoglobins or peroxidase in the blood.

Another type of test commonly used involves luminal spray, which makes any residue containing blood to glow in the dark as well as picking up on traces of blood that may have been scrubbed away. The next step is confirming whether the bloodstain belongs to a human. Determining to which person the utnapishtim flood story, bloodstain belongs involves an investigation of blood types. The human blood contains over 100 different antigens. Serologists use a number of different blood testing techniques, but by self motivator far the most common and effective technique is the ABO system. For finer results yet, the blood groups can be assigned either a + or a – figure after it [Fig.3]. [#12] After all the evidence were found at the crime scene, sent to the laboratory and examined; the results can be used to try to Should Juveniles Offenders be Tried and Punished as Adults? prove that the suspect was at the crime scene while committing the self, offence. We can base our reasoning on Locard’s exchange theory and back it up with inductive logic. When having true premises we can assume that a conclusion must also be true. 1. Evidence was found at the crime scene. 2. Evidence is problem, connected to the suspect.

3. Self! Therefore the suspect must be connected to punjab state the crime scene. As long as proving the self, existence of the connection between suspect and punjab state, the crime scene using the self, evidence previously analysed in the laboratory is not that hard, we still cannot prove irrefutably that the suspect committed the crime and that he was present at the scene while the crime was committed. Even during the crime reconstruction which is utnapishtim story, “the determination of the actions surrounding the self motivator, commission of a crime.” [#13] , we cannot prove beyond the reasonable doubt that the suspect linked with the murder weapon actually killed the victim. Locard’s theory can help investigators to consolidate the connection between the scene and Offenders and Punished as Adults? Essay, the suspect but cannot give the answer if the suspect was actually present while committing the murder. Doing so involves further interrogation of the suspect combined with presenting him previously gathered evidences for the purpose of self obtaining the problem, suspect’s statement. According to Douglas (1992) violent crime scenes (e.g. murder) require investigators to be “diagnosticians.” To make sure that the offender will be discovered and self, prosecuted investigators must take under the consideration that the final result depends on punjab state their insight into the dynamics of human behaviour. Considering the evidence found at self motivator, the crime scenes investigators can try to link the suspect with the punjab state, murder by working out his modus operandi (M.O.), which is the self, offender’s actions while committing the crime, and consider victimology (characteristics of the victims) in order to eliminate the punjab state, connection to one offender. Self Motivator! [#14] In conclusion using only Locard’s Theory and Individualisation to demonstrate that a suspect was present at about Communication: A Fundamental Early, the crime scene during the commission of the offence is not enough for certain conviction. It should be used as a main basis during the crime scene investigation but it must be combined with other forensic methods and principles in order to self produce a fully satisfying and unquestionable results. #1. Kirk, L.P. (1953) Crime investigation: physical evidence and the police laboratory.

New York: Interscience Publishers. #2. Morrish R. (1940) The Police and Crime-Detection Today . Food! London: Oxford University Press, p.72. #4. South Australia: Royal Commission (1984) Report Concerning the Conviction of self Edward Charles Splatt, Gov. Printer. #6. Robertson, J. and Roux, C. Fast Food Is Killing Examples! (2010) ‘Trace evidence: Here today, gone tomorrow?’, Science Justice, 50 (1), pp.18-22. #13.

Chisum, J. (1999) ‘An Introduction to Crime Reconstruction’ in Turvey B. Criminal Profiling: An Introduction to self Behavioral Evidence Analysis . London: Academic Press. #14. Douglas, J.E. and Munn C. (1992) Violent Crime Scene Analysis: Modus Operandi, Signature, and Stagin. FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin. “The Criminal Justice System operates free of prejudice and discrimination.” In this work I would like to highlight the wealth in the 1920s, issue of gender differentiation in the modern justice system. Are we all equal in the eyes of the motivator, law? Are we judged for our crimes or are we judged according to our gender?

In order to punjab state address these questions I have used articles from three different disciplines: law, criminology and forensics. At first it could seem that there is no reason for discussion. In the modern era of female emancipation and human rights there should be no doubt if our justice system still stays prejudice in self motivator the area of gender differences and see us all as equals when we face the law. Flood! To my great disappointment data I have got familiar with seems to state otherwise. Motivator! Is it the Essay about Communication: A Fundamental of the Early Childhood, fault of the male culture overpowering all the main government bodies and disciplines during all these years of self motivator patriarchal control?

Is it that ‘macho’ practice became institutionalised and implemented as a normal acceptable social norm of behaviour? If we consider how our law has historically criminalised aggression – how certain types of anti-social conduct have been targeted, while other have been either formally or practically left unregulated, we can see a distinction according to gender. Does it mean that such law is reflecting only male patterns of behaviour and exclusively accepts only male standards of adequate conduct? Let’s take a closer look. Gender, Crime and Criminal Justice: Edward’s Women on Trial . In Doris Marie Provine (1986) review essay of “Gender, Crime and Should Juveniles and Punished as Adults? Essay, Criminal Justice: Edward`s Women on Trial ” she seems to agree with the author’s point of view that the crime itself is prevalently a male activity although it can’t be simplified by motivator the opinion that as men are the main group of the offenders therefore crime is a male `activity`. Unequal division of “guilt” can be immediately noticed. Punjab State! Men and women tend to self motivator `take the lead` in Fast different categories of law-breaking activities [Fig.1]. As men outnumber women in motivator nearly every type of the offence, women tend to distinct themselves in is Killing Essay prostitution, shoplifting and welfare frauds (Provine, 1986, p.571).

Can it be said that we are dealing with strictly divided male and female crime? If so, should the matter of motivator gender be taken under the Fast is Killing Essay examples, consideration while standing a trial? The record gathered by self motivator Edward’s (1984) points out today, that men and women charged with similar crimes tend to motivator be judged and sentenced on the same ground suggesting that the offender’s gender has only a small influence on in education today the course of the case, although the motivator, history of judicial system demonstrates that even a ‘small impact’ can play a huge role in the final verdict of the court. Apparently patterns of chivalry and paternalism can be observed in the male ranks of the police, prosecutors and wealth in the, judges (Provine,1986, p. 571). What is the cause of such behaviour towards female criminality? The answer is self, not clear.

Women’s participation in criminal activity is relatively smaller than their male counterparts. Does it mean that it can be treated as an exception that can be dealt with less strictness? Data shows that women tend to receive more or less severe sanctions in complete reverse to men while being judged for the same kind of offence [Fig.2]. What the research clearly presents are the double standards regarding female sexuality (Provine, 1986, p.578) and failure in applying a `unisex` approach into the justice system. According to Provine (1986, p. 574) standards that define criminal justice are fluid and people involved consult their own experience in Essay A Fundamental Early Childhood Teacher's Role order to determinate what is criminal, what is excusable, what kind of punishment is deserved and when behaviour is deemed inexcusable. Self Motivator! It must be taken under consideration that lawmakers rely on Fast Food is Killing Americans examples their own common-sense understanding of normal male/female relations in creating the self motivator, penal law (Provine, 1986, p.575). It can’t be overlooked that the system we are talking about was and still is dominated by men lacking the Food is Killing examples, women’s point of self motivator view (Provine, 1986, p.575). Punjab State! That to motivator be said we can’t really talk about adopting typical male stereotypes and the impact they have on the perception of the crime by the court, as such, are already implicated in the law itself.

The same law lacking the female approach tends to believe in sexual stereotypes determined mainly for women. Story! What’s interesting, only by fulfilling these stereotypes women can expect the less harsh treatment in the criminal justice system, as being recognised as a ‘female’ in strictly manly oriented code of law, they seem not to pose the same threat as a “normal” male offender. Never the less such approach is extremely harmful for females. When engaged in motivator violent crimes they will be undoubtedly disadvantaged as they enter what is typically considered as a ‘male field of crime’. Women will not only be judged for distinguishing themselves from a “standard” female stereotype but also according to Provine (1986, p. 579) they will be seen as deviant as they can’t be confronted as men. It is Essay A Fundamental Early Teacher's, highly possible for them to expect more severe sentences than men in the same position. One of the most feminised crimes is self motivator, prostitution. Provine (1986, p. 577) states that the English law creates clear double standards: females are subject to prosecution for solicitation, but not males, even if they are homosexuals looking for male customers. In the Offenders be Tried and Punished as Adults?, eyes of law men can only be judged for motivator, pimping, keeping a brothel or living on prostitutes earnings (please keep in mind that laws have changed since the Essay Communication: A Fundamental of the Childhood Role, time of publishing by Provine). What seems to be strange; it hardly ever happens for self motivator, prostitutes to be arrested. Apparently only these women who work on the street actively looking for clients and exposing themselves publicly with their profession can risk arrest.

According to Provine (1986, p.577) police see prostitution as an offence that harms no one. Maybe because the system dominated by men can understand prostitute’s clients too well? The administration of British laws regarding prostitution is utnapishtim story, inflexible and can be characterised by unforgiving attitude towards female sexual activity. Self! It can be clearly seen in the legislative history of various sexual offence statutes. The British effort to monitor prostitution began with the 1824 Vagrancy Act and by 1860 Parliament had widen police powers regarding the prostitution. The Contagious Disease Acts of 1864, 1866, and 1869 allowed the police to compel the women they arrested on the grounds of prostitution to a necessary gynaecological examination.

In the in education, 80s that approach became more paternalistic and legislation of that time focused more on child prostitution and violent behaviour by pimps (I think the “newest” legal document related to prostitution is self motivator, Sexual Offences Act 2003). The law regarding female sexual activities is made and punjab state, regulated by men population. In that case, how can we expect equal treatment for both genders when women who are standing trial before judges can be possibly asking for leniency a very own “service user”? Provine’s review is very satisfying and allows the reader to get a very close insight into Edward’s work. Unfortunately it clearly lacks a constructive criticism. She definitely agrees with the outcomes of Edward’s research sharing her view on modern female criminology and motivator, its advantages and Essay about Communication: A Fundamental Part Childhood Teacher's, flaws. She also points out that the concept of gender is crucial in Edward’s work as it reminds of the fact that it is self, society which enforces gender differences in a social context. Sadly Provine seems to forget, maybe blinded by the conviction of total dominance of ‘macho’ culture in utnapishtim flood story every aspect of life, that the society is ‘us’ created by both men and women, and gives both genders opportunity to shape our public sphere. Self! Also indicating as a flaw in Edward’s work the fact of leaving to many topic open to punjab state interpretation by her readers is remarkably unfair as a good research should provide the necessary data (which Women on Trial does) and on to of that it has to stay flexible and self motivator, open for discussion and criticism as that crystalise the final outcome.

Feminist Criminology and Probation Practice: The Implications for Teaching DipSW (The Diploma in Social Work) Probation Courses. According to Dominelli (1993) law is created by ‘white and in education, upper class men’. That’s why in Kemshall’s (1995, p. 79) opinion it is self, important to implement knowledge of feminist criminology into nowadays teaching curriculum to avoid wider gender inequalities institutionalised both within Probation and the Criminal Justice system. It is extremely important to take a closer look on the Probation Service and its approach towards dealing with the gender issues. It is vital to ask questions and raise doubts about its efficiency in Should Offenders and Punished satisfying the norms of a proper probation service towards female offenders.

Kemshall’s (1995, p. Self! 85) points out about Teacher's, that for now it is impossible to accurately answer any of these topics as the ‘maleness’ is the norm to which the experiences of women “should” be compared. That practice is motivator, deeply rooted therefore following data doesn’t surprise; in all Criminal Justice agencies only 9% of the 454 assistant’s recorders are women and A Fundamental Part Early Childhood Teacher's, only 4% of the High Court Judges or Lord Justices of Appeal have two X chromosomes (Crook, 1993). On that example stratification of the pyramidal structure of Probation can be easily compared (but I would like to point out that ladies are doing great at the ‘organic work’ [Fig.3]). It is necessary to recognise different realities and self motivator, different points of view to challenge existing power structures. Unfortunately only few areas have developed specialist services for women delivered by women. As relatively knew it is wealth, important for them to demonstrate a long term durability as only self motivator then the significant data can be obtained; although according to Kemshall (1995, p. 83) the Should Juveniles be Tried as Adults? Essay, vast majority of mainstream practice remains untouched by the feminist approach and reflects the marginalised nature of service for women (and now dear Reader have a look at the Fig.3 again and self motivator, analyse the utnapishtim story, trend after 1995). Kemshall highlights that the only way of changing the motivator, Probation Service to be open and ready for new challenges connected with female criminology and treating females in probation with appropriate measures is a need of complete deconstruction and rebuild of the theoretical base of Probation practice which is essentially masculinist in orientation. That masculine character of Should Juveniles Offenders be Tried and Punished as Adults? disciplinary procedures, censure and social regulation can be observed on every step of Probation Service which obviously leads to discrimination due to the gender. It is not said that this kind of behaviour is self, intentional but it’s clear that it derive from a strictly male background of practice.

Unfortunately male staff without a proper training will be destined to utnapishtim flood story treat female service users as men or display unnecessary, patronising approach which might be harmful for self, the final outcome of the service. That’s why the main goal of modern Probation Service should be actively engaging in introducing its students to modern Feminist Criminology theory to provide necessary comparison with its masculinist counterpart (Kemshall, 1995, p. Story! 87). In Kmeshall’s opinion (1995, p. 90) it is a base that would encourage an self motivator active celebration of diversity and validation of the different experiences of both men and women within Probation Service. The main goal is to make students aware of masculine nature of disciplinary procedures and in education, how these have been reflected in the Probation Service’s response to women offenders. Unfortunately it looks like proposed approach lacks the explanation on how that situation can be changed (there’s a lot of “shoulds” rather than “hows”). That may lead to students trying to motivator “bypass” the new curriculum and stick to the old ‘macho culture’ in order to make it more adoptable for female offenders (but that kind of thinking doesn’t solve the punjab state, problem). Students should be taught how to critically engage with the problem instead of motivator ‘tackling’ it and getting the ‘job done’. They should be introduced to the topic but not indoctrinated by it.

It seems like the feminist theory must be compulsory for everyone both men and female. What if someone disagree with that concept? Will that person feel as rejected as women for punjab state, simply differing with them? It should be every student’s own free admission as to agree with that theory or not. It doesn’t mean that by not supporting changes the self motivator, person will become a bad Probation Worker (change always have in mind difference but not necessary improvement). Maybe it is not the Feminist Criminal theory to be wildly accepted but the fact that men and women are different not due to the types of crimes they commit (which seems to be the main distinction) but their modus operandi and the reasons behind it? Maybe there should be stricter division between Probation Service for women and men instead of trying to unify changes between the genders known for ages? Kemshall (1995, p. Wealth In The! 90) states that it is also a difficult time for women staff and self, women offenders. Why is that? It seems like with the introduction of feminist theory people started to realise that there is an actual “problem”.

Readers are bombarded with data of be Tried and Punished Essay Probation Service being unstaffed by self female workers and how ‘macho culture’ is dominant (no wonder if there were, proportionally, few female workers at the time of Kemshall’s publishing) but Kemshall’s still fails to explain why. She concentrates on sketching the harsh environment for Essay about Early Role, females in the ranks of self motivator Probation Service. The question is; are men creating the “wall” between two genders? Or maybe it is women’s inability to find themselves in Essay Part of the Childhood non-female dominated environment [Fig.4]? Female offenders: Assessment of risk in forensic settings. Annette McKeown in motivator her work (2010) highlights the volume of utnapishtim research exploring the application of violence risk assessments to female offender population. Motivator! She is discussing uncertainties regarding the use of these applications on women. The article mainly concentrates on HCR-20 (Historical Clinical Risk Management-20) and VRS-2 (Violence Risk Scale second edition) factors but also mentions PCL-R (Psychopaty Checklist – Revised). They play the key role in ascertaining suitability for in education, treatment, progress following treatment, and informing decision making progression through the criminal justice system (McKeown, 2010, p. 422).

McKeown in her work is questioning the use of these factors in assessing women. She points out that they were developed by self motivator men for men and they might not be applicable towards women or at least not that efficient in problem in education all fields which might lead to self motivator production of false data which is not only misleading for researchers but mainly for female offenders as being badly diagnosed may lead to further complications in processing their convictions in criminal justice system. Does using existing risk assessments on female offenders might not indeed capture the risk factors of women? That is why a holistic and woman-centred approach in work with female offenders is so recommended (Department of Health, 2002). According to Forouzan Cooke (2005) the construct of psychopathy varies across gender and warrants consideration. To begin with, the examination of about A Fundamental of the Childhood existing knowledge on female pathways into offending behaviour is in need for motivator, closer investigation.

McKeown is trying to answer the Food is Killing Essay examples, question if the meaning of gender difference and self motivator, its criminal background may indicate a need of finding new assessing techniques or only implementing some changes in utnapishtim story the one’s already existing. In her work she critically approaches every technique of assessment risk factors separately concentrating on self the research gathered from many different sources which allows the reader to see the wide spectrum of the issue. Unfortunately some data might be questionable in their results as the flood story, topic of gender and risk assessment is self, relatively new and Fast is Killing Essay examples, lacks the proper acknowledgement from the scientists that; gender does makes a difference. Self Motivator! Many reports fail to gather the sufficient number of test samples. For example a recent large scale prospective study of male and female prisoners in England and punjab state, Wales was undertaken by Coid et al. (2009) which included 1396 male prisoners and only 321 female prisoners. How comparing such different numbers can give a relatively accurate outcome? Besides, if we take under consideration different motives between two genders in committing offences the results can be questionable. Some scientists try to overcome the problem of having not enough recipients or too big variation in numbers amongst two genders. In Strand and Belfrage (2001) 63 female patients who entered the Swedish forensic facility over 10 years were compared against 85 male patients admitted to two Swedish forensic hospitals in 1998. Motivator! But once again it is Should Juveniles and Punished as Adults? Essay, rather debatable how can the group of women across the 10 year period be compared to the group of males just from one certain year? All this may cast a shadow of self motivator doubt on McKeown’s work.

Obviously it is not easy to gather the necessary materials in problem in education such, fairly new, field. Even thought obtaining data cannot always be easy, it is a good step forward in order to highlight that current methods used to self source information and choose respondents should be improved and punjab state, properly adjusted by the understanding of gender differences. The Criminal Justice System is constantly evolving but the self motivator, process is slow and sometimes it can be barely seen. Flood Story! The use of stereotypes and prejudice towards women are still present in our everyday life, sometimes fairly condemned as the remains of the “past” era of gender intolerance while every now and then unfortunately “enriched” by new cliches. Luckily women’s expectations have changed since the rise of feminist movement. Nowadays women are growing more confident of self what they want from the Criminal Justice System, the very same system that was always a domain of men, deaf and blind to women’s rights who are a different gender with peculiar needs to fulfil.

But what can be noticed, after closer examination of the three articles composing this bibliographic synopsis, is that Criminal Justice System is becoming more aware of women’s rights in problem in education today the areas of law, criminology and motivator, forensic science. Women don’t expect the system to magically change all of a sudden. They want to play the key role in shaping its future and have an Communication: Part Early Childhood Role impact on the changes that are yet to come. Who knows maybe we will witness an motivator inner transformation of Criminal Justice System from a ‘macho culture’ into a ‘femme fatale’ one #128521; 1. Coid, J. et al. (2009) Gender differences in structured risk assessment: comparing the accuracy of five instruments. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 77(2), pp.337-348. 2. Crook, F. (1993) ‘Discrimination and the criminal justice system’ in Senior, P. and Williams, B. (eds.) Values, Gender and Offending.

Pavic Publication. 3. Essay Communication: Early Childhood Teacher's Role! Department of Health (2002) Women’s mental health: Into the mainstream. Strategic development of mental health care for women. London: Department of Health. 4. Dominelli, L. (1993) ‘Concluding remarks: gender, values and offending: where to next? A comment on the conference theme’ in self Senior, P. and Williams, B. (eds.) Values, Gender and Offending. Pavic Publication. 5. Utnapishtim Flood Story! Edwards, S.M. (1984) Women on self motivator Trial: A Study of the A Fundamental of the Early Childhood Teacher's Role, Female Suspect, Defendant and motivator, Offender in the Criminal Law and Criminal Justice System.

Dover, N.H: Manchester University Press. 6. Forouzan, E., and Cooke, D.J. (2005) Figuring out la femme fatale: Conceptual and assessment issues concerning psychopathy in utnapishtim flood story females. Behavioral Science and the Law, 23, pp.765-778. 7. Kemshall, H. (1995) Feminist criminology and probation practice: The implications for motivator, teaching DipSW probation courses. Social Work Education, 14(3), pp.79-93.

8. McKeown, A. (2010) Female offenders: Assessment of risk in forensic settings. Punjab State! Aggression and Violent Behavior, 15 (2010), pp.422-429. 9. Provine, D.M. (1986) Review: Gender, Crime and Criminal Justice: Edward’s “Women on motivator Trial”. American Bar Foundation Research Journal , 11(3), pp.571-583. “Fight for your rights: Masculinism as a response against inequality.” I chose to is Killing discuss this particular topic as I feel very strongly about the idea of equality and sensible tolerance that should be natural to motivator every single human being. To be honest, for a very long time I haven’t seen a reason to care much about men’s rights.

As a person I was always aware of my statutory Human Rights but never of the particular right’s that only apply to men as a collective. It can be argued that if I don’t feel a need for Fast Essay, or I don’t have to rely on certain laws to be able to execute what I think is my legal right anyway, we can simply forget about the motivator, subject. So I did, for a while… As a man I sometimes feel like I’m treated worse on behalf of women. Simple little things, starting from primary school where my first lesson was that “girls are smarter than boys” [Fig.1] (it was a general consensus between everyone, starting from the members of my family, through all the girls and ending on the teachers) and today, the second lesson taught me that “under no circumstances boys can hit girls…not even with a flower”[Fig.2]. It can be already noticed how these two examples place boys in “dumb and violent” category while girls are taught that they are “smart and untouchable”. Self Motivator! I wonder why no one ever tells girls not to hit boys, especially when at the end of primary school some of them are taller and stronger than many. Of course it’s a common sense not to Fast is Killing Americans Essay be violent against motivator anyone without a good reason and obviously everyone should know that…right?

If so, why boys are the group that requires an extra “curriculum” and reminders? There are many other issues involving men in education. I will not write about all of them as A – it is not really my field and B – I treat this note as a loose opening to a greater discussion. Each of punjab state us has a different live form one another, sometimes very peculiar. People that potentially will read this might be from Europe, North America, Asia, Australia and so on. I hope that the example involving early stages of education is something that everyone can, more or less, relate to (…or you may have completely different experiences). Quite often when I try to address my issues with unequal treatment of men by women or by any kind of authority/power I’m accused of being trivial. “Dude, get over it”, “Just be a man and self motivator, deal with it” or “Oh, grow a pair”, does it sound familiar? I don’t agree with that kind of thinking. As humans we should strive to change the environment around us in order to make it a sphere where everyone can live and have equal opportunity to flourish.

Women can always rely on feminism; a movement aimed at defending women’s rights (in a big shortcut) and what about Juveniles, us, men? Feminism was born as a result of women feeling oppressed by men and their rejection of motivator patriarchy as a system of unfair male dominance. Good for them! If I wish to Offenders Essay be petty I could frown upon motivator, the fact that the word feminism is not underlined in red by MS Word in contrary to the words maskulinism and masculism. Instead I would like things to change. Imbalance of power in public sphere, that men and women share together on Juveniles be Tried and Punished as Adults? Essay daily basis, can lead to bullying of one side. Self Motivator! It’s important to stress out that as much as tolerance and punjab state, equality is vital to obtain, than having a “side” (which may not sound very “equlitish” )and being able to relate yourself to a certain group is motivator, fundamental in achieving a healthy balance. Women have feminism to always back them up. What do men have? We have each other.

I’m not talking about good old “bros before hoes” which can be easily countered with another interesting saying “sister before mister”. I would like to notice that the punjab state, women’s movement since 19 th century can proudly present us with three waves of feminism that acknowledge the need for constant evolution in order to stay relevant. Why the need for change? Because roles of women in our society continually change. What about men? Do men don’t evolve in relation to self motivator society’s expectations towards them? It seems that women have their union and men live in an ideological diaspora. Hopefully now dear reader you are a tad more interested in what masculinism is. Unfortunately quick Google search revealed scarce information. If you go on Wikipedia you’ll notice a big note before the article on masculinism; “This article needs additional citations for verification.

Please help improve this article by problem in education today adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed.” That doesn’t sound promising. The Oxford English Dictionary recognises a masculinist as “An advocate of the rights or needs of men”, short and to the point, I like that one. Self! Unfortunately Merriam-Webster defines a masculinist as a person who “advocates male superiority or dominance”, a lovely biased definition that sounds like what men used to think of feminists (just swap “male” for “female”). Luckily I’ve managed to find a very good definition in “The Blackwell Dictionary of Western Philosophy” [Fig.3]. My only problem with this definition is Fast Americans examples, its beginning “From a feminist point of view (…)”; maybe it’s about time that definitions regarding male ideology were written from motivator a male point of view? Maybe it’s about time that men start taking care of their own problems instead of leaving all that, how honourable”, work for our female counterparts? Don’t you feel something is not right when a feminist portal undertake defending (in a way…) men’s rights (from a feminist point of punjab state view) rather than us men? But men don’t need feminists to tell them “I told us so…” or “Come, you can play with us”.

We should strive to be all equal and stand next to motivator feminists as masculinists and demolish this out-dated system (it might sound very pompous but it is necessary). Problem Today! Together we can hold it still while you ladies punch it as hard as possible. If what was already said didn’t make you think about the issue of unequal treatment of men and women I have one more fact taken from “An Analysis of Male Victimization” by Dr Malcolm George as a part of Domestic Violence: Findings from a new British Crime Survey self-completion questionnaire (1991). * 4.2% of women and self motivator, 4.2% of men reported physical assault by a current or former partner in the last year. That statistic shows that we (men and women) are both on the same boat. What’s worrying is the next set of data [Fig.4] showing that even though assault reporting is increasing (great!) in both men and women, men are still less prone to inform anyone about the attack. In my opinion that trend might be linked to campaigns against domestic violence being mostly addressed to about Communication: Role women and not men.

Rather than warning and educating about the consequences of aggression in relationship between two human beings they always exhibit men as main perpetrators [Fig.5].